THEEXTRAS.COM

2002-10-02 Thread TheExtras.com 
Dear Sir/madam, 
 
THEEXTRAS.COM - US$610 
 
Please note that after years, the registration on the domain name 
THEEXTRAS.COM was not renewed and this domain had become available to register. 
 
Consequently, we have been approached to market this domain name that has been 
tracked and registered by a client. As a result, THEEXTRAS.COM is now available 
from us for IMMEDIATE transfer. 
 
This is a VALUABLE and HIGH PROFILE domain and we believe that this 
development could be of genuine interest and benefit to your operation. Please 
note that the domain name market is extremely solid at the moment and similar 
domains are currently selling on afternic.com, greatdomains.com (domain auction 
sites) and by domain 
name brokers, in some cases, for many thousands of US dollars. 
 
Please note that transfers take just 15 minutes and are extremely 
straightforward - absolutely NO technical knowledge required! 
 
For our client's peace of mind, we use an escrow service for all 
transactions and domains are ALWAYS secured by the buyer prior to us 
receiving any funds. We pay all fees connected with the escrow process.  
 
If you would like to use WWW.THEEXTRAS.COM for your online business, please 
contact us at your earliest convenience. We will be on hand should you require 
any further assistance or information. 
 
We thank you for your attention and sincerely apologise if this e-mail 
has not been of interest to you. 
 
Yours sincerely, 
 
Caroline 
Marketing 
The Portal

emacs-dl-canna_1.4-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2002-10-02 Thread Debian Installer 

Accepted:
emacs-dl-canna_1.4-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/emacs-dl-canna/emacs-dl-canna_1.4-5.diff.gz
emacs-dl-canna_1.4-5.dsc
  to pool/main/e/emacs-dl-canna/emacs-dl-canna_1.4-5.dsc
emacs-dl-canna_1.4-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/emacs-dl-canna/emacs-dl-canna_1.4-5_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 140900 141204 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

birthday_1.5-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2002-10-02 Thread Debian Installer 

Accepted:
birthday_1.5-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/b/birthday/birthday_1.5-5.diff.gz
birthday_1.5-5.dsc
  to pool/main/b/birthday/birthday_1.5-5.dsc
birthday_1.5-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/b/birthday/birthday_1.5-5_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 160019 160020 161314 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Bug#140900: marked as done (can not input Japanese on subject line of mew draft mode)

2002-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Wed, 02 Oct 2002 09:06:45 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#140900: fixed in emacs-dl-canna 1.4-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2002 09:44:07 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 02 03:44:07 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mizuho.linux.or.jp (lists.linux.or.jp) [210.171.226.47] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16sKpj-98-00; Tue, 02 Apr 2002 03:44:07 -0600
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by lists.linux.or.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E32D5FD58
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue,  2 Apr 2002 18:44:00 +0900 (JST)
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 18:43:57 +0900
From: ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: can not input Japanese on subject line of mew draft mode
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.8 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Dispatcher: imput version 2414(IM141)
Lines: 126
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: emacs-dl-canna
Version: 1.4-4
Tags: patch

 `japanese-canna' input mode can not input Japanese at subject line in
mew (2.0 or later) draft mode.  This is canna.el's bug.

 Here is a patch to fix this, please apply it.

--- emacs-dl-canna-1.4/canna.el.origTue Apr  2 18:11:23 2002
+++ emacs-dl-canna-1.4/canna.el Tue Apr  2 18:17:30 2002
@@ -224,6 +224,7 @@
 
 (defvar canna:*exit-japanese-mode* nil)
 (defvar canna:*fence-mode* nil)
+(defvar canna:*select-mode* nil)
 ;(make-variable-buffer-local 'canna:*fence-mode*)
 ;(setq-default canna:*fence-mode* nil)
 
@@ -237,11 +238,9 @@
 (defvar canna:*spos-undo-text* (make-marker))
 (defvar canna:*epos-undo-text* (make-marker))
 (defvar canna:*undo-text-yomi* nil)
-(defvar canna:*local-map-backup*  nil)
 (defvar canna:*last-kouho* 0)
 (defvar canna:*initialized* nil)
 (defvar canna:*previous-window* nil)
-(defvar canna:*minibuffer-local-map-backup* nil)
 (defvar canna:*cursor-was-in-minibuffer* nil)
 (defvar canna:*menu-buffer* " *menu*")
 (defvar canna:*saved-minibuffer*)
@@ -322,6 +321,11 @@
(define-key canna-mode-map [?\C- ]   [EMAIL PROTECTED])
))
 
