nase-a60_0.20a-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: nase-a60_0.20a-3.diff.gz to pool/main/n/nase-a60/nase-a60_0.20a-3.diff.gz nase-a60_0.20a-3.dsc to pool/main/n/nase-a60/nase-a60_0.20a-3.dsc nase-a60_0.20a-3_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nase-a60/nase-a60_0.20a-3_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 170161 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Bug#167886: marked as done (tux-aqfh-data: should replace older versions of tux-aqfh )
Your message dated Sun, 01 Dec 2002 06:17:22 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#167886: fixed in tux-aqfh 1.0.14-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2002 15:23:15 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 05 09:23:15 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from pool-141-156-220-14.res.east.verizon.net (ucko.debian.net) [141.156.220.14] (foobar) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 1895Xt-0005a0-00; Tue, 05 Nov 2002 09:23:13 -0600 Received: from amu by ucko.debian.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1895Xr-0006lC-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 05 Nov 2002 10:23:11 -0500 From: Aaron M. Ucko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: tux-aqfh-data: should replace older versions of tux-aqfh X-Debbugs-CC: Aaron M. Ucko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 05 Nov 2002 10:23:09 -0500 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lines: 23 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: "Aaron M. Ucko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: tux-aqfh-data Version: 1.0.14-1 Severity: normal Hi. tux-aqfh-data's control stanza should contain Replaces: tux-aqfh (<< 1.0.14) to allow proper upgrading; as it is, I get > Unpacking tux-aqfh-data (from .../tux-aqfh-data_1.0.14-1_all.deb) ... > dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/tux-aqfh-data_1.0.14-1_all.deb > (--unpack): > trying to overwrite `/usr/share/games/tux_aqfh/wavs/ahh.wav', which is also > in package tux-aqfh > dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) tux-aqfh did manage to get upgraded, so running "apt-get -f install" restored sanity; still, the upgrade should have worked in one pass. Thanks. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux tux 2.4.19 #1 Sun Sep 29 19:11:39 EDT 2002 i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux --- Received: (at 167886-close) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Dec 2002 11:23:45 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 01 05:23:44 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18ISCO-bs-00; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 05:23:44 -0600 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 18IS6E-0003NC-00; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 06:17:22 -0500 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.28 $ Subject: Bug#167886: fixed in tux-aqfh 1.0.14-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2002 06:17:22 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of tux-aqfh, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: tux-aqfh-data_1.0.14-2_all.deb to pool/main/t/tux-aqfh/tux-aqfh-data_1.0.14-2_all.deb tux-aqfh_1.0.14-2.diff.gz to pool/main/t/tux-aqfh/tux-aqfh_1.0.14-2.diff.gz tux-aqfh_1.0.14-2.dsc to pool/main/t/tux-aqfh/tux-aqfh_1.0.14-2.dsc tux-aqfh_1.0.14-2_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tux-aqfh/tux-aqfh_1.0.14-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated tux-aqfh package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 23:27:55 +0100 Source: tux-aqfh Binary: tux-aqfh-data tux-aqfh Architecture: source i386 all Version: 1.0.14-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: tux-aqfh - 3D Puzzle Game with Tux the Penguin tux-aqfh-data - Data files for Tux: A quest for herring Closes: 167886 Changes: tux-aqfh (1.0.14-2) unstable; urgency=low . * QA upload. * Make tux-aqfh-data replace tux-aqfh (<< 1
Bug#170161: marked as done (nase-a60: Build-Depends on xlib6g*)
Your message dated Sun, 01 Dec 2002 06:17:11 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#170161: fixed in nase-a60 0.20a-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Nov 2002 02:38:16 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 21 20:38:00 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.122] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18F3hf-0005XO-00; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 20:37:59 -0600 Received: from user-vcaunmd.dsl.mindspring.com ([216.175.94.205] helo=frobnitz.ddts.net) by pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18F3he-0006Mk-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 18:37:58 -0800 Received: from daniel by frobnitz.ddts.