tux-aqfh_1.0.14-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: tux-aqfh-data_1.0.14-3_all.deb to pool/main/t/tux-aqfh/tux-aqfh-data_1.0.14-3_all.deb tux-aqfh_1.0.14-3.diff.gz to pool/main/t/tux-aqfh/tux-aqfh_1.0.14-3.diff.gz tux-aqfh_1.0.14-3.dsc to pool/main/t/tux-aqfh/tux-aqfh_1.0.14-3.dsc tux-aqfh_1.0.14-3_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tux-aqfh/tux-aqfh_1.0.14-3_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 171283 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
vreng_4.2.0-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: vreng_4.2.0-1.diff.gz to pool/main/v/vreng/vreng_4.2.0-1.diff.gz vreng_4.2.0-1.dsc to pool/main/v/vreng/vreng_4.2.0-1.dsc vreng_4.2.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/v/vreng/vreng_4.2.0-1_i386.deb vreng_4.2.0.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/v/vreng/vreng_4.2.0.orig.tar.gz Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 133681 159148 160518 169894 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Bug#171283: marked as done (tux-aqfh: no man page for tux_aqfh)
Your message dated Wed, 04 Dec 2002 18:17:54 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#171283: fixed in tux-aqfh 1.0.14-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Nov 2002 20:42:02 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 30 14:42:01 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18IER7-0001lM-00; Sat, 30 Nov 2002 14:42:01 -0600 Received: from fuzz.uucp (a78.cmu.carnet.hr [193.198.128.79]) by jagor.srce.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id gAUKeqgM017125 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 30 Nov 2002 21:40:53 +0100 (MET) Received: from mvela by fuzz.uucp with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18IFMt-ti-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 30 Nov 2002 22:41:43 +0100 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tux-aqfh: no man page for tux_aqfh Date: 30 Nov 2002 22:41:42 +0100 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lines: 4 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter at jagor.srce.hr Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: tux-aqfh Version: 1.0.14-1 There should be a man page for tux_aqfh (see Policy, section 13.1). --- Received: (at 171283-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Dec 2002 23:23:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 04 17:23:07 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18JirD-0003rb-00; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 17:23:07 -0600 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 18JimA-0008AN-00; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 18:17:54 -0500 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.28 $ Subject: Bug#171283: fixed in tux-aqfh 1.0.14-3 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 18:17:54 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of tux-aqfh, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: tux-aqfh-data_1.0.14-3_all.deb to pool/main/t/tux-aqfh/tux-aqfh-data_1.0.14-3_all.deb tux-aqfh_1.0.14-3.diff.gz to pool/main/t/tux-aqfh/tux-aqfh_1.0.14-3.diff.gz tux-aqfh_1.0.14-3.dsc to pool/main/t/tux-aqfh/tux-aqfh_1.0.14-3.dsc tux-aqfh_1.0.14-3_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tux-aqfh/tux-aqfh_1.0.14-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated tux-aqfh package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 23:11:35 +0100 Source: tux-aqfh Binary: tux-aqfh-data tux-aqfh Architecture: source i386 all Version: 1.0.14-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: tux-aqfh - 3D Puzzle Game with Tux the Penguin tux-aqfh-data - Data files for Tux: A quest for herring Closes: 171283 Changes: tux-aqfh (1.0.14-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Write tux_aqfh.6 based on doc/running.html. Closes: #171283. Files: 4966317f92a445ebb9efcacbf4df1114 661 games optional tux-aqfh_1.0.14-3.dsc cc9ffb5dd69ab7e68137d29428282aef 8434 games optional tux-aqfh_1.0.14-3.diff.gz 2d880f7d44b1042f9f1085674e50e7e7 77188 games optional tux-aqfh_1.0.14-3_i386.deb 1fe7414d82d9e813d784c8932073a308 3476284 games optional tux-aqfh-data_1.0.14-3_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE97n33xBYivKllgY8RAnFnAKCzwMO4BA2YtTVG1PWal+v1uWpuYgCgrtns la/hr+Cob0YOlg8RuuRMd20= =mzFe -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#111923: linuxconf: segfault
On Sat, 18 May 2002 05:17:17 +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 02:58:56PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > > I can't reproduce this bug with the current version of linuxconf in > > testing and unstable, 1.26r4-2. I tried 'linuxconf --setmod treemenu' > > from a fresh install, and linuxconf started up fine and did indeed > > display the tree menu. > > > > Could you try the latest version and see if you can still reproduce > > this? > > Hi, > > Have you had a chance to look at this? Colin, I guess we can close this? (Did you get a private reply?) Thanks, Matej
Bug#161903: marked as done (linuxconf: broken dependency on libgd1)
