libparagui1.0_1.0.2-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: libparagui1.0-dev_1.0.2-4_i386.deb to pool/main/libp/libparagui1.0/libparagui1.0-dev_1.0.2-4_i386.deb libparagui1.0_1.0.2-4.diff.gz to pool/main/libp/libparagui1.0/libparagui1.0_1.0.2-4.diff.gz libparagui1.0_1.0.2-4.dsc to pool/main/libp/libparagui1.0/libparagui1.0_1.0.2-4.dsc libparagui1.0_1.0.2-4_i386.deb to pool/main/libp/libparagui1.0/libparagui1.0_1.0.2-4_i386.deb paragui-themes_1.0.2-4_i386.deb to pool/main/libp/libparagui1.0/paragui-themes_1.0.2-4_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Bug#193114: marked as done (libparagui1.0_1.0.2-2(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends?)
Your message dated Tue, 13 May 2003 07:07:06 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#193114: marked as done (libparagui1.0_1.0.2-2(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends?) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 May 2003 00:41:18 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 12 19:41:17 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from atlrel9.hp.com [156.153.255.214] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19FNr2-vA-00; Mon, 12 May 2003 19:41:16 -0500 Received: from whatone.fc.hp.com (whatone.fc.hp.com [15.238.4.40]) by atlrel9.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1608A1C00F8A for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 12 May 2003 20:41:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: by whatone.fc.hp.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CF86B1D4802; Mon, 12 May 2003 18:41:15 -0600 (MDT) Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 18:41:15 -0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libparagui1.0_1.0.2-2(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends? Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-14.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,NO_REAL_NAME,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: libparagui1.0 Version: 1.0.2-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of libparagui1.0_1.0.2-2 on sarti by sbuild/hppa 1.170.2 > Build started at 20030513-0031 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), docbook-to-man, libexpat1-dev, > libfreetype6-dev, libsdl1.2-dev (>= 1.2.5-1), zlib1g-dev, autotools-dev [...] > creating include/paraconfig_gnu.h > dh_testdir > # Add here commands to compile the package. > /usr/bin/make > make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/libparagui1.0-1.0.2' > cd . && /build/buildd/libparagui1.0-1.0.2/missing automake-1.4 --gnu Makefile > WARNING: `automake-1.4' is needed, and you do not seem to have it handy on > your > system. You might have modified some files without having the > proper tools for further handling them. Check the `README' file, > it often tells you about the needed prerequirements for installing > this package. You may also peek at any GNU archive site, in case > some other package would contain this missing `automake-1.4' program. > make[1]: *** [Makefile.in] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/libparagui1.0-1.0.2' > make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=hppa&pkg=libparagui1.0&ver=1.0.2-2 See the autotools-dev README for options on dealing with auto-built files. lamont --- Received: (at 193114-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 May 2003 05:07:40 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 13 00:07:39 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from csiges9.insa-lyon.fr (mail.insa-lyon.fr) [134.214.79.200] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19FS0o-0002yG-00; Tue, 13 May 2003 00:07:38 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.insa-lyon.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3DA74B423 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 13 May 2003 07:06:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from serveur.aurel32.net (F110.resF.insa-lyon.fr [134.214.165.23]) by mail.insa-lyon.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D526E4B422 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 13 May 2003 07:06:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from amavis by serveur.aurel32.net with scanned-ok (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19FS0J-0003C7-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 13 May 2003 07:07:07 +0200 Received: from serveur.aurel32.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (serveur.aurel32.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11836-02 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 13 May 2003 07:07:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pc.aurel32 ([192.168.3.10]) by serveur.aurel32.net wi