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18F3he-0004au-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 18:37:58 -0800 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: nase-a60: Build-Depends on xlib6g* From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 18:37:58 -0800 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: nase-a60 Severity: normal (This is an automatically generated bug, based on the current contents of the Sources file for the main section.) This source package contains a build dependency on xlib6g-dev. This needs to be updated since the xlib6g* packages will disappear by the time of the next release. Be aware that, in addition to xlibs-dev, you may also need to specify libxaw7-dev. Also, if your source package uses imake, you will need to specify xutils as well. --- Received: (at 170161-close) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Dec 2002 11:23:18 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 01 05:23:17 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18ISBx-Rx-00; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 05:23:17 -0600 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 18IS63-0003MY-00; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 06:17:11 -0500 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.28 $ Subject: Bug#170161: fixed in nase-a60 0.20a-3 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2002 06:17:11 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of nase-a60, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: nase-a60_0.20a-3.diff.gz to pool/main/n/nase-a60/nase-a60_0.20a-3.diff.gz nase-a60_0.20a-3.dsc to pool/main/n/nase-a60/nase-a60_0.20a-3.dsc nase-a60_0.20a-3_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nase-a60/nase-a60_0.20a-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated nase-a60 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 11:57:36 +0100 Source: nase-a60 Binary: nase-a60 Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.20a-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: nase-a60 - An Algol-60 interpreter Closes: 170161 Changes: nase-a60 (0.20a-3) unstable; urgency=low . * QA upload. * Replace xlib6g-dev build dependency with xlibs-dev and libxaw7-dev. Closes: #170161. * Convert to debhelper. * debian/copyright: - Log of changes is no longer mandatory. - /usr/doc/copyright/GPL has moved to /usr/share/common-licenses. * Conforms to Standards version 3.5.8. Files: 1eb99ae8aaf08178e0d3f622cd7d5b04 601 interpreters extra nase-a60_0.20a-3.dsc 3dc9e38e6fe0f9a30a95ad7c0a13c105 3834 interpreters extra nase-a60_0.20a-3.diff.gz cc13f470318e1276f39bb544b1f2d33e 169640 interpreters
Re: Bug#167886: marked as done (tux-aqfh-data: should replace older versions of tux-aqfh )
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 05:33:18AM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > tux-aqfh (1.0.14-2) unstable; urgency=low > . >* QA upload. >* Make tux-aqfh-data replace tux-aqfh (<< 1.0.14-1) to avoid conflicts > on upgrade. Closes: #167886. >* Remove undocumented(7) symlink for tux_aqfh(6). Its lack has been > reported as #171283; add Lintian override. >* Conforms to Standards version 3.5.8. Why the Lintian override? If there's no man page, the error should stay there without being overridden so that it appears on summaries like http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#170161: marked as done (nase-a60: Build-Depends on xlib6g*)
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 05:33:20AM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > - /usr/doc/copyright/GPL has moved to /usr/share/common-licenses. Impressive. I don't believe I've seen one of these fixed since the last millenium... :) -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Processed: svgalib housekeeping
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 125819 normal Bug#125819: zgv: zgv hangs my graphic card Severity set to `normal'. > retitle 125819 svgalib: doesn't switch back to framebuffer mode Bug#125819: zgv: zgv hangs my graphic card Changed Bug title. > forwarded 149197 Matan Ziv-Av <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug#149197: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: SVGALib gl_expandcharacter() with 3 bytes per pixel] Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to Matan Ziv-Av <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#159210: marked as done (svgalib-bin: typo in package description)
Your message dated 01 Dec 2002 21:13:52 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#159210: fixed in svgalib 1:1.4.3-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Sep 2002 19:19:23 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 01 14:19:23 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.libertysurf.net [213.36.80.91] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17laFn-0006av-00; Sun, 01 Sep 2002 14:19:23 -0500 Received: from bertol (212.232.51.4) by mail.libertysurf.net (6.5.026) id 3D50909B0028789D for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 21:18:52 +0200 Received: from nico by bertol with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17laFH-0001TI-00; Sun, 01 Sep 2002 21:18:51 +0200 Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 21:18:51 +0200 From: Nicolas Bertolissio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: svgalib-bin: typo in package description Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50 Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: svgalib-bin Version: N/A; reported 2002-09-01 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, X Window has no leading =AB s =BB, ortherwise it's Window$ from m$. Regards Nicolas Bertolissio --- svgalib-bin 2002-09-01 21:16:25.0 +0200 +++ svgalib-bin.new 2002-09-01 21:16:42.0 +0200 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Description: Console SVGA display utilities svgalib provides graphics capabilities to programs running on the - system console, without going through X Windows. It uses direct + system console, without going through X Window. It uses direct access to the video hardware to provide low-level access to the standard VGA and SVGA graphics modes. Only works with some video hardware; use with caution. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux bertol 2.4.19 #3 SMP dim ao=FB 25 15:35:27 CEST 2002 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] --=20 --- Received: (at 159210-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Dec 2002 19:07:51 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 01 13:07:51 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18IZRW-0003Fo-00; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 13:07:51 -0600 Received: from fuzz.uucp (a1679.cmu.carnet.hr [193.198.141.119]) by jagor.srce.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id gB1J6V72020697 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 1 Dec 2002 20:06:39 +0100 (MET) Received: from mvela by fuzz.uucp with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18IaTQ-0006jQ-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 21:13:52 +0100 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug#159210: fixed in svgalib 1:1.4.3-7 Date: 01 Dec 2002 21:13:52 +0100 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lines: 8 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter at jagor.srce.hr Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Here is the relevant changelog entry: svgalib (1:1.4.3-7) unstable; urgency=low [...] * Refer to the X Window System correctly (closes: #124200). -- Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 29 Mar 2002 04:36:58 +
ines_2.2-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: ines_2.2-1.diff.gz to pool/non-free/i/ines/ines_2.2-1.diff.gz ines_2.2-1.dsc to pool/non-free/i/ines/ines_2.2-1.dsc ines_2.2-1_i386.deb to pool/non-free/i/ines/ines_2.2-1_i386.deb ines_2.2.orig.tar.gz to pool/non-free/i/ines/ines_2.2.orig.tar.gz Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99f-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99f-1.diff.gz to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99f-1.diff.gz elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99f-1.dsc to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99f-1.dsc elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99f-1_i386.deb to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99f-1_i386.deb elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99f.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99f.orig.tar.gz Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 169849 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Re: svgalib-bin
"Pascal de Bruijn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've installed svgalib-bin (with testing/sarge). I need to use the vesa > driver for my card. I get the following svgalib error: > svgalib: FATAL internal error: > Set MAX_REGS at least to 11196 in src/driver.h and recompile everything. Just for the record, which card are you using? > Could you please fix this. I'll try to do an upload by Tuesday. BTW, please use our Bug Tracking System to report problems. The reportbug package provides a nice interface. Thanks, Matej
Bug#169849: marked as done (elm-me+: STRING PANIC: Index out of array)
Your message dated Sun, 01 Dec 2002 14:17:14 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#169849: fixed in elm-me+ 2.4pl25ME+99f-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Nov 2002 04:59:51 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 19 22:59:50 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from user-0ccerf2.cable.mindspring.com (a750.nahmias.net)
[24.199.109.226]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18EMxq-0005bK-00; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 22:59:50 -0600
Received: by a750.nahmias.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id AA6B1E80C; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:09:37 -0500 (EST)
From: Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: elm-me+: STRING PANIC: Index out of array
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:09:37 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: elm-me+
Version: 2.4pl25ME+99c-3
Severity: normal
I was trying to send a mail from elm, and got the following error message:
--
STRING PANIC: Index out of array
STRING PANIC in cs_binary.c:1043:cs_give_unicode_from_ascii
>>>Index out of array
Emergency exit taken! All temp files intact!
This bug is reproducible by doing the following:
1) Compose a new message ('m' from the main screen).
