ines_2.0-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2002-09-29 Thread Debian Installer 

Accepted:
ines_2.0-1.diff.gz
  to pool/non-free/i/ines/ines_2.0-1.diff.gz
ines_2.0-1.dsc
  to pool/non-free/i/ines/ines_2.0-1.dsc
ines_2.0-1_i386.deb
  to pool/non-free/i/ines/ines_2.0-1_i386.deb
ines_2.0.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/non-free/i/ines/ines_2.0.orig.tar.gz
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

tk707_0.7.21-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2002-09-29 Thread Debian Installer 

Accepted:
tk707_0.7.21-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/tk707/tk707_0.7.21-4.diff.gz
tk707_0.7.21-4.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tk707/tk707_0.7.21-4.dsc
tk707_0.7.21-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/tk707/tk707_0.7.21-4_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 155206 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Bug#149314: Additional Information

2002-09-29 Thread Stefan Denker 
If not executed directly but from a program (on my machine licq) wavp
starts filling my Harddisk. ca 100MB a minute. I am not able to locate
these data, and with a reboot this extra data is erased, it seems.

hth

Stefan

-- 
The world belongs, however, to those who can look at the glass and say:
"Whats up with this glass? Excuse me? Excuse me? _This_ is my glass? I
don't think so. _My_ glass was full! _And_ it was a bigger glass!
[Terry Pratchett, The truth]


pgpXFk7UqouP8.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Processed: Updating submitter address

2002-09-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> close 108324
Bug#108324: timeoutd: X session in use kills or prevents timeoutd from running 
-- /devfs system
Bug#108326: timeoutd: X session in use kills timeoutd or prevents from running 
-- /devfs system
Bug closed, send any further explanations to "D.W.Wieboldt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> reopen 108324 "D.W.Wieboldt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bug#108324: timeoutd: X session in use kills or prevents timeoutd from running 
-- /devfs system
Bug#108326: timeoutd: X session in use kills timeoutd or prevents from running 
-- /devfs system
Bug reopened, originator set to "D.W.Wieboldt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#108324: marked as done (timeoutd: X session in use kills or prevents timeoutd from running -- /devfs system)

2002-09-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated 29 Sep 2002 20:33:14 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line timeoutd: X session in use kills or prevents timeoutd from 
running -- /devfs system
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2001 17:38:40 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 10 12:38:40 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from palrel2.hp.com [156.153.255.234] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15VGF6-0001x5-00; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:38:40 -0500
Received: from texatrium.dazel.com (texatrium.austin.hp.com [15.23.62.6])
by palrel2.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38EC118C0
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 10:38:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shiloh.cs.austin.hp.com (shiloh.cs.austin.hp.com [15.23.58.160])
by texatrium.dazel.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f7AHbvi15022
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:38:10 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (qmail 5542 invoked by uid 1001); 10 Aug 2001 17:43:40 -
Date: 10 Aug 2001 17:43:40 -
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "D.W.Wieboldt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: timeoutd: X session in use kills or prevents timeoutd from running -- 
/devfs system
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: timeoutd
Version: 1.5-3
Severity: normal


-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux shiloh 2.4.7 #1 Mon Jul 23 22:54:51 CDT 2001 i586 unknown

Versions of the packages timeoutd depends on:
ii  libc6  2.2.3-9GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone

--- Begin /etc/timeouts (modified conffile)
Al:*:nyx:*:20:5:10:2

--- End /etc/timeouts

--- Example try to start with X session logged in.  Syslog says:
Aug 10 12:15:16 localhost timeoutd[4116]: Daemon started.
Aug 10 12:15:17 localhost timeoutd[4116]: Exiting - Can't get status of
user dww's terminal (/dev/:0)

-- Example daemon running and login X.  Syslog says:
Aug 10 12:40:30 localhost timeoutd[4297]: Exiting - Can't get status of
user dww's terminal (/dev/:0)

User dww is on pts/2

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
Received: (at 108324-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2002 18:46:11 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 29 13:46:11 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17vj50-0003kn-00; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 13:46:10 -0500
Received: from fuzz.uucp ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [193.198.129.50])
by jagor.srce.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g8TIj9QR017416
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 20:45:10 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mvela by fuzz.uucp with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 17visU-00023V-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 20:33:14 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: timeoutd: X session in use kills or prevents timeoutd from running 
-- /devfs system
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 29 Sep 2002 20:33:14 +0200
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 5
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

If this is still a problem for you, please send us the output of last(1).