+(or (assq 'canna:*fence-mode* minor-mode-map-alist)
+(setq minor-mode-map-alist
+  (cons (cons 'canna:*fence-mode* canna-mode-map)
+   minor-mode-map-alist)))
+
 ;; ミニバッファに何かを表示している時のローカルマップ
 (defvar canna-minibuffer-mode-map (make-sparse-keymap))
 
@@ -363,6 +367,11 @@
(define-key canna-minibuffer-mode-map [?\C- ]   [EMAIL PROTECTED])
))
 
+(or (assq 'canna:*select-mode* minor-mode-map-alist)
+(setq minor-mode-map-alist
+  (cons (cons 'canna:*select-mode* canna-minibuffer-mode-map)
+   minor-mode-map-alist)))
+
 ;;;
 ;;; グローバル関数の書き替え
 ;;;
@@ -613,7 +622,7 @@
 (select-window (minibuffer-window))
 (set-window-buffer (minibuffer-window)
(get-buffer-create canna:*menu-buffer*))
-(use-local-map canna-minibuffer-mode-map) ))
+(setq canna:*select-mode* t)))
   )
 
 (defun canna:minibuffer-input (str len revpos revlen nfixed)
@@ -645,14 +654,12 @@
  (redirect-frame-focus (selected-frame) 
(window-frame (minibuffer-window)))
  )
-   ;; ミニバッファのキーマップを保存しておく。
-   (setq canna:*minibuffer-local-map-backup* (current-local-map))
))
   (select-window (minibuffer-window))
   (set-window-buffer (minibuffer-window)
 (get-buffer-create canna:*menu-buffer*))
 
-  (use-local-map canna-minibuffer-mode-map)
+  (setq canna:*select-mode* t)
 
 ;  (canna:yomi-attr-off (point-min) (point-max) )
 ;  (canna:henkan-attr-off (point-min) (point-max) )
@@ -679,7 +686,7 @@
   (if (or (zerop len) canna-empty-info)
   (progn
(setq canna:*cursor-was-in-minibuffer* nil)
-   (use-local-map canna:*minibuffer-local-map-backup*)
+   (setq canna:*select-mode* nil)
 
;; ミニバッファウィンドウのバッファを元に戻す。
(set-window-buffer (minibuffer-window) canna:*saved-minibuffer*)
@@ -707,7 +714,7 @@
   "Use input character as a key of complex

Bug#141204: marked as done (Can't install properly due to 'dpkg --print-architecture')

2002-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Wed, 02 Oct 2002 09:06:45 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#141204: fixed in emacs-dl-canna 1.4-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Apr 2002 20:17:27 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 04 14:17:27 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from libra1.rccp.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.109.69] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16tDfi-000757-00; Thu, 04 Apr 2002 14:17:27 -0600
Received: from localhost.localdomain.rccp.tsukuba.ac.jp (libra1 [127.0.0.1])
by libra1.rccp.tsukuba.ac.jp (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g34KHM030128
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 05:17:23 +0900
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 05:17:22 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Shin-ichi Tominaga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Can't install properly due to 'dpkg --print-architecture'
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.8.1 (Something) Emacs/20.7 Mule/4.0 (HANANOEN)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: emacs-dl-canna
Version: 1.4-4

When I installed this package using apt-get, it said

# apt-get install emacs-dl-canna
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  apel libcanna1g make 
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  apel emacs-dl-canna libcanna1g make 
0 packages upgraded, 4 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0  not upgraded.
Need to get 968kB of archives. After unpacking 2785kB will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] 
Get:1 ftp://ftp.jp.debian.org testing/main make 3.79.1-13 [386kB]
Get:2 ftp://ftp.jp.debian.org testing/main apel 10.3+cvs.2001.12.05-5 [129kB]
Get:3 ftp://ftp.jp.debian.org testing/main libcanna1g 3.5b2-44 [425kB]
Get:4 ftp://ftp.jp.debian.org testing/main emacs-dl-canna 1.4-4 [27.9kB]   
Fetched 968kB in 9s (100kB/s)  
Preconfiguring packages ...
Selecting previously deselected package make.
(Reading database ... 10017 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking make (from .../make_3.79.1-13_i386.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package apel.
Unpacking apel (from .../apel_10.3+cvs.2001.12.05-5_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libcanna1g.
Unpacking libcanna1g (from .../libcanna1g_3.5b2-44_i386.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package emacs-dl-canna.
Unpacking emacs-dl-canna (from .../emacs-dl-canna_1.4-4_i386.deb) ...
Setting up make (3.79.1-13) ...

Setting up apel (10.3+cvs.2001.12.05-5) ...
install/apel: Byte-compiling for emacs20 ... done.

Setting up libcanna1g (3.5b2-44) ...