2) Give it any destination address and subject.
3) After editing the message, you will be at the "Mail Pre-Send Screen".
4) Press 'h' to go to the "Message Header Edit Screen".
5) Type 'i' to edit the "I)n-reply-to:" header.
6) Finally, press the '?' key [Shift-/] and then [enter].
6a) Or, for variety, try pressing the space bar and then [enter].
7) Watch elm crash with the above message. :-(
Also, I've noticed that whatever I type in for this header is discarded...
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux a750.nahmias.net 2.4.19 #1 Sat Oct 19 23:55:05 EDT 2002
i686 AMD Athlon(tm) Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
Versions of the packages elm-me+ depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.5-14.3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii libncurses55.2.20020112a- Shared libraries for terminal handling
ii libssl0.9.60.9.6g-6 SSL shared libraries
eximNot installed or no info
ri postfix1.1.11.0-3 A high-performance mail transport agent
^^^ (Provides virtual package mail-transport-agent)
---
Received: (at 169849-close) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Dec 2002 19:23:22 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 01 13:23:21 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18IZgX-00045z-00; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 13:23:21 -0600
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 18IZac-0008JZ-00; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 14:17:14 -0500
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.28 $
Subject: Bug#169849: fixed in elm-me+ 2.4pl25ME+99f-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2002 14:17:14 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
elm-me+, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99f-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99f-1.diff.gz
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99f-1.dsc
to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99f-1.dsc
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99f-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99f-1_i386.deb
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99f.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99f.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated elm-me+ package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun,
Re: Bug#167886: marked as done (tux-aqfh-data: should replace older versions of tux-aqfh )
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 05:33:18AM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > tux-aqfh (1.0.14-2) unstable; urgency=low > > . > >* QA upload. > >* Make tux-aqfh-data replace tux-aqfh (<< 1.0.14-1) to avoid conflicts > > on upgrade. Closes: #167886. > >* Remove undocumented(7) symlink for tux_aqfh(6). Its lack has been > > reported as #171283; add Lintian override. > >* Conforms to Standards version 3.5.8. > > Why the Lintian override? I was under the impression packages with Lintian errors are a big no-no. Overriding link-to-undocumented-manpage was acceptable: W: tux-aqfh: link-to-undocumented-manpage usr/share/man/man6/tux_aqfh.6.gz N: N: Symbolic links to the undocumented(7) manual page may be provided only N: when a bug has been filed that no manual page is available. If you N: like, you may report the bug yourself, and add an override for this N: warning in your package. N: [...] If we override binary-without-manpage for reported bugs, it'll be easy to spot unreported ones. > If there's no man page, the error should stay there without being > overridden so that it appears on summaries like > http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html. How did it work in the undocumented(7) days then? Thanks, Matej
seaview_20021127-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: seaview_20021127-1.diff.gz to pool/contrib/s/seaview/seaview_20021127-1.diff.gz seaview_20021127-1.dsc to pool/contrib/s/seaview/seaview_20021127-1.dsc seaview_20021127-1_i386.deb to pool/contrib/s/seaview/seaview_20021127-1_i386.deb seaview_20021127.orig.tar.gz to pool/contrib/s/seaview/seaview_20021127.orig.tar.gz Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
seaview override disparity
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): seaview_20021127-1_i386.deb: section is overridden from contrib/science to contrib/misc. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why. [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.] -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
ubit_2.11.0-1_i386.changes is NEW
libubit-dev_2.11.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/u/ubit/libubit-dev_2.11.0-1_i386.deb (new) libubit2.11.0_2.11.0-1_i386.deb optional libs Ubiquitous Brick Interactive Toolkit Ubit is a new graphical library. It is a brick construction game model for creating graphical user interfaces. ubit_2.11.0-1.diff.gz to pool/main/u/ubit/ubit_2.11.0-1.diff.gz ubit_2.11.0-1.dsc to pool/main/u/ubit/ubit_2.11.0-1.dsc ubit_2.11.0.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/u/ubit/ubit_2.11.0.orig.tar.gz Changes: ubit (2.11.0-1) unstable; urgency=low . * QA upload. * New upstream release. * Conforms to Standards version 3.5.8. Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New packages are usually added to the override file about once a week. You may have gotten the distribution wrong. You'll get warnings above if files already exist in other distributions.