Your message dated 05 Dec 2002 03:51:19 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#161903: fixed in linuxconf 1.26r4-2.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2002 13:53:11 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 22 08:53:11 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (smtp.inode.at) [62.99.194.4] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17t7Ad-0008RB-00; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 08:53:11 -0500 Received: from line-e-139.adsl-dynamic.inode.at ([62.99.165.139]:32838 helo=localhost) by smtp.inode.at with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17t796-kO-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 15:51:36 +0200 Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BA63EAE11; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 15:52:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 15:52:11 +0200 From: Matthias Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: linuxconf: broken dependency on libgd1 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]@inode.at> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: linuxconf Version: 1.26r4-2 When I invoke: apt-get install linuxconf I get: Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: linuxconf: Depends: libgd1 (>= 1.8.4-7) E: Sorry, broken packages After installing libgd1-xpm manually and and installing linuxconf with: dpkg -i --force-depends linuxconf_ the package installed and worked fine. It seems that something is broken in the virtual package libgd1. I'm using Debian GNU/Linux unstable. matthias --- Received: (at 161903-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Dec 2002 02:51:36 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 04 20:51:32 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18Jm6o-0002hN-00; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 20:51:26 -0600 Received: from fuzz.uucp (a1531.cmu.carnet.hr [193.198.140.92]) by jagor.srce.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id gB52o7U7023387 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 03:50:10 +0100 (MET) Received: from mvela by fuzz.uucp with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18Jm6h-6H-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 05 Dec 2002 03:51:19 +0100 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug#161903: fixed in linuxconf 1.26r4-2.1 Date: 05 Dec 2002 03:51:19 +0100 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lines: 6 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter at jagor.srce.hr Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: The dependency got fixed when the package was recompiled with a current libgd-dev. Thanks, Matej
Bug#93202: marked as done (linuxconf produces line splits in /etc/group)
Your message dated 05 Dec 2002 03:51:13 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#93202: fixed in linuxconf 1.18r1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Apr 2001 11:13:27 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 07 06:13:27 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from isis.wu-wien.ac.at [137.208.3.42] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14lqel-0001ER-00; Sat, 07 Apr 2001 06:13:27 -0500 Received: from wu-wien.ac.at (212186109069.14.wu-wien.teleweb.at [212.186.109.69]) by isis.wu-wien.ac.at (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA67616 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; emf [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 13:13:24 +0200 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2001 13:09:43 +0200 From: christian buchta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.18 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: linuxconf produces line splits in /etc/group Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: linuxconf Version: 1.17r5-2 we have a problem in conjunction with the following (?) packages: login 19990827-20 libpam-modules 0.72-9 libpam-runtime 0.72-9 libpam0g 0.72-9 linuxconf 1.17r5-2 we use: Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 with 2.2.18-raid-mosix (custom kernel with raid and mosix patches for kernel 2.2.18). problem: we have a unix group on the system where the line defining the group in /etc/group is around 180 characters long. manipulating the group definition with linuxconf the line is split with \ after approximately 90 characters . this has the effect that users who are listed after the split will not be in this group after login. nevertheless they can become a member of the `missing' group with the newgrp command. if I eliminate the split by hand, such that the definition is a single line, everything is fine again. It seems that the program(s) doing the login/authentication (from the login/pam packages?) has (have) a problem with the parsing of splitted lines in the group file, but newgrp (login package) does not seem to have it? A fix depends on whichever of login/pam/linuxconf one may judge to be the `culprit', but maybe fixing linuxconf to write `proper' lines to /etc/group is the easier fix ... gc --- Received: (at 93202-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Dec 2002 02:51:34 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 04 20:51:22 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18Jm6j-0002hI-00; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 20:51:22 -0600 Received: from fuzz.uucp (a1531.cmu.carnet.hr [193.198.140.92]) by jagor.srce.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id gB52o7U7023384 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 03:50:10 +0100 (MET) Received: from mvela by fuzz.uucp with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18Jm6b-69-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 05 Dec 2002 03:51:13 +0100 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug#93202: fixed in linuxconf 1.18r1 Date: 05 Dec 2002 03:51:13 +0100 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lines: 5 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter at jagor.srce.hr Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Quoting the upstream changelog for 1.18r1: Group edition: member list /etc/group is not rewritten using to break long lines.