Setting up emacs-dl-canna (1.4-4) ...
dpkg: warning, architecture `i386-none' not in remapping table
install/apel: Byte-compiling for emacs20 ... exited. (already compiled)
dpkg: warning, architecture `i386-none' not in remapping table
install/dl-canna: Byte-compiling for emacs20 
.../usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/emacs-dl-canna: cd: 
/usr/lib/emacs/20.7/i386-none-debian-linux-gnu: No such file or directory
 done.

I think this warning message is comming from the script
/usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/emacs-dl-canna.
In this script, there is a definition using "dpkg -print-architecture".
I execute this command in my machine,

$ dpkg --print-architecture
dpkg: warning, architecture `i386-none' not in remapping table
i386-none

I guess this is the source of error.

I try to overcome this problem, and find that installing gcc package is
clear this problem.

# apt-get install gcc-2.95  
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  binutils gcc 
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  binutils gcc gcc-2.95 
0 packages upgraded, 3 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0  not upgraded.
...

After that, dpkg returns right answer like

$ dpkg --print-architecture
i386

and I can install emacs-dl-canna package properly.

# apt-get install emacs-dl-canna
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  emacs-dl-canna 
0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0  not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/27.9kB of archives. After unpacking 180kB will be used.
Selecting previously deselected package emacs-dl-canna.
(Reading database ... 10347 files and di

larswm_7.2.6-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2002-10-02 Thread Debian Installer 

Accepted:
larswm_7.2.6-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/larswm/larswm_7.2.6-1.diff.gz
larswm_7.2.6-1.dsc
  to pool/main/l/larswm/larswm_7.2.6-1.dsc
larswm_7.2.6-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/l/larswm/larswm_7.2.6-1_i386.deb
larswm_7.2.6.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/larswm/larswm_7.2.6.orig.tar.gz
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

tkmail_4.0beta9-9_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2002-10-02 Thread Debian Installer 

Accepted:
tkmail_4.0beta9-9.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/tkmail/tkmail_4.0beta9-9.diff.gz
tkmail_4.0beta9-9.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tkmail/tkmail_4.0beta9-9.dsc
tkmail_4.0beta9-9_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/tkmail/tkmail_4.0beta9-9_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 158924 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Bug#158924: marked as done (tkmail: generic program name conflicts)

2002-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Wed, 02 Oct 2002 09:16:07 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#158924: fixed in tkmail 4.0beta9-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Aug 2002 21:20:01 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 30 16:20:01 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail13.speakeasy.net (mail.speakeasy.net) [216.254.0.213] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17ktBO-0001T0-00; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 16:19:58 -0500
Received: (qmail 3906 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2002 21:19:56 -
Received: from unknown (HELO kronstadt.homeunix.net) ([64.81.49.223]) 
(envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
  by mail13.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted 
SMTP
  for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 30 Aug 2002 21:19:56 -
Received: from itz by kronstadt.homeunix.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17ktBL-0002kJ-00; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 14:19:55 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ian Zimmerman)
Subject: tkmail: generic program name conflicts
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.7
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 14:19:55 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: tkmail
Version: 4.0beta9-8
Severity: normal

tkmail ships the file /usr/bin/dotlock.  This happens to be the name of
a Debian alternative that the maildrop package sets up when it is
installed.  Thus, tkmail's dotlock gets silently replaced by the alternative
link.

Unix mail delivery being what it is, this was bound to happen. tkmail really
should rename the program to something like dotlock.tkmail (and ideally,
also provide another choice for the dotlock alternative).

-- System Information
Debian Release: woody
Kernel Version: Linux kronstadt 2.4.19 #1 Thu Aug 22 08:52:25 PDT 2002 i586 
unknown

Versions of the packages tkmail depends on:
ii  libc6  2.2.5-11.1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii  tcl8.3 8.3.3-6The Tool Command Language (TCL) v8.3 - Run-T
ii  tk8.3  8.3.3-8The Tk toolkit for TCL and X11 v8.3 - Run-Ti
ii  xlibs  4.1.0-16   X Window System client libraries

-- 
Ian Zimmerman, Oakland, California, U.S.A.
GPG: 433BA087  9C0F 194F 203A 63F7 B1B8  6E5A 8CA3 27DB 433B A087
EngSoc adopts market economy: cheap is wasteful, efficient is expensive.

