libg++27 override disparity

2002-10-08 Thread Debian Installer 
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):

libg++27-altdev_2.7.2.1-18_i386.deb: priority is overridden from optional to 
extra.

Either the package or the override file is incorrect.  If you think
the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package
so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload.  If you feel the
override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why.

[NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one
like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore
this mail.  Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in
due course, but until then the installer will send these automated
mails; sorry.]

--
Debian distribution maintenance software

(This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there
is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by
mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])

libg++27_2.7.2.1-18_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2002-10-08 Thread Debian Installer 

Accepted:
libg++27-altdev_2.7.2.1-18_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libg/libg++27/libg++27-altdev_2.7.2.1-18_i386.deb
libg++27_2.7.2.1-18.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libg/libg++27/libg++27_2.7.2.1-18.diff.gz
libg++27_2.7.2.1-18.dsc
  to pool/main/libg/libg++27/libg++27_2.7.2.1-18.dsc
libg++27_2.7.2.1-18_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libg/libg++27/libg++27_2.7.2.1-18_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 162375 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Bug#162375: marked as done (FTBFS: Build failure of libg++27 on i386)

2002-10-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 08 Oct 2002 02:47:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#162375: fixed in libg++27 2.7.2.1-18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Sep 2002 01:23:12 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 25 20:23:12 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mikilab.doshisha.ac.jp [202.23.156.50] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17uNN1-0007o8-00; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 20:23:11 -0500
Received: from atoron.work.isl.doshisha.ac.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mikilab.doshisha.ac.jp (8.9.3/3.7W) with SMTP id KAA02355
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 10:22:40 +0900
X-Authentication-Warning: mikilab.doshisha.ac.jp: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] 
claimed to be atoron.work.isl.doshisha.ac.jp
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 10:22:55 +0900
From: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: submit bug tracking system <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FTBFS: Build failure of libg++27 on i386
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Netfort project
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.3 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: libg++27
Version: 2.7.2.1-17


libg++27 fails to build from source on i386, when doing a binary-all build.

I am filing this bug to notify you that I failed to build your
package from source. It is a serious problem that your source does not 
build from source using the information provided in your control files,
and such a package should not be distributed in a stable Debian distribution.

This build was done using pbuilder package.


Build log follows:
===
install -g root -o root -m 644 ./libg++/libg++.a ./libstdc++/libstdc++.a\
 debian/tmp-devel/usr/i486-linuxlibc1/lib/
#
#
ln -s ../../lib/libc5-compat/libg++.so.27.2.1
debian/tmp-devel/usr/i486-linuxlibc1/lib/libg++.so
ln -s ../../lib/libc5-compat/libstdc++.so.27.2.1 
debian/tmp-devel/usr/i486-linuxlibc1/lib/libstdc++.so
cd libstdc++; cp cassert cctype cerrno cfloat ciso646 climits clocale cmath 
complex csetjmp csignal cstdarg cstddef cstdio cstdlib cstring ctime cwchar 
cwctype new stddef string exception stdexcept typeinfo algorithm deque list map 
queue set stack vector utility functional iterator memory numeric 
../debian/tmp-devel/usr/i486-linuxlibc1/include/g++
cd libio; cp PlotFile.h SFile.h builtinbuf.h editbuf.h fstream.h indstream.h 
iomanip.h iostream.h istream.h ostream.h parsestream.h pfstream.h procbuf.h 
stdiostream.h stream.h streambuf.h strfile.h strstream.h 
../debian/tmp-devel/usr/i486-linuxlibc1/include/g++
cp libstdc++{,/stl}/*.h libg++/src/*.h \
debian/tmp-devel/usr/i486-linuxlibc1/include/g++
cp: will not overwrite just-created 
`debian/tmp-devel/usr/i486-linuxlibc1/include/g++/bool.h' with 
`libg++/src/bool.h'
make: *** [binary-devel] Error 1
===


regards,
   junichi


-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer




---
Received: (at 162375-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2002 06:55:20 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 08 01:55:20 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17yoH1-00040m-00; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 01:55:19 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 17yo9K-0007Hq-00; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 02:47:22 -0400
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.26 $
Subject: Bug#162375: fixed in libg++27 2.7.2.1-18
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 02:47:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libg++27, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libg++27-altdev_2.7.2.1-18_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libg/libg++27/libg++27-altdev_2.7.2.1-18_i386.deb
libg++27_2.7.2.1-18.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libg/libg++27/libg++27_2.7.2.1-18.diff.gz
libg++27_2.7.2.1-18.dsc
  to pool/main/libg/libg++27/libg++27_2.7.2.1-18.dsc
libg++27_2.7.2.1-18_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libg/libg++27/libg++27_2.7.2.1-18_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the prev

flick override disparity

2002-10-08 Thread Debian Installer 
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):

flick-doc_2.1-3_all.deb: section is overridden from doc to devel.

Either the package or the override file is incorrect.  If you think
the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package
so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload.  If you feel the
override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why.

[NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one
like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore
this mail.  Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in
due course, but until then the installer will send these automated
mails; sorry.]

--
Debian distribution maintenance software

(This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there
is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by
mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])

flick_2.1-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2002-10-08 Thread Debian Installer 

Accepted:
flick-dev_2.1-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/f/flick/flick-dev_2.1-3_i386.deb
flick-doc_2.1-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/f/flick/flick-doc_2.1-3_all.deb
flick_2.1-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/f/flick/flick_2.1-3.diff.gz
flick_2.1-3.dsc
  to pool/main/f/flick/flick_2.1-3.dsc
flick_2.1-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/f/flick/flick_2.1-3_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 163438 163458 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Bug#163438: marked as done (flick_2.1-2(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: missing rules in makefile?)