Thanks,

Matej

Bug#108326: marked as done (timeoutd: X session in use kills timeoutd or prevents from running -- /devfs system)

2002-09-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated 29 Sep 2002 20:33:14 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line timeoutd: X session in use kills or prevents timeoutd from 
running -- /devfs system
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2001 17:50:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 10 12:50:29 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from atlrel2.hp.com [156.153.255.202] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15VGQX-0002y3-00; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:50:29 -0500
Received: from texatrium.dazel.com (texatrium.austin.hp.com [15.23.62.6])
by atlrel2.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD32FB3
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 13:50:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from shiloh.cs.austin.hp.com (shiloh.cs.austin.hp.com [15.23.58.160])
by texatrium.dazel.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f7AHnai15836
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:50:02 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (qmail 6215 invoked by uid 10238); 10 Aug 2001 17:55:20 -
Date: 10 Aug 2001 17:55:20 -
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: timeoutd: X session in use kills timeoutd or prevents from running -- 
/devfs system
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: timeoutd
Version: 1.5-3
Severity: normal


-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux shiloh 2.4.7 #1 Mon Jul 23 22:54:51 CDT 2001 i586 unknown

Versions of the packages timeoutd depends on:
ii  libc6  2.2.3-9GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone

--- Begin /etc/timeouts (modified conffile)
Al:*:nyx:*:20:5:10:2

--- End /etc/timeouts

--- Example try to start with X session logged in.  Syslog says:
Aug 10 12:15:16 localhost timeoutd[4116]: Daemon started.
Aug 10 12:15:17 localhost timeoutd[4116]: Exiting - Can't get status of
user dww's terminal (/dev/:0)

-- Example daemon running and login X.  Syslog says:
Aug 10 12:40:30 localhost timeoutd[4297]: Exiting - Can't get status of
user dww's terminal (/dev/:0)

User dww is on pts/2



---
Received: (at 108324-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2002 18:46:11 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 29 13:46:11 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17vj50-0003kn-00; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 13:46:10 -0500
Received: from fuzz.uucp ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [193.198.129.50])
by jagor.srce.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g8TIj9QR017416
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 20:45:10 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mvela by fuzz.uucp with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 17visU-00023V-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 20:33:14 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: timeoutd: X session in use kills or prevents timeoutd from running 
-- /devfs system
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 29 Sep 2002 20:33:14 +0200
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 5
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

If this is still a problem for you, please send us the output of last(1).

Thanks,

Matej

elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2002-09-29 Thread Debian Installer 

Accepted:
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.diff.gz
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.dsc
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.dsc
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1_i386.deb
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c.orig.tar.gz
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 111792 122807 128027 134742 142195 144156 82916 7 95490 98494 
99521 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Bug#122274: elm-me+: newmail can't parse mailbox

2002-09-29 Thread Matej Vela 
tags 122274 unreproducible
thanks

Nathan A.Ferch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Package: elm-me+
> Version: 2.4pl25ME+95-1
> Severity: important
> 
> [w]newmail seems to have lost the ability to parse mailboxes sometime
> between 2.4pl25ME+66-1 and 2.4pl25ME+95-1. i've dug through the source a
> little and it seems to be able to detect that a new email has arrived,
> but doesn't seem to be able to parse out the subject and the sender. this
> renders the newmail program virtually useless since the only notification of a
> new email message is a blank line.
> 
> unfortunately i don't have a woody machine running sendmail to see if this is
> MTA related.
[...]

I'm sorry, but I can't reproduce this.  Can you try version
2.4pl25ME+99c-1 from unstable?

Thanks,

Matej

Processed: Re: elm-me+: newmail can't parse mailbox

2002-09-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 122274 unreproducible
Bug#122274: elm-me+: newmail can't parse mailbox
Tags added: unreproducible

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: elm-me+ housekeeping

2002-09-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 82908 elm-me+: editing headers with arrows
Bug#82908: "Firewalled IMAP, not POP3" problem.
Changed Bug title.

> severity 82908 wishlist
Bug#82908: elm-me+: editing headers with arrows
Severity set to `wishlist'.

> forwarded 82908 Kari Hurtta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bug#82908: elm-me+: editing headers with arrows
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to Kari Hurtta <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>.

> tags 141183 moreinfo
Bug#141183: elm-me+: Please use alternatives for /usr/bin/frm
Tags added: moreinfo

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#111792: marked as done (failure to build on ia64)

2002-09-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:48:32 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#111792: fixed in elm-me+ 2.4pl25ME+99c-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2001 17:50:43 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 09 12:50:43 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from merulo.external.hp.com (merulo.debian.org) [192.25.206.12] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15g8jD-0002d0-00; Sun, 09 Sep 2001 12:50:43 -0500
Received: from winfree.gag.com [192.133.104.8] 
by merulo.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.32 1 (Debian))
id 15g8jC-0004QK-00; Sun, 09 Sep 2001 11:50:42 -0600
Received: from rover.gag.com (rover.gag.com [192.133.104.32])
by winfree.gag.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7228A24BF5
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun,  9 Sep 2001 11:50:41 -0600 (MDT)
Received: by rover.gag.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 32A2C3BDD7; Sun,  9 Sep 2001 11:48:53 -0600 (MDT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: failure to build on ia64
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun,  9 Sep 2001 11:48:53 -0600 (MDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bdale Garbee)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: elm-me+
Version: 2.4pl25ME+94-1
Severity: serious

This version of the package fails to build on ia64, apparently because PIC
and non-PIC code are being mixed at link time?

