judy_0.0.4-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2003-07-12 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
judy_0.0.4-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/j/judy/judy_0.0.4-5.diff.gz
judy_0.0.4-5.dsc
  to pool/main/j/judy/judy_0.0.4-5.dsc
libjudy-dev_0.0.4-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/j/judy/libjudy-dev_0.0.4-5_i386.deb
libjudydebian0_0.0.4-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/j/judy/libjudydebian0_0.0.4-5_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.



judy override disparity

2003-07-12 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):

libjudy-dev_0.0.4-5_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says 
libdevel.

Either the package or the override file is incorrect.  If you think
the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package
so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload.  If you feel the
override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why.

--
Debian distribution maintenance software

(This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there
is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by
mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])



Bug#198676: gtk-doc-tools: fails to install

2003-07-12 Thread Sebastian Rittau
Jerome Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> When I try to install it, I get:
> Setting up gtk-doc-tools (1.0-6) ...
> install/gtk-doc-tools: Handling install for emacsen flavor emacs20
> IO error reading /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/subdirs.el: Invalid argument
> emacs-package-install:
> /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/gtk-doc-tools emacs20 emacs20
> failed at /usr/lib/emacsen-common/emacs-package-install line 30, 
> line 1.

I cannot reproduce this problem with gtk-doc-tools 1.0-12. Can you try
this again? If it still fails, can you try, whether "cat
/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/subdirs.el" works?

Thanks,

 - Sebastian




Processed: gtk-doc 1.1 will be packaged when possible

2003-07-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 196892 -wontfix
Bug#196892: gtk-doc-tools: new upstream version 1.1 available
Tags were: wontfix
Tags removed: wontfix

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Bug#166738: This package is going to be removed.

2003-07-12 Thread David Martinez Moreno
tags + pending
thanks

I've filed a bug for the removing of this package from the archive, as 
is the 
last remnant from aethera, already removed. See 
http://bugs.debian.org/ftp.debian.org.
-- 
 Why is a cow? Mu. (Omm)




Processed: Need more info

2003-07-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 198676 moreinfo
Bug#198676: gtk-doc-tools: fails to install
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Bug#193512: marked as done (gtkdoc-mkdb: wrong doctype for docbook)

2003-07-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 12 Jul 2003 14:17:08 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#193512: fixed in gtk-doc 1.0-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 May 2003 05:45:57 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 16 00:45:56 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ip68-106-63-104.ph.ph.cox.net (anarxia.dyndns.org) 
[68.106.63.104] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19GY2W-0001v9-00; Fri, 16 May 2003 00:45:56 -0500
Received: from anarxia by anarxia.dyndns.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19GY2q-0003Kp-00; Thu, 15 May 2003 22:46:16 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Nicos Panayides <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gtkdoc-mkdb: wrong doctype for docbook
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 22:46:16 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Nicos Panayides <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: gtk-doc-tools
Version: 1.0-4
Severity: normal

gtkdoc-mkdb creates the main sgml page with the doctype
"-//DavenPort//DTD DocBook V3.0//EN" which is wrong.
The correct doctype is "-//Davenport//DTD DocBook V3.0//EN"
This has been fixed in the new upstream (1.1).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux localhost 2.4.21-pre7 #1 Sat Apr 5 14:06:36 MST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=el_GR

Versions of packages gtk-doc-tools depends on:
ii  docbook-dsssl 1.78-3 modular DocBook DSSSL stylesheets,
ii  docbook-to-man1:2.0.0-11 Converter from DocBook SGML into r
ii  jade  1.2.1-29.3 James Clark's DSSSL Engine
ii  perl  5.8.0-17   Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  xsltproc  1.0.29-1   XSLT command line processor

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 193512-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jul 2003 18:23:11 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 12 13:23:10 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19bP1W-0003Hj-00; Sat, 12 Jul 2003 13:23:06 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19bOvk-0001TX-00; Sat, 12 Jul 2003 14:17:08 -0400
From: Sebastian Rittau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.34 $
Subject: Bug#193512: fixed in gtk-doc 1.0-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 14:17:08 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gtk-doc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gtk-doc-tools_1.0-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gtk-doc/gtk-doc-tools_1.0-12_i386.deb
gtk-doc_1.0-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gtk-doc/gtk-doc_1.0-12.diff.gz
gtk-doc_1.0-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gtk-doc/gtk-doc_1.0-12.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sebastian Rittau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gtk-doc package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 19:50:31 +0200
Source: gtk-doc
Binary: gtk-doc-tools
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sebastian Rittau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Sebastian Rittau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 gtk-doc-tools - GTK documentation tools
Closes: 193512
Changes: 
 gtk-doc (1.0-12) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Use CDBS:
 + debian/rules: Rewritten.
 + debian/compat: Vers

Possible removal (or orphaning) of vold.

2003-07-12 Thread David Martinez Moreno
Hello, QA people. Trying to close RC#138404, I see that the package is 
completely unmaintained. Please see http://bugs.debian.org/vold. The 
maintainer is not anybody from Debian (as far as I can investigate, because 
db.d.o keeps broken :-(  ).

The bug (#138404) would be fixed by adapting the package to new C++ API 
(gcc-3.3 one). I think is not worth the effort. The package from Tollef does 
not fix anything, because the only thing changed in the new package is a 
different Depends: line. Not a forward-port. The maintainer seems to not be 
active.

I would bet for orphaning or removing entirely from the archive. What 
do you 
think?

Orphan/Remove [default:O]?

:-)

Later,


Ender.
-- 
 Why is a cow? Mu. (Omm)



Processed: This package is going to be removed.

2003-07-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 166738 + pending
Bug#166738: FTBFS with gcc 3.2
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)