2002-10-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 08 Oct 2002 03:17:12 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#163438: fixed in flick 2.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Oct 2002 18:11:12 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 05 13:11:12 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from atlrel6.hp.com [156.153.255.205] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17xtOS-0005iv-00; Sat, 05 Oct 2002 13:11:12 -0500
Received: from debian.fc.hp.com (whatone.fc.hp.com [15.238.0.60])
by atlrel6.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4EE3A7
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat,  5 Oct 2002 14:11:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by debian.fc.hp.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 497B11D4825; Sat,  5 Oct 2002 12:11:11 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 12:11:11 -0600
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: flick_2.1-2(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: missing rules in makefile?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: flick
Version: 2.1-2
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of flick_2.1-2 on sarti by sbuild/hppa 1.169
> Build started at 20021004-1331

[...]

> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4), bison, flex

[...]

>  The following central src deps are (probably) missing:
>   tetex-bin, tetex-extra

[...]

> make[2]: Leaving directory 
> `/build/buildd/flick-2.1/obj/runtime/libraries/link/suntcp'
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/flick-2.1/obj'
> > build-arch-stamp
> dh_testdir
> /usr/bin/make -C obj/doc/guts html
> make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/flick-2.1/obj/doc/guts'
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/flick-2.1/obj/doc/guts'
> make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/flick-2.1/obj/doc/guts'
> /usr/bin/make TARGET=guts.html
> make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/flick-2.1/obj/doc/guts'
> make[2]: *** No rule to make target `guts-html.tex', needed by `guts.tex'.  
> Stop.
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/flick-2.1/obj/doc/guts'
> make[1]: *** [html] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/flick-2.1/obj/doc/guts'
> make: *** [build-indep-stamp] Error 2

A full build log can be found at:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=hppa&pkg=flick&ver=2.1-2


---
Received: (at 163438-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2002 07:23:07 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 08 02:23:07 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17yoht-0005LG-00; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 02:23:05 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 17yocC-kJ-00; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 03:17:12 -0400
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.26 $
Subject: Bug#163438: fixed in flick 2.1-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 03:17:12 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
flick, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

flick-dev_2.1-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/f/flick/flick-dev_2.1-3_i386.deb
flick-doc_2.1-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/f/flick/flick-doc_2.1-3_all.deb
flick_2.1-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/f/flick/flick_2.1-3.diff.gz
flick_2.1-3.dsc
  to pool/main/f/flick/flick_2.1-3.dsc
flick_2.1-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/f/flick/flick_2.1-3_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated flick package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue,  8 Oct 2002 08:40:00 +0200
Source: flick
Binary: flick-dev flick flick-doc
Architecture: source i386 all

Bug#163458: marked as done (flick_2.1-2(m68k/unstable/thing2): FTBFS, missing build-dep)

2002-10-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 08 Oct 2002 03:17:12 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#163458: fixed in flick 2.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Oct 2002 21:42:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 05 16:42:16 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail128.mail.bellsouth.net (imf28bis.bellsouth.net) 
[205.152.58.88] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17xwgi-nG-00; Sat, 05 Oct 2002 16:42:16 -0500
Received: from loki ([216.78.168.67]) by imf28bis.bellsouth.net
  (InterMail vM.5.01.04.19 201-253-122-122-119-20020516) with ESMTP
  id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 17:41:01 -0400
Received: from marenks by loki with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 17xwgD-zU-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 05 Oct 2002 16:41:45 -0500
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 16:41:44 -0500
From: Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: flick_2.1-2(m68k/unstable/thing2): FTBFS, missing build-dep
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Sender: "Stephen R. Marenka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: flick
Version: 2.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch.
Tags: sid


flick fails to build from source, missing build-dep?

Here are selected excerpts from the buildd log.


| Automatic build of flick_2.1-2 on thing2 by sbuild/m68k 1.169
| Build started at 20021004-0734
| **

 [...]

| ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
| Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4), bison, flex
| Build-Depends-Indep: gs, imagemagick, tex4ht, transfig
|  Warning:
|  The following central src deps are (probably) missing:
|   tetex-bin, tetex-extra

 [...]

| make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/flick-2.1/obj/doc/guts'
| fig2dev -L ps ../../../doc/guts/aoi2mint.fig aoi2mint.eps
| make[2]: fig2dev: Command not found
| make[2]: *** [aoi2mint.eps] Error 127
| make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/flick-2.1/obj/doc/guts'
| make[1]: *** [html] Error 2
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/flick-2.1/obj/doc/guts'
| make: *** [build-indep-stamp] Error 2
| **
| Build finished at 20021004-1229
| FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
| --


A full buildd log is available at 


Other buildd logs may be available at 


--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

---
Received: (at 163458-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2002 07:23:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 08 02:23:14 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17yoi2-0005Mp-00; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 02:23:14 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 17yocC-kL-00; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 03:17:12 -0400
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.26 $
Subject: Bug#163458: fixed in flick 2.1-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 03:17:12 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
flick, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

flick-dev_2.1-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/f/flick/flick-dev_2.1-3_i386.deb
flick-doc_2.1-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/f/flick/flick-doc_2.1-3_all.deb
flick_2.1-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/f/flick/flick_2.1-3.diff.gz
flick_2.1-3.dsc
  to pool/main/f/flick/flick_2.1-3.dsc
flick_2.1-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/f/flick/flick_2.1-3_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribut

Bug#163642: wavtools: xwavr requires xmix

2002-10-08 Thread Matej Vela 
Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Pressing "Set mixer" from main screen of xwavr yields an error message
> saying that "xmix" is required. But there is neither a depends or
> suggests in the package information regarding xmix. A quick apt-cache
> search did not find it either. Nor is there a mention in the documents
> in usr/share/wavtools.

xmix was removed from woody due to release-critical bugs; you can
build the sources from unstable.  And sure, we'll add a Suggests.