svgalib_1.4.3-11_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: svgalib-bin_1.4.3-11_i386.deb to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib-bin_1.4.3-11_i386.deb svgalib1-altdev_1.4.3-11_i386.deb to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib1-altdev_1.4.3-11_i386.deb svgalib1_1.4.3-11_i386.deb to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib1_1.4.3-11_i386.deb svgalib_1.4.3-11.diff.gz to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib_1.4.3-11.diff.gz svgalib_1.4.3-11.dsc to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib_1.4.3-11.dsc svgalibg1-dev_1.4.3-11_i386.deb to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalibg1-dev_1.4.3-11_i386.deb svgalibg1_1.4.3-11_i386.deb to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalibg1_1.4.3-11_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 109682 66775 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Re: Bug#167886: marked as done (tux-aqfh-data: should replace older versions of tux-aqfh )
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:36:34AM +0100, Matej Vela wrote: > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 05:33:18AM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > > tux-aqfh (1.0.14-2) unstable; urgency=low > > > . > > >* QA upload. > > >* Make tux-aqfh-data replace tux-aqfh (<< 1.0.14-1) to avoid conflicts > > > on upgrade. Closes: #167886. > > >* Remove undocumented(7) symlink for tux_aqfh(6). Its lack has been > > > reported as #171283; add Lintian override. > > >* Conforms to Standards version 3.5.8. > > > > Why the Lintian override? > > I was under the impression packages with Lintian errors are a big no-no. In this case it's partly a Lintian bug. The link-to-undocumented-manpage warning should be removed altogether, as policy has been amended to no longer recommend the use of undocumented(7). As for leaving the binary-without-manpage error there, please do! It's not completely out of order to have packages with Lintian errors, in the same way that it's not out of order to have packages with bugs; we just have to acknowledge that they *are* bugs. Overriding the error isn't such an acknowledgement, it's saying that Lintian is wrong in this particular case and should be quiet. Basically, the package still has the bug that the man page isn't present, so Lintian's output should continue to mention it. I've written man pages for packages more than once after noticing a complaint from Lintian. > Overriding link-to-undocumented-manpage was acceptable: > > W: tux-aqfh: link-to-undocumented-manpage usr/share/man/man6/tux_aqfh.6.gz > N: > N: Symbolic links to the undocumented(7) manual page may be provided only > N: when a bug has been filed that no manual page is available. If you > N: like, you may report the bug yourself, and add an override for this > N: warning in your package. > N: Bleh, I disagree with that text. :-) Shaleh was generally consistent in saying that overrides should only be used for cases where an exception needs to be made to an otherwise correct general rule, and not to hide Lintian bugs or package bugs. I don't know what Joy thinks, but this has certainly been the guideline in the past. (I wonder if that text was my fault ... if so, oops.) > If we override binary-without-manpage for reported bugs, it'll be easy > to spot unreported ones. But we won't see the reported ones in the overall list that way. > > If there's no man page, the error should stay there without being > > overridden so that it appears on summaries like > > http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html. > > How did it work in the undocumented(7) days then? People generally didn't override the warning. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#66775: marked as done (Profiling doesnt work with svgalib)
Your message dated Sun, 01 Dec 2002 19:02:30 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#66775: fixed in svgalib 1:1.4.3-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jul 2000 21:44:29 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 05 16:44:28 2000 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from canax2-016.dialup.optusnet.com.au (grunge.hpy.hell) [198.142.242.16] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian)) id 139wy2-0008Lu-00; Wed, 05 Jul 2000 16:44:27 -0500 Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by grunge.hpy.hell (8.10.1/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-6) with ESMTP id e65LhO900571 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 07:43:29 +1000 X-Authentication-Warning: grunge.hpy.hell: davey owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 07:43:24 +1000 (EST) From: David Murn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Profiling doesnt work with svgalib Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: svgalib Version: 1.4.1 When a program