Processed: retitle 148582 to libparagui1.0: name of the source package should be the same as the upstream one
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 148582 libparagui1.0: name of the source package should be the same > as the upstream one Bug#148582: name of the source package should be the same as the upstream one Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
libparagui1.0_1.0.2-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: libparagui1.0-dev_1.0.2-5_i386.deb to pool/main/libp/libparagui1.0/libparagui1.0-dev_1.0.2-5_i386.deb libparagui1.0_1.0.2-5.diff.gz to pool/main/libp/libparagui1.0/libparagui1.0_1.0.2-5.diff.gz libparagui1.0_1.0.2-5.dsc to pool/main/libp/libparagui1.0/libparagui1.0_1.0.2-5.dsc libparagui1.0_1.0.2-5_i386.deb to pool/main/libp/libparagui1.0/libparagui1.0_1.0.2-5_i386.deb paragui-themes_1.0.2-5_i386.deb to pool/main/libp/libparagui1.0/paragui-themes_1.0.2-5_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
libparagui1.0_1.0.2-6_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: libparagui1.0-dev_1.0.2-6_i386.deb to pool/main/libp/libparagui1.0/libparagui1.0-dev_1.0.2-6_i386.deb libparagui1.0_1.0.2-6.diff.gz to pool/main/libp/libparagui1.0/libparagui1.0_1.0.2-6.diff.gz libparagui1.0_1.0.2-6.dsc to pool/main/libp/libparagui1.0/libparagui1.0_1.0.2-6.dsc libparagui1.0_1.0.2-6_i386.deb to pool/main/libp/libparagui1.0/libparagui1.0_1.0.2-6_i386.deb paragui-themes_1.0.2-6_i386.deb to pool/main/libp/libparagui1.0/paragui-themes_1.0.2-6_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Bug#191646: marked as done (treeview.xbm missing from lib/blt2.4)
Your message dated Tue, 13 May 2003 06:17:10 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#191646: fixed in blt 2.4z-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 May 2003 13:58:54 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 02 08:58:53 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from jazz.ncnr.nist.gov [129.6.120.31] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19Bb3s-0002IZ-00; Fri, 02 May 2003 08:58:53 -0500 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by jazz.ncnr.nist.gov (SGI-8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA20276 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 2 May 2003 09:58:51 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 09:58:50 -0400 From: Paul Kienzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: treeview.xbm missing from lib/blt2.4 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_04_23 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_04_23 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: blt Version: 2.4z-0.3 Severity: normal treeview.xbm and treeview_m.xbm are not installed into /usr/lib/blt2.4. This causes the following tcl error when displaying a heirtable widget: cleanup reading bitmap file "/usr/lib/blt2.4/treeview.xbm" Test by pasting the following into wish: package require BLT pack [blt::hiertable .choose] Note that the xbm files are installed by blt-demo, so you won't notice the error if you have blt-demo in your distribution. Paul Kienzle [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 191646-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 May 2003 10:23:52 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 13 05:23:52 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19FWwq-0006vR-00; Tue, 13 May 2003 05:23:52 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19FWqM-0008EF-00; Tue, 13 May 2003 06:17:10 -0400 From: Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.34 $ Subject: Bug#191646: fixed in blt 2.4z-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 06:17:10 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of blt, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: blt-common_2.4z-1_i386.deb to pool/main/b/blt/blt-common_2.4z-1_i386.deb blt-demo_2.4z-1_i386.deb to pool/main/b/blt/blt-demo_2.4z-1_i386.deb blt-dev_2.4z-1_i386.deb to pool/main/b/blt/blt-dev_2.4z-1_i386.deb blt_2.4z-1.diff.gz to pool/main/b/blt/blt_2.4z-1.diff.gz blt_2.4z-1.dsc to pool/main/b/blt/blt_2.4z-1.dsc blt_2.4z-1_i386.deb to pool/main/b/blt/blt_2.4z-1_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated blt package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 23:28:58 -0700 Source: blt Binary: blt-common blt blt-dev blt-demo Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.4z-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: blt- shared libraries for BLT blt-common - common run-time parts to the BLT libraries blt-demo - BLT demo scripts - a Tcl/Tk extension library blt-dev- development in BLT - a Tcl/Tk extension library Closes: 162857 191646 Changes: blt (2.4z-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New maintainer (closes: #162857). * Stripped out support for obsolete 8.2 version of tcl/tk. * Moved (most) images to /usr/share to satisfy lintian. * Moved treeview bitmaps to blt-common where they can be a littl