Thanks,

Matej

Bug#141183: elm-me+: Please use alternatives for /usr/bin/frm

2002-10-08 Thread Matej Vela 
Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I've been talking to Jeff about what the priorities should be. Jeff has
> pointed out that the mailutils replacements of these tools integrate
> well with the rest of the mailutils package: all of these apps use a
> variable that makes them look/write mail where you specify in the
> variable, including remote imap servers, etc. If installing mailutils
> and elm made people use the elm programs by default, it could be very
> confusing having all your mail apps but 2 or 3 support this variable.

Hmm, elm-me+ utilities (and mailutils doesn't provide them all) use an
elaborate .elmrc, the equivalent variable being `incoming-mailbox',
with IMAP and POP support as well.  I think it would be even more
confusing for elm-me+ users, for the same reason, especially on a
multi-user system where they might not even be aware of mailutils
getting installed.

To use another package as an example: tcsh fixes many csh bugs, has
many additional features, and provides a full compatibility mode when
invoked as /bin/csh.  Nonetheless, the original csh has priority 30,
while tcsh has 20.

I believe in the principle of least surprise: historically, frm was
part of elm, and that's what users have come to expect.

> We haven't looked if the three mailutils-based apps support the elm
> features. Do you know off-hand? If it's just missing a few, I think the
> mailutils upstreams could consider adding them.

- elm-me+ frm has `-v' for verbose mode.
- elm-me+ frm turns on `-n' when invoked as `nfrm'.  Note that GNU
  Standards deprecate this.

- elm-me+ readmsg defaults to the current folder, the current message,
  and the screen numbering when invoked from within elm (e.g. in an
  external editor while composing a mail reply).  I doubt mailutils
  will ever implement this.
- mailutils readmsg has `-w WEEDLIST' for selecting displayed headers.

- elm-me+ messages is a simple shell script and works only with local
  Unix mailboxes.

> Mailutils is under active development right now.

elm-me+ isn't unmaintained either.

> While we decide what to do, I guess I should add diversions for these
> too, and switch to alternatives when we have a consensus. We need an
> upload soon as we got a bug filed for a serious bug.

I don't think it will take us more than a week to reach a conclusion,
so you needn't bother with more diversions (you'll have to remove them
later in the preinst).  BTW, what serious bug?

Thanks,

Matej

Processing of tkmail_4.0beta9-8.1_arm.changes

2002-10-08 Thread Archive Administrator 
tkmail_4.0beta9-8.1_arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  tkmail_4.0beta9-8.1_arm.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon

tkmail_4.0beta9-8.1_arm.changes REJECTED

2002-10-08 Thread Debian Installer 

Mapping stable-security to proposed-updates.
Rejected: tkmail_4.0beta9-8.1_arm.deb: old version (4.0beta9-8) in unstable <= 
new version (4.0beta9-8.1) targeted at proposed-updates.


===

If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.

Your rejected files are in incoming/REJECT/.  (Some may also be in
incoming/ if your .changes file was unparsable.)  If only some of the
files need to repaired, you may move any good files back to incoming/.
Please remove any bad files from incoming/REJECT/.

Bug#141183: elm-me+: Please use alternatives for /usr/bin/frm

2002-10-08 Thread Jordi Mallach 
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 11:25:24AM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
> Hmm, elm-me+ utilities (and mailutils doesn't provide them all) use an
> elaborate .elmrc, the equivalent variable being `incoming-mailbox',
> with IMAP and POP support as well.  I think it would be even more
> confusing for elm-me+ users, for the same reason, especially on a
> multi-user system where they might not even be aware of mailutils
> getting installed.

I see. Ok, let's see if Jeff has something else to say. If not, it's
fine with me to use the priorities that you proposed.

> - elm-me+ frm has `-v' for verbose mode.
> - elm-me+ frm turns on `-n' when invoked as `nfrm'.  Note that GNU
>   Standards deprecate this.
> 
> - elm-me+ readmsg defaults to the current folder, the current message,
>   and the screen numbering when invoked from within elm (e.g. in an
>   external editor while composing a mail reply).  I doubt mailutils
>   will ever implement this.
> - mailutils readmsg has `-w WEEDLIST' for selecting displayed headers.
> 
> - elm-me+ messages is a simple shell script and works only with local
>   Unix mailboxes.

Ok, thanks for having a look. It looks like the only one that would be
worth supporting as a mailutils default is messages, but I don't feel
it's a good idea to have frm and readmsg from elm+ and messages from
mailutils by default. All or none, I'd say, so none.

> > Mailutils is under active development right now.
> elm-me+ isn't unmaintained either.

Yeah, I know. I just meant that lacking features could be added by
mailutils authors, if they think they are useful.

> I don't think it will take us more than a week to reach a conclusion,
> so you needn't bother with more diversions (you'll have to remove them
> later in the preinst).  BTW, what serious bug?

Yeah. I'm not uploading it anyway. There's some build problems right
now.

The bug is in libmailutils-dev.

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/~jordi/


pgpytQ0U0dgRf.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#141183: elm-me+: Please use alternatives for /usr/bin/frm

2002-10-08 Thread Matej Vela 
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 05:35:07PM +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 11:25:24AM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
> > Hmm, elm-me+ utilities (and mailutils doesn't provide them all) use an
> > elaborate .elmrc, the equivalent variable being `incoming-mailbox',
> > with IMAP and POP support as well.  I think it would be even more
> > confusing for elm-me+ users, for the same reason, especially on a
> > multi-user system where they might not even be aware of mailutils
> > getting installed.
> 
> I see. Ok, let's see if Jeff has something else to say. If not, it's
> fine with me to use the priorities that you proposed.