  /usr/bin/ld: mk_aliases.o: @gprel relocation against dynamic symbol 
is_system

Bdale

---
Received: (at 111792-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2002 19:53:08 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 29 14:53:08 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17vk7n-0006lw-00; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 14:53:08 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 17vk3M-0005v1-00; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:48:32 -0400
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.26 $
Subject: Bug#111792: fixed in elm-me+ 2.4pl25ME+99c-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:48:32 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
elm-me+, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.diff.gz
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.dsc
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.dsc
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1_i386.deb
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated elm-me+ package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 20:00:02 +0200
Source: elm-me+
Binary: elm-me+
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.4pl25ME+99c-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 elm-me+- MIME & PGP-aware interactive mail reader [enhanced]
Closes: 82916 7 95490 98494 99521 111792 122807 128027 134742 142195 144156
Changes: 
 elm-me+ (2.4pl25ME+99c-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * New upstream version:
 - Uses nl_langinfo(CODESET), making locale-to-charset mappings
   unnecessary (PL96).  Closes: #82916, #98494, #122807.
 - Fixes yes/no messages (PL96).  Closes: #95490.
 - Links nfrm.1 to frm.1 (PL96b).  Closes: #99521.
 - Compiles shared objects with `-fPIC' (PL97c).  Closes: #111792.
 - fastmail handles `-' as standard input (PL98c).  Closes: #142195.
 - No superfluous calls to stat(2) (PL99).  Closes: #134742.
   * Apply patches from 
 (upstream is busy, but ex

Bug#122807: marked as done (elm doesn't handle italian charsets)

2002-09-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:48:32 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#122807: fixed in elm-me+ 2.4pl25ME+99c-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Dec 2001 11:38:53 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 07 05:38:53 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from full135.sara.unitn.it (dizzy.dz.net) [193.205.210.135] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16CJLA-00018k-00; Fri, 07 Dec 2001 05:38:53 -0600
Received: from dizzy.dz.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by dizzy.dz.net (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -2) with ESMTP id fB7Bco83006034
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 12:38:50 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by dizzy.dz.net (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -2) id fB7Bcn5o006032
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 12:38:49 +0100
From: Massimo Dal Zotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: elm doesn't handle italian charsets
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 12:38:49 +0100 (MET)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL89 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: elm-me+
Version: 2.4pl25ME+89-2

When I set LC_CTYPE to an italian charset elm complains about the MIME
charset and delays its startup for 13 seconds, which is very annoying:

$ export LC_CTYPE=it_IT
$ elm
Elm: Unable to map it_IT locale (LC_CTYPE) to MIME charset
 Using default (US-ASCII). Check /etc/elm-me+/elm.mimecharsets or
  /home/dz/.elm/mime.charsets
Problem with locale (system character set)! Elm ME+ will behave erratically.

The following patch fixes the bug:

--- /etc/elm-me+/elm.mimecharsets.orig  Wed Dec  5 12:09:33 2001
+++ /etc/elm-me+/elm.mimecharsets   Wed Dec  5 12:13:01 2001
@@ -110,7 +110,8 @@
 #hrvatski (unknown)
 #hungarian (unknown)
 #icelandic (unknown)
-#italian (unknown)
+it_IT ISO-8859-1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15
 ja_JP EUC-JP
 ja_JP.ujis (unsupported)
 #japanese (unknown)

Also in my opinion the message delay should be shortened to 2-3 second
and it should be possible to end it immediately by pressing .

-- 
Massimo Dal Zotto

+--+
|  Massimo Dal Zotto   email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |
|  Via Marconi, 141phone: ++39-461534251   |
|  38057 Pergine Valsugana (TN)  www: http://www.cs.unitn.it/~dz/  |
|  Italy  http://www.debian.org/~dz/   |
|  gpg:   2DB65596  3CED BDC6 4F23 BEDA F489 2445 147F 1AEA 2DB6 5596  |
+--+

---
Received: (at 122807-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2002 19:53:07 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 29 14:53:07 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17vk7n-0006ll-00; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 14:53:07 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 17vk3M-0005v3-00; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:48:32 -0400
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.26 $
Subject: Bug#122807: fixed in elm-me+ 2.4pl25ME+99c-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:48:32 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
elm-me+, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.diff.gz
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.dsc
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.dsc
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1_i386.deb
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated elm-me+ package)

(This message was generated automatically at thei

Bug#128027: marked as done (elm-me+: misplaced man-files w/ an incorrect name)

2002-09-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:48:32 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#128027: fixed in elm-me+ 2.4pl25ME+99c-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jan 2002 16:13:08 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 06 10:13:08 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from urc1.cc.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.10.3] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16NFv2-00051L-00; Sun, 06 Jan 2002 10:13:08 -0600
Received: from debian (10-67-80-9.kotnet.org [10.67.80.9])
by urc1.cc.kuleuven.ac.be (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g06GCWjG020812
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 6 Jan 2002 17:12:32 +0100
Received: from debian
([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost ident=michael)
by debian with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id 16NFuS-00068f-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 06 Jan 2002 17:12:32 +0100
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2002 17:12:32 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: elm-me+: misplaced man-files w/ an incorrect name
From: Michael Osamu Shiobara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1.52 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.1 (AOI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: elm-me+
Version: 2.4pl25ME+94-1.1
Severity: normal

Hello,

There are two problems ...