Bug#193202: elm-me+: elm can't GPG encrypt messages
Package: elm-me+ Version: 2.4pl25ME+100-2 Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, It seems that GPG encrypting emails in ELM is broken. I can receive and decrypt or check the signatures on emails, I can even sign outgoing messages, but encrypting messages is broken. For example: $gpg --list-keys [EMAIL PROTECTED] pub 1024D/E61612A5 2002-09-13 Joseph Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sub 2048g/1870C37C 2002-09-13 But, when I try to encrypt a test message to myself, I get the following message at the bottom of the pgp screen: Couldn't find key matching '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'! Note, that I do have pgp-version = gpg, in my elmrc. Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe - -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux a750.nahmias.net 2.4.20 #1 Thu Jan 9 11:22:09 EST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages elm-me+ depends on: ii libc6 2.3.1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libncurses5 5.3.20021109-2 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libssl0.9.6 0.9.6j-1 SSL shared libraries (old version) di postfix [mail-transport-a 1.1.11.0-3 A high-performance mail transport -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+wRx8Kl23+OYWEqURAnLyAKCpXW71e99tgPyt3KAsa5iO9A2C3ACgxWNP v+gvWXez5XHT86CarkmhK/E= =E/AK -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#193215: Won't compile with g++-3.3
Package: jade Severity: important Version: 1.2.1-29.3 This is on hppa, not that should make a difference. g++-3.3 -pipe -D_REENTRANT -O2 -fno-implicit-templates -I. -I./../include \ -I./../generic -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_LIMITS_H=1 -DHAVE_ST_BLKSIZE=1 \ -DSP_HAVE_BOOL=1 -DSP_HAVE_LOCALE=1 -DSP_ANSI_CLASS_INST=1 \ -DSP_HAVE_SOCKET=1 -DJADE_MIF=1 -DJADE_HTML=1 -DSP_MULTI_BYTE=1 \ -DSGML_CATALOG_FILES_DEFAULT=\"/usr/local/share/sgml/catalog:/usr/local/lib/sgml/catalog:/etc/sgml/catalog\" \ -DSGML_SEARCH_PATH_DEFAULT=\"/usr/local/share/sgml:/usr/local/lib/sgml:/usr/share/sgml\" \ -DHAVE_DLFCN_H=1 -c parser_inst.cxx -fPIC -DPIC In file included from parser_inst.cxx:36: ../include/Ptr.cxx: In destructor `Ptr::~Ptr() [with T = AttributeValue]': ../include/Ptr.h:55: instantiated from `ConstPtr::ConstPtr() [with T = AttributeValue]' ../include/Attribute.h:36: instantiated from here ../include/Ptr.cxx:22: error: `unref' undeclared (first use this function) ../include/Ptr.cxx:22: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in.) ../include/Ptr.cxx:23: warning: invalid use of undefined type `struct AttributeValue' ../include/Attribute.h:28: warning: forward declaration of `struct AttributeValue' In file included from ../include/UnivCharsetDesc.h:13, from ../include/CharsetInfo.h:11, from ../include/Sd.h:13, from ../include/Markup.h:13, from ../include/Entity.h:22, from ../include/Dtd.h:14, from parser_inst.cxx:40: ../include/RangeMap.h: At global scope: ../include/RangeMap.h:57: warning: `Vector >::const_iterator' is implicitly a typename ../include/RangeMap.h:57: warning: implicit typename is deprecated, please see the documentation for details In file included from Recognizer.h:15, from parser_inst.cxx:61: ../include/Owner.cxx: In destructor `Owner::~Owner() [with T = BlankTrie]': ../include/CopyOwner.h:16: instantiated from `CopyOwner::CopyOwner() [with T = BlankTrie]' Trie.h:22: instantiated from here ../include/Owner.cxx:15: warning: invalid use of undefined type `struct BlankTrie' Trie.h:18: warning: forward declaration of `struct BlankTrie' -- "It's not Hollywood. War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or victory, it is about death. I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies. Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk
Bug#126046: gtick: Another weird error, this time related to app "name"
Hi, as the package description of gdkxft says, >*** THIS WILL CAUSE APPLICATIONS TO CRASH, DIE, LOSE INFORMATION, AND >OTHER NASTY EFFECTS. DON'T USE THIS IF YOU WANT STABILITY *** your problem is probably a gdkxft issue. Please try without it and report what happened. Thanks. bye, Roland -- Roland Stigge signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