Great.  If Jeff agrees, I'll do elm-me+ on Sunday.  Please add
`Conflicts: elm-me+ (<< 2.4pl25ME+99c-3)' to your next upload for
smooth upgrades; I'll add `Conflicts: mailutils (<= 20020904-2)',
right?

Thanks,

Matej

Bug#141183: elm-me+: Please use alternatives for /usr/bin/frm

2002-10-08 Thread Jordi Mallach 
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
> Great.  If Jeff agrees, I'll do elm-me+ on Sunday.  Please add
> `Conflicts: elm-me+ (<< 2.4pl25ME+99c-3)' to your next upload for
> smooth upgrades; I'll add `Conflicts: mailutils (<= 20020904-2)',
> right?

Ok. Note that I won't be able to work on a mailutils update till Sunday
night, after dinstall (I'm leaving for two trips tomorrow).

The Conflicts version for elm is correct.

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/~jordi/


pgpZRYBKpDNUy.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#116006: marked as done (wmppxp: does not build on ia64)

2002-10-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:27:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of wmppxp 0.51.0-2.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2001 18:44:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 17 13:44:29 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zealot.progeny.com (butthead.progeny.com) [216.37.46.162] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15tvg5-0003dm-00; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 13:44:29 -0500
Received: by butthead.progeny.com (Postfix, from userid 10001)
id 888DF6AB; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 13:44:28 -0500 (EST)
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: wmppxp: does not build on ia64
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.31
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.31
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 13:44:28 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: wmppxp
Version: 0.51.0-2
Severity: serious

I have prepped an NMU to solve this problem, which I will upload tomorrow.

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 13:14:09 -0500
Source: wmppxp
Binary: wmppxp
Architecture: source ia64
Version: 0.51.0-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 wmppxp - PPxP console for Window Maker dock
Changes: 
 wmppxp (0.51.0-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * NMU
   * debian/control:
 - added Build-Depends
 - bumped Standards-Version
 - cleaned up description a little, but it needs more help
   * debian/docs: don't ship upstream INSTALL document (lintian warning)
   * debian/rules:
 - install binary to /usr/bin (Policy 12.8.7)

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: ia64
Kernel: Linux butthead 2.4.9-itanium-smp #1 SMP Mon Sep 17 20:48:35 MDT 2001 
ia64
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


---
Received: (at 116006-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2002 21:28:22 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 08 16:28:22 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17z1tt-0005pT-00; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 16:28:21 -0500
Received: from jagor.srce.hr ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by jagor.srce.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g98LRMm2027769
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:27:22 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by jagor.srce.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) id g98LRLRf027768
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:27:21 +0200 (MEST)
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:27:21 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed in NMU of wmppxp 0.51.0-2.1
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter at jagor.srce.hr
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Now that wmppxp is orphaned, bugs fixed in non-maintainer uploads
can be closed.  The .changes file follows.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 09:31:43 -0500
Source: wmppxp
Binary: wmppxp
Architecture: source ia64
Version: 0.51.0-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 wmppxp - PPxP console for Window Maker dock
Closes: 116006
Changes: 
 wmppxp (0.51.0-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * NMU
   * debian/control:
 - added Build-Depends (Closes: #116006)
 - bumped Standards-Version
 - cleaned up description a little, but it needs more help
   * debian/docs: don't ship upstream INSTALL document (lintian warning)
   * debian/rules:
 - install binary to /usr/bin (Policy 12.8.7)
Files: 
 75597babf690cab0ef78e38b05b1c135 629 net optional wmppxp_0.51.0-2.1.dsc
 0fdcd9ac70bc2733a3ff67d8e7962c39 2483 net optional wmppxp_0.51.0-2.1.diff.gz
 3a103ee6f7576ecb1a9e4ac9b231f033 30316 net optional wmppxp_0.51.0-2.1_ia64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjvO6BwACgkQ6kxmHytGonxbQACdGIRVt4jg5o/TBoeesX7X1AUS
YIMAoJWtfym/Ds+Mo2G7gW32iMLEZlGX
=wN/q
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Bug#105925: marked as done (bug: important bugs are *not* release-critical)

2002-10-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:27:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of bug 3.3.10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jul 2001 20:42:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 19 15:42:14 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from navier.mit.edu [:::18.53.0.120] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15NKcg-000504-00; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 15:42:14 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mit.edu)
by navier.mit.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 15NKca-0006fQ-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 16:42:08 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 16:42:08 -0400
From: Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Massachvsetts Institvte of Technology
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.6-686-smp i686; en-US; rv:0.9.1) 
Gecko/20010620
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: bug: important bugs are *not* release-critical
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: bug
Version: 3.3.9
Severity: serious

Greetings,

Bug's severity option 2 wording very strongly implies 
release-criticality.  But it generates a bug of severity "important", 
which is not release-critical (see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer).

Please change the wording to reflect the severity, or else make bug 
generate serious bugs with this option.

Note that bug does not currently have options for serious or minor bugs.

Thanks,
-- 

-Adam P.

GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B  C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6

Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe! 




