Bug#118064: marked as done (xttitle: example file would be nice)
Your message dated Thu, 08 May 2003 10:47:45 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#118064: fixed in xttitle 1.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Nov 2001 19:53:38 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 02 13:53:38 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from relativity.phy.olemiss.edu [130.74.16.250] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15zkNl-0004Fx-00; Fri, 02 Nov 2001 13:53:38 -0600
Received: by relativity.phy.olemiss.edu (Postfix, from userid 541)
id 45E0C4B51A; Fri, 2 Nov 2001 13:53:37 -0600 (CST)
From: Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xttitle: example file would be nice
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.31
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.31
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 13:53:37 -0600
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: xttitle
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: wishlist
While the man page gives a (slightly erroneous, due to nroff mangling)
example, it might be useful to provide some example code for .bashrc.
Here's an extract from my .bashrc:
# begin example .bashrc
update_title()
{
[ $TERM = "xterm" ] && xttitle "[$$] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:$PWD"
}
function cd()
{
builtin cd $*; update_title
}
function ssh()
{
/usr/bin/ssh $*; update_title
}
# If running interactively, then:
if [ "$PS1" ]; then
update_title
fi
# end example .bashrc
These settings seem to keep my title reasonably updated and don't
interfere with scp/rsync.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux relativity 2.4.9-ac18 #1 Sat Sep 29 20:17:53 CDT 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US
Versions of packages xttitle depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.4-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
---
Received: (at 118064-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 May 2003 14:53:38 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 08 09:53:38 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19Dmm9-00052x-00; Thu, 08 May 2003 09:53:37 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19DmgT-0005UW-00; Thu, 08 May 2003 10:47:45 -0400
From: Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.34 $
Subject: Bug#118064: fixed in xttitle 1.0-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 10:47:45 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xttitle, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
xttitle_1.0-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xttitle/xttitle_1.0-3.diff.gz
xttitle_1.0-3.dsc
to pool/main/x/xttitle/xttitle_1.0-3.dsc
xttitle_1.0-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xttitle/xttitle_1.0-3_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated xttitle
package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 21:12:12 +0200
Source: xttitle
Binary: xttitle
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
xttitle- Changes X terminal emulator window titles
Closes: 118064 190813
Changes:
xttitle (1.0-3) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New maintainer. (Closes: #190813)
* Bumped Standards-Version to 3.5.9, no change.
* Included .bashrc example from Chris Lawrence (Closes: #118064)
Files:
5af76376db0cb9f8cc34670e921a5bcf 558 x11 optional xttitle_1.0-3.dsc
857603ad073882421cd554ce688e7249 3046 x11 optional xttitle_1.0-3.diff.gz
a522f07d318c57c4d329454636ce998a 5782 x11 optional xttitle_1.0-3_i386.deb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
Bug#192490: libkdexparts1: uninstallable
Package: libkdexparts1 Version: 2.2.2-4 Severity: grave libkdexparts1 is uninstallable because it still depends on kdelibs3 and libfam0. It needs to be rebuilt against kdelibs4 and libfam0c102 with gcc 3.2, which probably also requires a new upstream version. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux cyberhq 2.4.21-pre5 #1 SMP Sat Mar 1 00:30:11 PST 2003 i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux
Re: intend to adopt calc, so does someone else--need advice
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 5 May 2003 at 09:38 -0500, Luis Bustamante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hi, Craig. > >> "Craig" == Craig P Steffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >Craig> Greetings, I'm an avid Linux user and programmer, and I'd >Craig> like to become a Debian Developer. As the first step in >Craig> this process, I'd like to take the calc source package and >Craig> maintain it via a sponsor. > >Craig> I have downloaded it, updated the it against a more recent >Craig> Debian Policy version. I also fixed the only bug against >Craig> the package (a wishlist that there be a file included in >Craig> the documentation). I have built the package, which is >Craig> lintian clean, and tested on three different Debian >Craig> machines of two different architectures; it's ready to go. > >Craig> Here's THE SNAG: I was sitting down to write to this list >Craig> to request a sponsor, I thought I'd check the qa page for >Craig> the package one more to make sure I hadn't missed anything. >Craig> Bug 188998 is from David Rios ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on April 14 >Craig> saying that he intends to adopt it. I tried e-mailing him >Craig> at that address, but it bounced with a "User Unknown" >Craig> error. I looked in the Debian Developer key ring, and I >Craig> don't think he's there. > >He's in the new maintainers queue, but his email address has changed >(switching jobs). You can reach him at [EMAIL PROTECTED] At any rate, David Rios was before you and he haven't said anything yet. So I suppose he is still interested on calc. >Craig> If anyone has any advice as to whether or not it would be >Craig> ethical to pursue getting a sponsor and uploading this >Craig> package, I'd appreciate it. In January, at DebConf 2 in Perth, Australia Bdale Garbee as DLP said that we should have more debian developers in countries where there are almost none. During a Linux conference in Mexico, he was amazed with the popularity of debian and none (zero) debian developers in that country. This is the oportunity of David Rios to become a debian developer. He is from Colombia where there is only _one_ debian developer. >Cheers, >-- >Luis Bustamante Aníbal Monsalve Salazar - -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Building 28C, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia Ph +61 3 99059849 Fx +61 3 99054746 Mb +61 4 08573670 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: http://www-personal.monash.edu.au/~anibal/gpg-public-key.shtml iD8DBQE+uvSOipBneRiAKDwRAkTzAJ9AcFJsSsr9VvbglodMQ6JdcYkbPwCfU5it X+rzhFEFtLjnihyecwzmoVw= =reP8 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