(1) The following man-files are misplaced. They should be installed
in `/usr/share/man/man1/' instead of `/usr/share/man/':

/usr/share/man/answer.n.gz
/usr/share/man/checkalias.n.gz
/usr/share/man/elm.n.gz
/usr/share/man/elmalias.n.gz
/usr/share/man/elmcharset.n.gz
/usr/share/man/elmterminal.n.gz
/usr/share/man/elmunidata.n.gz
/usr/share/man/fastmail.n.gz
/usr/share/man/frm.n.gz
/usr/share/man/listalias.n.gz
/usr/share/man/messages.n.gz
/usr/share/man/newalias.n.gz
/usr/share/man/newmail.n.gz
/usr/share/man/printmail.n.gz
/usr/share/man/readmsg.n.gz
/usr/share/man/wnewmail.n.gz

(2) These man files have an incorrect name. For example,
`elm.n.gz' should read `elm.1.gz'. In other words,
the suffix of filename should be `.1.gz' in place of
`.n.gz'.

Thank you for your packaging efforts.

Best regards,

Michael

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux debian 2.4.17 #1 Tue Dec 25 22:06:51 CET 2001 i686 unknown

Versions of the packages elm-me+ depends on:
ii  libc6  2.2.4-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii  libncurses55.2.20010318-3 Shared libraries for terminal handling
ii  exim   3.33-1.1   Exim Mailer
^^^ (Provides virtual package mail-transport-agent)

---
Received: (at 128027-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2002 19:55:31 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 29 14:55:31 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17vkA6-00072L-00; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 14:55:30 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 17vk3M-0005v5-00; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:48:32 -0400
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.26 $
Subject: Bug#128027: fixed in elm-me+ 2.4pl25ME+99c-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:48:32 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
elm-me+, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.diff.gz
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.dsc
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.dsc
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1_i386.deb
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated elm-me+ package)

(This message was

Bug#95490: marked as done (Elm doesn't show "Yes/No" messages (often).)

2002-09-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:48:33 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#95490: fixed in elm-me+ 2.4pl25ME+99c-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Apr 2001 17:16:18 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 27 12:16:17 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from femail13.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.140] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14tBqr-0002yJ-00; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 12:16:17 -0500
Received: from Athlon ([24.16.221.207]) by femail13.sdc1.sfba.home.com
  (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with ESMTP
  id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 10:16:08 -0700
Received: from pehasys by Athlon with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 14tBqi-0007FN-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 10:16:08 -0700
Subject: Elm doesn't show "Yes/No" messages (often).
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 10:16:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL89 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender:  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: elm-me+
Version: 2.4pl25ME+89-1
Severity: wishlist

I've noticed this in the current version in unstable. It works fine in
2.4pl25ME+73-2. When you quit or when you change folders, there are usually
questions like "Move read messages to "received" folder? (y/n)". Pressing y
or n would generate "Yes" or "No" strings at the "answer" spot. Since there
is usually some delay after that you may want to press some key again
expecting those Yes/No strings and causing Elm behave unexpectedly (you
would expect that Yes/No show up and then do what you asked it to).

If this is not very clear, I may try to rephrase it. :-)

I usually use Elm under xterm which along with new ncurses brings some
terminal problems, like Backspace doesn't work anymore - in Elm it works
occasionally.

 - Peter.

---
Received: (at 95490-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2002 19:55:35 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 29 14:55:34 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17vkAA-00075j-00; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 14:55:34 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 17vk3N-0005vH-00; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:48:33 -0400
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.26 $
Subject: Bug#95490: fixed in elm-me+ 2.4pl25ME+99c-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:48:33 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
elm-me+, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.diff.gz
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.dsc
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.dsc
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1_i386.deb
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated elm-me+ package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 20:00:02 +0200
Source: elm-me+
Binary: elm-me+
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.4pl25ME+99c-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 elm-me+- MIME & PGP-aware interactive mail reader [enhanced]
Closes: 82916 7 95490 98494 99521 111792 122807 128027 134742 142195 144156
Changes: 
 elm-me+ (2.4pl25ME+9

Bug#99521: marked as done (elm-me+: Missing symlinks for some man pages)

2002-09-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:48:33 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#99521: fixed in elm-me+ 2.4pl25ME+99c-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jun 2001 18:03:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 01 13:03:29 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 155tGh-0004fW-00; Fri, 01 Jun 2001 13:03:27 -0500
Received: from cjwatson by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 155tGh-0001wv-00; Fri, 01 Jun 2001 14:03:27 -0400
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: elm-me+: Missing symlinks for some man pages
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 14:03:27 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: elm-me+
Severity: normal

Hi,

An upcoming release of Debian policy, version 3.5.5.0, contains an amendment
which clarifies the way man pages need to be installed.