 
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux p4-117-2 2.4.6-686 #1 Thu Jul 5 21:37:12 EST 2001 
i686 unknown

Versions of the packages bug depends on:
ii  bash   2.05-4 The GNU Bourne Again SHell
ii  debianutils1.15   Miscellaneous utilities specific to 
Debian.
ii  file   3.33-5 Determines file type using "magic" numbers





---
Received: (at 105925-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2002 21:28:10 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 08 16:28:10 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17z1th-0005p8-00; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 16:28:10 -0500
Received: from jagor.srce.hr ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by jagor.srce.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g98LRAm2027742
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:27:11 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by jagor.srce.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) id g98LR9mv027741
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:27:09 +0200 (MEST)
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:27:09 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed in NMU of bug 3.3.10
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter at jagor.srce.hr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by jagor.srce.hr id 
g98LRAm2027742
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Now that bug is orphaned, bugs fixed in non-maintainer uploads
can be closed.  The .changes file follows.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  4 Aug 2001 12:37:36 +0300
Source: bug
Binary: bug
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.3.10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Nicol=E1s Lichtmaier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Moshe Zadka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:=20
 bug- Bug Reporting Tool interfacing with the Bug Tracking System
Closes: 105925
Changes:=20
 bug (3.3.10) unstable; urgency=3Dlow
 .
   * Fixed description of important bugs (copied from web site) (closes: =
#105925)
Files:=20
 6bc88e7843ce11e62b5a4c34168e6162 521 utils optional bug_3.3.10.dsc

Bug#117352: marked as done (nase-a60_0.20a-1(mipsel/unstable): out of date build-depends checker)

2002-10-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:27:39 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of nase-a60 0.20a-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Oct 2001 07:31:46 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 28 01:31:46 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from h24-76-98-250.vc.shawcable.net (straylight.cyberhqz.com) 
[24.76.98.250] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15xkQ5-0006Cb-00; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 01:31:46 -0600
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by straylight.cyberhqz.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id AAA28310
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 00:31:45 -0700
From: Ryan Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 00:31:44 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: nase-a60_0.20a-1(mipsel/unstable): out of date build-depends checker
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: nase-a60
Version: 0.20a-1
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of nase-a60_0.20a-1 on remake.rfc822.org by sbuild/mipsel 
> 1.159
> Build started at 20011014-2121

[...]

> rm -f main.o util.o tree.o symtab.o type.o stmt.o check.o expr.o err.o run.o 
> eval.o bltin.o doeval.o mkc.o a60-scan.o a60-ptab.o  gmon.out *.output *.TMP 
> extrerrm \
> extrerrm.c *~
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/nase-a60-0.20a'
> rm -rf debian/tmp debian/*~ debian/files debian/substvars build *~
> rm -rf source-depends
> rm -rf a60 xa60 a60.html
>  debian/rules build
> test -f a60-ptab.h -a -f debian/rules
> chmod u+x debian/check-sourcedeps
> debian/check-sourcedeps xlib6g-dev texinfo
> Checking source dependencies: 
>  xlib6g-dev... FAILED,
>  texinfo... OK,
> Done.
> make: *** [source-depends] Error 1

A full build log can be found at:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=mipsel&pkg=nase-a60&ver=0.20a-1

nase-a60 tries to look for xlib6g-dev, when it should probably be looking
for xlibs-dev (or really, use build-depends instead).

---
Received: (at 117352-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2002 21:28:41 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 08 16:28:41 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17z1uC-0005qZ-00; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 16:28:40 -0500
Received: from jagor.srce.hr ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by jagor.srce.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g98LRfm2027796
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:27:41 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by jagor.srce.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) id g98LRdJS027795
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:27:39 +0200 (MEST)
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:27:39 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed in NMU of nase-a60 0.20a-1.1
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter at jagor.srce.hr
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Now that nase-a60 is orphaned, bugs fixed in non-maintainer uploads
can be closed.  The .changes file follows.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun,  6 Jan 2002 23:50:06 -0700
Source: nase-a60
Binary: nase-a60
Architecture: source hppa
Version: 0.20a-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 nase-a60   - An Algol-60 interpreter
Closes: 117352
Changes: 
 nase-a60 (0.20a-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * NMU
   * Fix Build-Depends.  Closes: #117352
Files: 
 deca47cf3a571337bad871faaa1bb180 11202 interpreters optional 
nase-a60_0.20a-1.1.diff.gz
 decb96f7967439111891086e8b11be9c 631 interpreters optional 
nase-a60_0.20a-1.1.dsc
 7708105fd8049908b0d029fbe40dee06 175336 interpreters extra 
nase-a60_0.20a-1.1_hppa.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8OVKp9qtJ0yRhi/YRAkiXAJ9xgXm3XbODN8Tyfc49pjk1IClWFwCfYqYj
wLn3qAljiQ9SYjF3Oqkiu6M=
=7cdw
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Bug#128143: marked as done (xftp: depends on xaw-wrappers that no longer exists)

2002-10-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:27:47 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of moxftp 2.2-17.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jan 2002 17:41:25 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 07 11:41:25 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bacchus.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.21] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16Ndm1-0001kp-00; Mon, 07 Jan 2002 11:41:25 -0600
Received: from irancy.lis.inpg.fr ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [195.220.21.167])
by bacchus.lis.inpg.fr (8.12.1/8.12.1/cf de Bacchus - 13/12/2001) with 
ESMTP id g07HWbsu009426;
Mon, 7 Jan 2002 18:32:37 +0100
Received: from bonnaud by irancy.lis.inpg.fr with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id 16Ndly-00050H-00; Mon, 07 Jan 2002 18:41:22 +0100
From: laurent bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xftp: depends on xaw-wrappers that no longer exists
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.41.14213
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.41.14213
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 18:41:22 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: laurent bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.2 (www dot roaringpenguin dot com slash mimedefang)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: xftp
Version: 2.2-17
Severity: serious


Hi,

xaw-wrappers has been removed from sid.  Therefore xftp cannot be installed any
longer.