is compiled with -pg, for profiling support and linked with svgalib, the program aborts abnormally. The reason, is because svgalib has defined SIGPROF as SVGALIB_RELEASE_SIG. This means when the display is initialized, a signal handler is setup, when the profiling signal is sent, the display is not completely set up, so it cannot be restored to text mode, thus leaving the display in an unusable state. The easiest fix I can see is, at the end of src/libvga.h, change the #if 0 to #if 1. Line 1286 of src/vga.c has SIGPROF commented out, as it should be, however it is used by SVGALIB_RELEASE_SIG, so it still causes problems. Davey --- Received: (at 66775-close) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2002 00:08:02 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 01 18:08:02 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18Ie82-0001P1-00; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 18:08:02 -0600 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 18Ie2g-0004mm-00; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 19:02:30 -0500 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.28 $ Subject: Bug#66775: fixed in svgalib 1:1.4.3-11 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2002 19:02:30 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of svgalib, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: svgalib-bin_1.4.3-11_i386.deb to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib-bin_1.4.3-11_i386.deb svgalib1-altdev_1.4.3-11_i386.deb to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib1-altdev_1.4.3-11_i386.deb svgalib1_1.4.3-11_i386.deb to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib1_1.4.3-11_i386.deb svgalib_1.4.3-11.diff.gz to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib_1.4.3-11.diff.gz svgalib_1.4.3-11.dsc to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib_1.4.3-11.dsc svgalibg1-dev_1.4.3-11_i386.deb to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalibg1-dev_1.4.3-11_i386.deb svgalibg1_1.4.3-11_i386.deb to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalibg1_1.4.3-11_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated svgalib package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 00:30:43 +0100 Source: svgalib Binary: svgalib1-altdev svgalib1 svgalibg1-dev svgalibg1 svgalib-bin Architecture: source i386 Version: 1:1.4.3-11 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: svgalib-bin - Console SVGA display utilities svgalib1 - Console SVGA display libraries (for libc5) svgalib1-altdev - Console SVGA display development libraries and headers (for libc5 svgalibg1 - Console SVGA display libraries svgalibg1
Bug#109682: marked as done (svgakeymap -- Couldn't find /usr/share/keymaps/us.map.gz)
Your message dated Sun, 01 Dec 2002 19:02:30 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#109682: fixed in svgalib 1:1.4.3-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Aug 2001 20:56:29 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 22 15:56:29 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from arroz.onshored.com [216.220.101.2] (postfix) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15Zf37-0003oy-00; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 15:56:29 -0500 Received: from arroz.onshored.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arroz.onshored.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A62093806 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 16:55:31 -0400 (EDT) Sender: adam@arroz.onshored.com To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: svgakeymap -- Couldn't find /usr/share/keymaps/us.map.gz Organization: onShore Development, Inc From: Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 22 Aug 2001 16:55:31 -0400 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lines: 21 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: svgalib-bin Version: 1:1.4.3-2 Severity: normal svgakeymap doesn't seem to work anymore: # svgakeymap Couldn't find /usr/share/keymaps/us.map.gz . at /usr/bin/svgakeymap line 46. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux frijole 2.2.18pre21 #1 Sat Nov 18 18:47:15 EST 2000 i586 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages svgalib-bin depends on: ii libc6 2.2.4-1GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii svgalibg1 1:1.4.3-2 Console SVGA display utilities --- Received: (at 109682-close) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2002 00:08:03 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 01 18:08:03 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18Ie83-0001PN-00; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 18:08:03 -0600 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 18Ie2g-0004mk-00; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 19:02:30 -0500 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.28 $ Subject: Bug#109682: fixed in svgalib 1:1.4.3-11 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2002 19:02:30 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of svgalib, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: svgalib-bin_1.4.3-11_i386.deb to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib-bin_1.4.3-11_i386.deb svgalib1-altdev_1.4.3-11_i386.deb to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib1-altdev_1.4.3-11_i386.deb svgalib1_1.4.3-11_i386.deb to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib1_1.4.3-11_i386.deb svgalib_1.4.3-11.diff.gz to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib_1.4.3-11.diff.gz svgalib_1.4.3-11.dsc to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib_1.4.3-11.dsc svgalibg1-dev_1.4.3-11_i386.deb to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalibg1-dev_1.4.3-11_i386.deb svgalibg1_1.4.3-11_i386.deb to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalibg1_1.4.3-11_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated svgalib package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 00:30:43 +0100 Source: svgalib Binary: svgalib1-altdev svgalib1 svgalibg1-dev svgalibg1 svgalib-bin Architecture: source i386 Version: 1:1.4.3-11 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: svgalib-bin - Console SVGA display utilities svgalib1 - Console SVGA display libraries (for libc5) svgalib1-altdev - Console SVGA display development libraries and headers (for libc5 svgalibg1 - Console SVGA display libraries svgalibg1-dev - Console SVGA display development libraries and headers Closes: 66775 109682 Changes: svgal
Re: Bug#167886: marked as done (tux-aqfh-data: should replace older versions of tux-aqfh )
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:15:37AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > In this case it's partly a Lintian bug. The link-to-undocumented-manpage > warning should be removed altogether, as policy has been amended to no > longer recommend the use of undocumented(7). Erm... isn't this exactly the reason to warn even more about having undocumented(7) symlinks? :) > > Overriding link-to-undocumented-manpage was acceptable: > > > > W: tux-aqfh: link-to-undocumented-manpage usr/share/man/man6/tux_aqfh.6.gz > > N: > > N: Symbolic links to the undocumented(7) manual page may be provided > > only > > N: when a bug has been filed that no manual page is available. If you > > N: like, you may report the bug yourself, and add an override for this > > N: warning in your package. > > N: > > Bleh, I disagree with that text. :-) Shaleh was generally consistent in > saying that overrides should only be used for cases where an exception > needs to be made to an otherwise correct general rule, and not to hide > Lintian bugs or package bugs. I don't know what Joy thinks, but this has > certainly been the guideline in the past. > > (I wonder if that text was my fault ... if so, oops.) I'm not sure where that description was going... I'll rephrase it to simply say that even if there's a undocumented(7) symlink, there's still no manual page and one should be written. Which reminds me, gotta fix the upgrading checklist, it says that not having manual pages has become a bug -- it's been a bug all along. -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Re: Bug#167886: marked as done (tux-aqfh-data: should replace older versions of tux-aqfh )
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 02:01:36AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:15:37AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > > In this case it's partly a Lintian bug. The link-to-undocumented-manpage > > warning should be removed altogether, as policy has been amended to no > > longer recommend the use of undocumented(7). > > Erm... isn't this exactly the reason to warn even more about having > undocumented(7) symlinks? :) Well, raised to an error then; policy doesn't forbid undocumented(7), it just doesn't recommend it any more. I don't think the proposal would have made it into policy if it had done the former, as you're probably aware. :) > I'm not sure where that description was going... I'll rephrase it to simply > say that even if there's a undocumented(7) symlink, there's still no manual > page and one should be written. Cool, thanks. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tux-aqfh_1.0.14-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: tux-aqfh-data_1.0.14-2_all.deb to pool/main/t/tux-aqfh/tux-aqfh-data_1.0.14-2_all.deb tux-aqfh_1.0.14-2.diff.gz to pool/main/t/tux-aqfh/tux-aqfh_1.0.14-2.diff.gz tux-aqfh_1.0.14-2.dsc to pool/main/t/tux-aqfh/tux-aqfh_1.0.14-2.dsc tux-aqfh_1.0.14-2_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tux-aqfh/tux-aqfh_1.0.14-2_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 167886 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