Until now, packages could install /usr/share/man/man1/foo.1.gz with 'foo,
bar \- programs to do something' in the NAME section and have no
corresponding symbolic link from bar.1.gz (policy suggested using a symbolic
link, but wasn't clear that it's required), and our man program happened to
magically figure it out for itself and display the right man page when you
typed 'man bar'. However, guaranteeing that this would work even when you've
recently installed some new packages has a serious performance impact on
man, as it frequently has to go and look through the filesystem to update
its database.

Before woody's base system is frozen, I intend to remove this "feature" from
man-db, so that its performance is consistent and acceptable for a
reasonable number of people. It isn't a standard feature even among the
various man page browsers in Debian, let alone in other Linux distributions,
so there should be no compatibility problems. However, your package seems to
rely on it, so this bug is being filed to let you know that the way some of
your man pages are installed needs to be improved in order to work properly
in woody. All you need to do, if you already have, say, foo(1) and expect
bar(1) to work as well, is install a symbolic link to foo.1.gz as bar.1.gz
(.so links and hard links are also OK, though symlinks are recommended).

Here's a list of man pages and the names that don't appear anywhere in the
filesystem:

  usr/share/man/man1/frm.1.gz: nfrm

If the list looks odd, please check man(7) to see if the man page is
formatted properly. This output was generated by way of mandb, so if it's
confused then users will be too; if it turns out that it's done the wrong
thing, please reassign this bug to man-db so that I can fix it. I might not
have caught symlinks that are created in the postinst (say, using
alternatives); if that's the case, please close this bug.

Please see bug #94995 and policy 3.5.5 section 13.1 for more information,
and feel free to contact me if you need help.

Thanks,

-- 
Colin Watson, via a script

---
Received: (at 99521-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2002 19:55:35 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 29 14:55:35 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17vkAB-00077K-00; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 14:55:35 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 17vk3N-0005vL-00; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:48:33 -0400
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.26 $
Subject: Bug#99521: fixed in elm-me+ 2.4pl25ME+99c-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:48:33 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
elm-me+, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.diff.gz
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.dsc
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.dsc
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1_i386.deb
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this versio

Bug#151301: marked as done (elm-me+: missing manpages)

2002-09-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:48:32 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#128027: fixed in elm-me+ 2.4pl25ME+99c-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jun 2002 19:11:37 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 28 14:11:37 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from moutvdomng0.kundenserver.de (moutvdomng0.schlund.de) 
[195.20.224.130] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17O19d-0002UE-00; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 14:11:37 -0500
Received: from [172.19.20.62] (helo=mrvdomng1.kundenserver.de)
by moutvdomng0.schlund.de with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #2)
id 17O19c-00055R-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 21:11:36 +0200
Received: from [217.2.138.157] (helo=meiner)
by mrvdomng1.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #2)
id 17O19b-0006pt-00; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 21:11:35 +0200
Received: from ig25 by meiner with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17O1A4-000292-00; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 21:12:04 +0200
Subject: elm-me+: missing manpages
From: "Thomas Koenig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.42
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 21:12:02 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: elm-me+
Version: 2.4pl25ME+95-3
Severity: important

None of the man pages for the different commands are found by
version 2.3.20-20 of man-db:

elm answer checkalias elmalias fastmail frm listalias messages
newalias newmail printmail readmsg wnewmail nfrm

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux meiner 2.4.18 #4 Mon Jun 17 20:14:20 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Versions of packages elm-me+ depends on:
ii  exim [mail-transport-age 3.35-1  An MTA (Mail Transport Agent)
ii  libc62.2.5-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libncurses5  5.2.20020112a-8 Shared libraries for terminal hand

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 128027-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2002 19:55:31 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 29 14:55:31 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17vkA6-00072L-00; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 14:55:30 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 17vk3M-0005v5-00; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:48:32 -0400
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.26 $
Subject: Bug#128027: fixed in elm-me+ 2.4pl25ME+99c-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:48:32 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
elm-me+, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.diff.gz
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.dsc
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.dsc
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1_i386.deb
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated elm-me+ package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 20:00:02 +0200
Source: elm-me+
Binary: elm-me+
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.4pl25ME+99c-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 elm-me+- MIME & PGP-aware interactive mail reader [enhanced]
Closes: 82916 7 95490 98494 99521 111792 122807 128027 134742 142195 144156
Changes: 
 elm-me+ (2.4pl25ME+99c-1) unstable; urgency=l

Bug#142195: marked as done (elm-me+: fastmail doesn't accept input from stdin anymore)