-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux irancy 2.4.16-k7 #1 Wed Nov 28 11:06:52 EST 2001 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Versions of packages xftp depends on:
ii  libc6 2.2.4-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libxaw7   4.1.0-11   X Athena widget set library
pi  xaw-wrappers  1.12   allow use of programs with xaw rep
ii  xlibs 4.1.0-11   X Window System client libraries


---
Received: (at 128143-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2002 21:28:48 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 08 16:28:48 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17z1uK-0005ql-00; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 16:28:48 -0500
Received: from jagor.srce.hr ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by jagor.srce.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g98LRnm2027809
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:27:49 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by jagor.srce.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) id g98LRlCN027808
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:27:47 +0200 (MEST)
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:27:47 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed in NMU of moxftp 2.2-17.2
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter at jagor.srce.hr
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Now that moxftp is orphaned, bugs fixed in non-maintainer uploads
can be closed.  The .changes file follows.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri,  8 Feb 2002 13:57:05 +
Source: moxftp
Binary: xftp
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.2-17.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Daniel Glassey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 xftp   - Athena X interface to ftp.
Closes: 128143
Changes: 
 moxftp (2.2-17.2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * remember to have proper orig.tar.gz around, Closes: #128143
Files: 
 9d27ad98e0a5b6da8ba14777a8becdd5 603 net optional moxftp_2.2-17.2.dsc
 e4ab520195ce889e882371ffe182a0d8 33840 net optional moxftp_2.2-17.2.diff.gz
 a4a5ff83a6509581a3f7ed83a9730b89 164524 net optional xftp_2.2-17.2_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8Y9pU/offrSwPzRoRArvnAKCMFKTDEpUMpaNv+JMCdfNqOukQvgCfVEpU
UMFANJz8bFkstRjxHfPI3mg=
=1fBi
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Bug#81599: marked as done (bug: typo in manpage)

2002-10-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:28:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of bug 3.3.10.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jan 2001 17:27:36 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 08 11:27:35 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pec-145-176.tnt10.s2.uunet.de (lithium) [149.225.145.176] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14Fg51-0005PT-00; Mon, 08 Jan 2001 11:27:35 -0600
Received: by lithium (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id D5E7D8F9B; Mon,  8 Jan 2001 18:27:36 +0100 (CET)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bug: typo in manpage
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.10
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon,  8 Jan 2001 18:27:36 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: bug
Version: 3.2.10
Severity: normal

Hello,
in the DESCRIPTION of the manpage it says in paragraph 5:
   Since  bug could include sensitive system information in a
   bug report when run as a system user  it  will  not  allow
   being run as one of them (inclusing root). If running from
 ^
it should probably be "including" :-)

thanks, Jonathan
 

-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Kernel Version: Linux lithium 2.2.15 #1 Sat Nov 4 13:20:08 CET 2000 i686 unknown

Versions of the packages bug depends on:
ii  bash   2.03-6 The GNU Bourne Again SHell
ii  debianutils1.13.3 Miscellaneous utilities specific to Debian.
ii  file   3.28-1 Determines file type using "magic" numbers

---
Received: (at 81599-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2002 21:29:13 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 08 16:29:13 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17z1uj-0005ru-00; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 16:29:13 -0500
Received: from jagor.srce.hr ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by jagor.srce.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g98LSEm2027859
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:28:14 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by jagor.srce.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) id g98LSCvu027858
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:28:12 +0200 (MEST)
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:28:12 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed in NMU of bug 3.3.10.1
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter at jagor.srce.hr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by jagor.srce.hr id 
g98LSEm2027859
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Now that bug is orphaned, bugs fixed in non-maintainer uploads
can be closed.  The .changes file follows.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 21:16:00 +0100
Source: bug
Binary: bug
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.3.10.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Nicol=E1s Lichtmaier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Noel Koethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:=20
 bug- Bug Reporting Tool interfacing with the Bug Tracking System
Closes: 81599 87698 124469 134477
Changes:=20
 bug (3.3.10.1) unstable; urgency=3Dlow
 .
   * NMU
   * corrected build depends
 (closes: Bug#134477)
   * manpage already corrected
 (closes: Bug#81599)
   * corrected spelling errors in description
 (closes: Bug#124469)
   * added french po translation file
 (closes: Bug#87698)
Files:=20
 9267aff2cb982b9484965fd0bf785b27 539 utils optional bug_3.3.10.1.dsc
 dd3c44f47ff4b8bc7a2da1eb5aea5350 27990 utils optional bug_3.3.10.1.tar.g=
z
 8496a684d29ed5ecfa305a1b5cd11ac1 27534 utils optional bug_3.3.10.1_all.d=
eb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8crhe9/DnDzB9Vu0RApPNAJ9NuKuj8wo17QQo/sCrReMZEyIfnACeJ9nF
YZciqMrq9+vb6tbgZAznGiE=3D
=3Ddrqv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Bug#124469: marked as done (bug: Spelling error in description)

2002-10-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:28:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of bug 3.3.10.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2001 22:03:07 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 17 16:03:07 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16G5ql-0002Q8-00; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 16:03:07 -0600
Received: from 146-115-121-200.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com 
([146.115.121.200] helo=mizar.alcor.net)
by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #10)
id 16G5ql-0002Pv-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 17:03:07 -0500
Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id 16G5ql-7u-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 17:03:07 -0500
From: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bug: Spelling error in description
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 17:03:07 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: bug
Severity: minor

This is an automated bug report.

I have recently conducted a mass spelling check of Debian package
descriptions.  In the process, some other errors were also detected,
such as capitalization, word wrap, and indentation problems.

Some notable guidelines that I used in the check include:

- Capitalization

  The names of languages (English, French, etc.) are capitalized in
  English.  Acronyms should be in all capital letters.

- Abbreviation

  In general, words should not be abbreviated as part of the
  description.  Exceptions include standard abbreviations like "etc.".
  This is especially important for proper keyword searches.

- Word joining

  For various reasons, technical terms tend to be artificially joined
  to form new words, like "bugreport".  While this may be acceptable
  in an informal context, such words should be written separately in
  package descriptions, for clarity and to aid in searching.