---
Received: (at 158924-close) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Oct 2002 13:35:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 02 08:35:09 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17wjef-0001vw-00; Wed, 02 Oct 2002 08:35:09 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 17wjMF-0002q1-00; Wed, 02 Oct 2002 09:16:07 -0400
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.26 $
Subject: Bug#158924: fixed in tkmail 4.0beta9-9
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 09:16:07 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tkmail, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

tkmail_4.0beta9-9.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/tkmail/tkmail_4.0beta9-9.diff.gz
tkmail_4.0beta9-9.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tkmail/tkmail_4.0beta9-9.dsc
tkmail_4.0beta9-9_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/tkmail/tkmail_4.0beta9-9_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated tkmail package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue,  1 Oct 2002 22:45:48 +0200
Source: tkmail
Binary: tkmail
Architecture: source i386
Version: 4.0beta9-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 tkmail - X Window System mail reader using Tcl/Tk
Close

Bug#141183: elm-me+: Please use alternatives for /usr/bin/frm

2002-10-02 Thread Matej Vela 
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 11:37:54AM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 12:01:43PM -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> > Package: elm-me+
> > Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-04
> > Severity: wishlist
> > 
> > Please consider using an alternative for frm.  Bug #139762, and
> > #116374 are requests for mailutils to divert this file, but I'd rather
> > use alternatives if you agree.
> 
> Sure (sorry about the delay -- the package is orphaned).  We'll also need
> to use alternatives for /usr/bin/messages and /usr/bin/readmsg.  Since
> elm-me+ is the original implementation, and more popular according to
> , how about priority 30 for
> elm-me+ and 20 for mailutils?

Well, how about it?  Status quo is no good:

  # dpkg -i mailutils_20020904-2_i386.deb
  Selecting previously deselected package mailutils.
  (Reading database ... 41952 files and directories currently installed.)
  Unpacking mailutils (from mailutils_20020904-2_i386.deb) ...
  Adding `diversion of /usr/bin/frm to /usr/bin/frm.elm-me+ by mailutils'
  dpkg: error processing mailutils_20020904-2_i386.deb (--install):
   trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/messages', which is also in package elm-me+
  dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   mailutils_20020904-2_i386.deb

Thanks,

Matej

ubit_2.6.0-1_i386.changes is NEW

2002-10-02 Thread Debian Installer 
(new) libubit-dev_2.6.0-1_i386.deb optional devel
Development files for libubit2.6.0
 This package contains all the headers and static libraries needed to build
 applications that will use the libubit2.6.0 library.
(new) libubit2.6.0_2.6.0-1_i386.deb optional libs
Ubiquitous Brick Interactive Toolkit
 Ubit is a new graphical library. It is a brick construction game model for
 creating graphical user interfaces.
ubit_2.6.0-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/u/ubit/ubit_2.6.0-1.diff.gz
ubit_2.6.0-1.dsc
  to pool/main/u/ubit/ubit_2.6.0-1.dsc
ubit_2.6.0.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/u/ubit/ubit_2.6.0.orig.tar.gz
Changes: ubit (2.6.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
  * QA upload.
  * New upstream release.  Soname unspecified, so use the version number.
Closes: #148101.
  * Package is orphaned (#154093); set maintainer to Debian QA Group.
  * Switch to debhelper 4.
  * Move from /usr/X11R6 to /usr.
  * Update build dependencies.
  * debian/copyright: Refer to /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL.
  * debian/README.Debian: Version numbering is consistent now; remove.
  * Conforms to Standards version 3.5.7.
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 148101 


Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of
the override file.  It is ok otherwise, so please be patient.  New
packages are usually added to the override file about once a week.

You may have gotten the distribution wrong.  You'll get warnings above
if files already exist in other distributions.

Bug#163137: elm-me+: Does not handle de_DE@euro locale well

2002-10-02 Thread Thomas Koenig 
Package: elm-me+
Version: 2.4pl25ME+99c-2
Severity: normal

There's still what appears to be a spurious warning with the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] locale.  Starting up yields:

$ elm
Give "hostname", "hostfullname" and "hostdomain" on RC file: /etc/elm-me+/elm.rc
Elm: Unable to map [EMAIL PROTECTED] locale (LC_CTYPE) to MIME charset.
 Codeset name ISO-8859-15 was unknown. Treating ISO-8859-15 as MIME name.
 Check /etc/elm-me+/elm.mimecharsets or /home/ig25/.elm/mime.charsets
Problem with locale (system character set)! Elm ME+ will behave erratically.

The characters appear to be treated correctly, though.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux meiner 2.4.18 #4 Mon Jun 17 20:14:20 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Versions of packages elm-me+ depends on:
ii  exim [mail-transport-age 3.36-3  An MTA (Mail Transport Agent)
ii  libc62.2.5-14.3  GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libncurses5  5.2.20020112a-8 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libssl0.9.6  0.9.6g-6SSL shared libraries

-- no debconf information

saml_970418-10_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2002-10-02 Thread Debian Installer 

Accepted:
saml_970418-10.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/saml/saml_970418-10.diff.gz
saml_970418-10.dsc
  to pool/main/s/saml/saml_970418-10.dsc
saml_970418-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/saml/saml_970418-10_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 161554 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.