2002-09-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:48:32 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#142195: fixed in elm-me+ 2.4pl25ME+99c-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Apr 2002 13:58:39 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 10 08:58:39 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from square.phys.uu.nl (square.localdomain) [131.211.34.218] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16vIcR-00084m-00; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 08:58:39 -0500
Received: from richard.localdomain ([192.168.1.3] ident=mail)
by square.localdomain with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 16vIcW-0006AH-00; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 15:58:44 +0200
Received: from bas by richard.localdomain with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 16vIcP-0001cI-00; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 15:58:37 +0200
From: Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: elm-me+: fastmail doesn't accept input from stdin anymore
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.49
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 15:58:37 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: elm-me+
Version: 2.4pl25ME+95-2
Severity: important

Sometime in the recent pst, fastmail stopped accepting input from stdin. 
Before, something like "echo test | fastmail -s test - [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
used to work. With the current version, a mail with an empty body is
delivered.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux richard 2.4.13-ac5 #1 SMP Wed Oct 31 21:26:56 CET 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB

Versions of packages elm-me+ depends on:
ii  exim [mail-transport-age 3.35-1  An MTA (Mail Transport Agent)
ii  libc62.2.5-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libncurses5  5.2.20020112a-7 Shared libraries for terminal hand


---
Received: (at 142195-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2002 19:55:32 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 29 14:55:31 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17vkA7-000739-00; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 14:55:31 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 17vk3M-0005v9-00; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:48:32 -0400
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.26 $
Subject: Bug#142195: fixed in elm-me+ 2.4pl25ME+99c-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:48:32 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
elm-me+, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.diff.gz
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.dsc
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.dsc
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1_i386.deb
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated elm-me+ package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 20:00:02 +0200
Source: elm-me+
Binary: elm-me+
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.4pl25ME+99c-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 elm-me+- MIME & PGP-aware interactive mail reader [enhanced]
Closes: 82916 7 95490 98494 99521 111792 122807 128027 134742 142195 144156
Changes: 
 elm-me+ (2.4pl25ME+99c-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * New upstream version:
 - Uses nl_langinfo(CODESET), making locale-to-charset mappings
   unnecessary (PL96).  Closes: #82916,

Bug#134742: marked as done (elm-me+: elm stats dirents in $MAIL path, triggering autofs)

2002-09-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:48:32 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#134742: fixed in elm-me+ 2.4pl25ME+99c-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Feb 2002 19:47:44 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 19 13:47:44 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp01.uc3m.es (smtp.uc3m.es) [163.117.136.121] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16dGEp-0006sA-00; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 13:47:43 -0600
Received: from smtp01.uc3m.es (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95FA443144
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 20:47:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from arpa.it.uc3m.es (arpa.it.uc3m.es [163.117.139.120])
by smtp01.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC4399E31
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 20:47:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from karajan.it.uc3m.es (karajan.it.uc3m.es [163.117.139.39])
by arpa.it.uc3m.es (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA26209;
Tue, 19 Feb 2002 20:47:41 +0100
Received: from karajan.it.uc3m.es (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by karajan.it.uc3m.es (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -5) with ESMTP id 
g1JKlmcU002866;
Tue, 19 Feb 2002 20:47:48 GMT
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by karajan.it.uc3m.es (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -5) id g1JKlikH002863;
Tue, 19 Feb 2002 20:47:44 GMT
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 20:47:44 GMT
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: elm-me+: elm stats dirents in $MAIL path, triggering autofs
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: elm-me+
Version: 2.4pl25ME+89-2
Severity: important


-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux karajan 2.4.16 #5 SMP Mon Feb 18 19:06:11 GMT 2002 i686 
unknown

Versions of the packages elm-me+ depends on:
ii  libc6  2.2.4-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii  libncurses55.2.20020112a- Shared libraries for terminal handling
ii  sendmail   8.12.1-5   A powerful, efficient, and scalable Mail Tra
^^^ (Provides virtual package mail-transport-agent)


Elm appears to search dirents under every component of the $MAIL path
with stat64. When some of these components have softlinks pointing into
an autofs-controlled areas (e.g. cdrom, or NFS mounts), the stat64
triggers autofs to launch these mounts. This certainly causes delays,
and may cause timeouts and unexpected behaviours of the rest of the
system and. In fact, it does (here).

Here is the relevant part of a strace from the command


echo hola | elm ptb

where $MAIL has value /usr/spool/mail/ptb. Note the stat64's on
the other root directories, and subdirectories of /usr.