In some cases where there the spelling check uncovered other errors, I
have made other edits in the diff for purposes of grammar and clarity.

There appear to be one or more errors in the description for this
package.  A unified diff follows at the end of this message.  You
should be able to apply it to your source tree by piping this message
directly into a command line like:

patch /home/me/somewhere/mypackage/debian/control

There is a chance that this may not work if your control has been
modified from the version of your source package in the Debian
archive.  If so, you will have to apply the diff by hand.  When doing
so, please take note if there are multiple corrections on the same
line of the diff.

If you believe this correction to be in error, please contact me
before closing this bug so that we can come to an understanding, and
so that provisions can be made for future spelling checks.

If you are not a native English speaker and would like assistance
improving your description, contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--- orig/bugMon Dec 17 15:52:27 2001
+++ corrected/bug   Mon Dec 17 15:59:03 2001
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 Package: bug
 Description: Bug Reporting Tool interfacing with the Bug Tracking System
  A script to ease the reporting of bugs. Automatically figures out version
- numbers of the package reported and all depending packages. Adds configfiles
- etc to the bugreport.
+ numbers of the package reported and all depending packages. Adds config files
+ etc to the bug report.
  .
  A script for easily accessing the bug database in the WWW is also included.
 

---
Received: (at 124469-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2002 21:29:21 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 08 16:29:21 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17z1uq-0005sE-00; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 16:29:20 -0500
Received: from jagor.srce.hr ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by jagor.srce.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g98LSLm2027873
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:28:21 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by jagor.srce.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) id g98LSK0r027872
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:28:20 +0200 (MEST)

Bug#134477: marked as done (FTBFS: Build failure of bug on i386)

2002-10-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:28:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of bug 3.3.10.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Feb 2002 21:24:43 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 17 15:24:43 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mikilab.doshisha.ac.jp [202.23.156.50] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16cYna-0003tr-00; Sun, 17 Feb 2002 15:24:42 -0600
Received: from atoron (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mikilab.doshisha.ac.jp (8.9.3/3.7W) with SMTP id GAA16029
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 06:24:10 +0900
X-Authentication-Warning: mikilab.doshisha.ac.jp: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] 
claimed to be atoron
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 06:25:32 +0900
From: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: submit bug tracking system <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FTBFS: Build failure of bug on i386
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Netfort project
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.6.5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: bug
Version: 3.3.10
Severity: serious
Tags: patch


bug fails to build from source on i386, when doing a binary-all build.


Build log follows:
===

Setting up gettext (0.10.40-3) ...
emacsen-common: Handling install of emacsen flavor emacs

Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
Sorry, fakeroot is already the newest version.
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0  not upgraded.
Copying back the cached apt archive contents
 -> Building the package
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is bug
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 3.3.10
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is i386
 debian/rules clean
dh_testdir
make: dh_testdir: Command not found
make: *** [clean] Error 127
===

The following patch should fix the build failure
==
diff -ru bug-3.3.10-orig/debian/control bug-3.3.10/debian/control
--- bug-3.3.10-orig/debian/control  Sat Jan  6 12:59:52 2001
+++ bug-3.3.10/debian/control   Mon Feb 18 05:48:46 2002
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Source: bug
-Build-Depends: gettext
+Build-Depends: gettext, debhelper
 Section: utils
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Nicol$Bas(B Lichtmaier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
==



regards,
   junichi



-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer




---
Received: (at 134477-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2002 21:29:06 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 08 16:29:06 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17z1ub-0005rK-00; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 16:29:05 -0500
Received: from jagor.srce.hr ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by jagor.srce.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g98LS6m2027840
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:28:06 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by jagor.srce.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) id g98LS5nJ027839
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:28:05 +0200 (MEST)
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:28:05 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed in NMU of bug 3.3.10.1
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter at jagor.srce.hr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by jagor.srce.hr id 
g98LS6m2027840
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Now that bug is orphaned, bugs fixed in non-maintainer uploads
can be closed.  The .changes file follows.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 21:16:00 +0100
Source: bug
Binary: bug
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.3.10.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Nicol=E1s Lichtmaier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Noel Koethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:=20
 bug- Bug Reporting Tool interfacing with the Bug Tracking System
Closes: 81599 87698 124469 134477
Changes:=20
 bug (3.3.10.1) unstable; urgency=3Dlow
 .
   * NMU
   * corrected build depends

Bug#87698: marked as done (bug: [patch] new french po file)

2002-10-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:28:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of bug 3.3.10.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Feb 2001 09:27:43 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 26 03:27:43 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pixies.ens-lyon.fr [:::140.77.13.230] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14XJwV-00046K-00; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 03:27:43 -0600
Received: from mquinson by pixies.ens-lyon.fr with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 14XJwT-l2-00; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:27:41 +0100
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:27:41 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bug: [patch] new french po file
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="KsGdsel6WgEHnImy"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
From: Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--KsGdsel6WgEHnImy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: bug
Version: 3.3.9
Severity: wishlist

Hello, 

here is a completed and revised po file for the bug package in french.
(done by Laurent Cooper)

Thanks for adding it to the package.

Bye, Mt.

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux pixies 2.2.17-ide #1 Sat Sep 9 14:03:23 EST 2000 i686
unknown

Versions of the packages bug depends on:
ii  bash   2.04-9 The GNU Bourne Again SHell
ii  debianutils1.15   Miscellaneous utilities specific to Debian.
ii  file   3.33-4 Determines file type using "magic" numbers

--KsGdsel6WgEHnImy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="bug.fr.po"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

# PO file for the bug program.
#
# Copyright (C) 2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
# FIRST AUTHOR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, YEAR.
#
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: bug\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2001-02-22 11:38+01:00\n"
"Last-Translator: Laurent COOPER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n"
"Language-Team: Debian French Translators\n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Latin-1\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bits\n"

#: bug:374
msgid "$0: Cannot locate a text editor."
msgstr "$0: Impossible de trouver un éditeur de texte."