...
write(10, "hola\n", 5)  = 5
close(11)   = 0
munmap(0x4001c000, 4096)= 0
_llseek(10, 0, [0], SEEK_SET)   = 0
stat64("/", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=1024, ...}) = 0
access("/", R_OK)   = 0
open("/dev/null", O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_DIRECTORY) = -1 ENOTDIR (Not a directory
)
open("/", O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_DIRECTORY) = 11
fstat64(11, {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=1024, ...}) = 0
fcntl64(11, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC)= 0
getdents64(0xb, 0x811ebf0, 0x1000, 0x2) = 656
stat64("/lost+found", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=12288, ...}) = 0
stat64("/root", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=1024, ...}) = 0
stat64("/var", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=1024, ...}) = 0
stat64("/usr", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
stat64("/boot", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=1024, ...}) = 0
stat64("/vmlinuz", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=1042807, ...}) = 0
stat64("/tmp", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|S_ISVTX|0777, st_size=3072, ...}) = 0
stat64("/lib", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
stat64("/sbin", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=3072, ...}) = 0
stat64("/etc", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=5120, ...}) = 0
stat64("/bin", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=2048, ...}) = 0
stat64("/dev", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=20480, ...}) = 0
stat64("/home", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|S_ISGID|0775, st_size=1024, ...}) = 0
stat64("/mnt", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=1024, ...}) = 0
stat64("/proc", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0555, st_size=0, ...}) = 0
stat64("/floppy", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=1024, ...}) = 0
stat64("/cdrom", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=1024, ...}) = 0
stat64("/initrd", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_s

Bug#82916: marked as done (elm: Unable to map aliased locale to charset)

2002-09-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:48:32 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#82916: fixed in elm-me+ 2.4pl25ME+99c-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jan 2001 00:52:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 19 18:52:14 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp-rt-2.wanadoo.fr (apeiba.wanadoo.fr) [:::193.252.19.154] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14JmGM-0004iU-00; Fri, 19 Jan 2001 18:52:14 -0600
Received: from mahonia.wanadoo.fr (193.252.19.58) by apeiba.wanadoo.fr; 20 Jan 
2001 01:52:12 +0100
Received: from bylbo.nowhere.earth (62.161.73.62) by mahonia.wanadoo.fr; 20 Jan 
2001 01:52:12 +0100
Received: from dwitch by bylbo.nowhere.earth with local (Exim 3.20 #1 (Debian))
id 14JmTf-ko-00; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 02:05:59 +0100
From: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: elm: Unable to map aliased locale to charset
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.9
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.9
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 02:05:57 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: elm-me+
Version: 2.4pl25ME+87-1
Severity: normal

$ frm
Elm: Unable to map français locale (LC_CTYPE) to MIME charset
 Using default (US-ASCII). Check /etc/elm-me+/elm.mimecharsets or
  /home/dwitch/.elm/mime.charsets
Problem with locale (system character set)! Elm ME+ will behave erratically.
[...normal output follows]

"français" (as well as "french", which causes the same behaviour) is
an alias to "fr_FR.ISO-8859-1".  OTOH using the "fr_FR.ISO-8859-1"
locale directly does not exhibit this problem.

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bylbo 2.2.18 #1 Wed Dec 20 23:25:48 CET 2000 i586

Versions of packages elm-me+ depends on:
ii  exim [mail-transport-agent]   3.20-1 Exim Mailer   
ii  libc6 2.2.1-1GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libncurses5   5.0-8  Shared libraries for terminal hand


---
Received: (at 82916-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2002 19:53:06 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 29 14:53:05 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17vk7k-0006ky-00; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 14:53:05 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 17vk3M-0005vD-00; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:48:32 -0400
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.26 $
Subject: Bug#82916: fixed in elm-me+ 2.4pl25ME+99c-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:48:32 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
elm-me+, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.diff.gz
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.dsc
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.dsc
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1_i386.deb
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated elm-me+ package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 20:00:02 +0200
Source: elm-me+
Binary: elm-me+
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.4pl25ME+99c-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 elm-me+- MIME & PGP-aware interactive mail reader [enhanced]
Closes: 82916 7 95490 98494 99521 111792 122807 128027 134742 14

Bug#144156: marked as done (improper LIB path in man pages)

2002-09-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:48:32 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#144156: fixed in elm-me+ 2.4pl25ME+99c-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Apr 2002 04:25:19 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 22 23:25:19 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from twinlark.arctic.org [208.44.199.239] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16zrrj-000196-00; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 23:25:19 -0500
Received: (qmail 25031 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2002 04:25:18 -
Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by localhost with SMTP; 23 Apr 2002 04:25:18 -
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 21:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: dean gaudet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: improper LIB path in man pages
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-comment: visit http://arctic.org/~dean/legal for information regarding 
copyright and disclaimer.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: elm-me+
Version: 2.4pl25ME+95-3

see also 128027 for another man page problem -- which you'll need to apply
the fix for before you can type "man elm" to see the problem i'm
describing here.

the man page substition in doc/Makefile for the LIB path ends up including
the temporary install path used to build the binary .deb.  for example,
"man elm" contains stuff such as:

   /root/elm/elm-me+-2.4pl25ME+95.dg1/debian/tmp/usr/lib/elm-me+/elm.rc 
customized mailer parameters
   
/root/elm/elm-me+-2.4pl25ME+95.dg1/debian/tmp/usr/lib/elm-me+/elm.mimecharsets 
locale to MIME  charsets  map­
   ping information
   
/root/elm/elm-me+-2.4pl25ME+95.dg1/debian/tmp/usr/lib/elm-me+/elm.terminalinfo 
display   charset  switching
   method for terminals
...

whereas it should be referring to just /lib/elm-me+/elm.rc, etc.

there's two problems here -- one is that the substitution in doc/Makefile
uses LIB which has the temp binary path prepended to it.

the other is that "./debian/rules clean" should remove the doc/*.subs
file.

the patch below fixes both problems.  note that i didn't bother to include
the patch differences which would remove doc/*.subs since that would have
made the patch huge.