#: bug:116
msgid "$0: could not create temp file!"
msgstr "$0: Impossible de créer un fichier temporaire."

#: bug:284
msgid "$0: File \\`$FILE' can't be found in any installed package."
msgstr "$0: Je ne trouve le fichier \\`$FILE'  dans aucun paquet installé."

#: bug:263
msgid "$0: File \\`$FILE' not found."
msgstr "$0: Le fichier \\`$FILE' est introuvable."

#: bug:519
msgid "$0 interrupted."
msgstr "$0 interrompu."

#: bug:335
msgid "$0: Invalid package name."
msgstr "$0: Nom de paquet invalide."

#: bug:278
msgid "$0: Must include parameter when using -f."
msgstr "$0: Vous devez inclure un paramètre avec l'option -f."

#: bug:238
msgid "$0: Must specify file name when using -f."
msgstr "$0: Vous devez spécifier un nom de fichier avec l'option -f"

#: bug:327
msgid "$0: Package name goes first, bug report last."
msgstr "$0: Nom de paquet en premier, et le rapport de bogue en dernier."

#: bug:331
msgid "$0: Packages names are formed with lower case letters."
msgstr "$0: Les noms des paquets sont en minuscules."

#: bug:22
msgid "$0: Please set the environment variable EMAIL to contain your fully 
qualified e-mail address and try again."
msgstr "$0: Veuillez affecter à la variable EMAIL votre adresse courriel 
pleinement qualifiée et essayez de nouveau."

#: bug:232
msgid "$0: Wrong number of arguments"
msgstr "$0: Nombre d'arguments incorrect."

#: bug:737
msgid "Bug report canceled (report text left in $SAVEFILE)."
msgstr "Rapport de bogue annulé (le texte du rapport est laissé dans 
$SAVEFILE)."

#: bug:645
msgid "Bug report not sent"
msgstr "Rapport de bogue non envoyé."

#: bug:799
msgid "Bug report saved in $SAVEFILE"
msgstr "Rapport de bogue sauvegardé dans $SAVEFILE"

#: bug:806
msgid "Bug Report submitted to $MADDR $CC"
msgstr "Rapport de bogue soumis à $MADDR $CC ."

#: bug:317
msgid "Cancelled!"
msgstr "Annulé !"

#: bug:541
msgid "Checking ${PACKAGE}'s dependencies..."
msgstr "Vérification des dépendances du paquet ${PACKAGE} ..."

#: bug:289 bug:534 bug:577 bug:586 bug:629
msgid

Bug#93081: marked as done (langdrill crashes on startup)

2002-10-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:39:00 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of langdrill 0.2.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Apr 2001 07:05:54 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 06 02:05:54 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from x8b4e531b.dhcp.okstate.edu (dvdeug) [139.78.83.27] (foobar)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14lQJe-00089S-00; Fri, 06 Apr 2001 02:05:54 -0500
Received: from dvdeug by dvdeug with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 14lQHy-0001jj-00; Fri, 06 Apr 2001 02:04:10 -0500
From: David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: langdrill crashes on startup
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.14
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.14
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2001 02:04:09 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: langdrill
Version: 0.2.1-3
Severity: important

~ $ langdrill
langdrill: Symbol `__ti13VDKCustomList' has different size in shared object, 
consider re-linking
langdrill: Symbol `__ti8VDKFrame' has different size in shared object, consider 
re-linking
langdrill: Symbol `__ti6VDKBox' has different size in shared object, consider 
re-linking
langdrill: Symbol `__ti18VDKObjectContainer' has different size in shared 
object, consider re-linking
langdrill: Symbol `__ti9VDKObject' has different size in shared object, 
consider re-linking
langdrill: Symbol `__ti7VDKForm' has different size in shared object, consider 
re-linking
langdrill: Symbol `__ti17VDKAbstractButton' has different size in shared 
object, consider re-linking

Gdk-WARNING **: locale not supported by Xlib, locale set to C
Application rc: /etc/langdrill.rc.
langdrill: error while loading shared libraries: langdrill: undefined symbol: 
__7VDKFormP14VDKApplicationPci13GtkWindowType
~ $ 

I suppose it's some C++ library mixup. 

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux dvdeug 2.4.0 #9 Thu Feb 22 01:11:46 CST 2001 i686

Versions of packages langdrill depends on:
ii  libc62.2.2-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libglib1.2   1.2.10-1The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk1.21.2.10-1The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii  libstdc++2.101:2.95.2-14 The GNU stdc++ library
ii  libvdk1  1.2.5-3 The Visual Development Kit C++ lib
ii  xlib6g   4.0.2-13pseudopackage providing X librarie


---
Received: (at 93081-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2002 21:40:01 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 08 16:40:01 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17z25B-0007UW-00; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 16:40:01 -0500
Received: from jagor.srce.hr ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by jagor.srce.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g98Ld2m2029088
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:39:02 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by jagor.srce.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) id g98Ld0PF029082
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:39:00 +0200 (MEST)
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:39:00 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed in NMU of langdrill 0.2.1-4
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter at jagor.srce.hr
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Now that langdrill is orphaned, bugs fixed in non-maintainer uploads
can be closed.  Here is the relevant changelog entry:

  langdrill (0.2.1-4) unstable; urgency=low

* NMU
* Simple recompile to fix bug #93081
* Minor lintian fixes

   -- David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Fri, 24 Aug 2001 21:05:00 -0500