-dean

diff -ru elm-me+-2.4pl25ME+95.dg1/debian/changelog 
elm-me+-2.4pl25ME+95.dg2/debian/changelog
--- elm-me+-2.4pl25ME+95.dg1/debian/changelog   Mon Apr 22 21:13:10 2002
+++ elm-me+-2.4pl25ME+95.dg2/debian/changelog   Mon Apr 22 21:15:23 2002
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+elm-me+ (2.4pl25ME+95-3.dg2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * doc/*.subs files should be cleaned as well, they don't belong
+in the source archive
+  * when building doc/*.subs files we should use the LIB without
+the temporary install prefix
+
+ -- dean gaudet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Mon, 22 Apr 2002 21:14:34 -0700
+
 elm-me+ (2.4pl25ME+95-3.dg1) unstable; urgency=low

   * fix bug#128027 -- man pages installed in wrong directory
diff -ru elm-me+-2.4pl25ME+95.dg1/debian/rules 
elm-me+-2.4pl25ME+95.dg2/debian/rules
--- elm-me+-2.4pl25ME+95.dg1/debian/rules   Mon Apr 22 20:31:58 2002
+++ elm-me+-2.4pl25ME+95.dg2/debian/rules   Mon Apr 22 21:07:52 2002
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
-rm -f hdrs/sysdefs.h
-rm -f ChangeLog.install
-rm -fr bin/*
-   -rm -fr doc/catman doc/*.fmtd
+   -rm -fr doc/catman doc/*.fmtd doc/*.subs
-rm -fr UU config.sh
-chmod -R u+rw *

diff -ru elm-me+-2.4pl25ME+95.dg1/doc/Makefile.SH 
elm-me+-2.4pl25ME+95.dg2/doc/Makefile.SH
--- elm-me+-2.4pl25ME+95.dg1/doc/Makefile.SHMon Apr 22 20:31:58 2002
+++ elm-me+-2.4pl25ME+95.dg2/doc/Makefile.SHMon Apr 22 21:10:13 2002
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
 FORMATTER  =   $roff
 FORMATTER_OPTS =   $roffopts
 LIB=   \$(DESTDIR)$lib
+REALLIB=   $lib
 LN =   $ln
 MAKE   =   $make
 MAN=   \$(DESTDIR)$mansrc
@@ -142,37 +143,37 @@
 clean:

 elm.1.subs: elm.1
-   $(SED) 's"#LIB#"$(LIB)"g;' < elm.1 > elm.1.subs
+   $(SED) 's"#LIB#"$(REALLIB)"g;' < elm.1 > elm.1.subs
 answer.1.subs: answer.1
-   $(SED) 's"#LIB#"$(LIB)"g;' < answer.1 > answer.1.subs
+   $(SED) 's"#LIB#"$(REALLIB)"g;' < answer.1 > answer.1.subs
 chkalias.1.subs: chkalias.1
-   $(SED) 's"#LIB#"$(LIB)"g;' < chkalias.1 > chkalias.1.subs
+   $(SED) 's"#LIB#"$(REALLIB)"g;' < chkalias.1 > chkalias.1.subs
 elmal

Bug#88887: marked as done (Elm should remove /etc/elm-me+ on purge)

2002-09-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:48:32 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#7: fixed in elm-me+ 2.4pl25ME+99c-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2001 02:54:20 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 07 20:54:20 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from linuxis.net (virtual-estate.net) [:::207.99.50.34] 
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14aqZI-0002D1-00; Wed, 07 Mar 2001 20:54:20 -0600
Received: (qmail 910 invoked by uid 1000); 8 Mar 2001 02:54:19 -
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 18:54:19 -0800
From: Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Elm should remove /etc/elm-me+ on purge
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: elm-me+
Version: 2.4pl25ME+87-1
Severity: minor

I just purged elm-me+ and it left an empty /etc/elm-me+ directory.

--Adam

-- 
Adam McKenna  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

---
Received: (at 7-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2002 19:55:34 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 29 14:55:34 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17vkA9-00074g-00; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 14:55:33 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 17vk3M-0005vF-00; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:48:32 -0400
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.26 $
Subject: Bug#7: fixed in elm-me+ 2.4pl25ME+99c-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:48:32 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
elm-me+, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.diff.gz
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.dsc
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.dsc
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1_i386.deb
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated elm-me+ package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 20:00:02 +0200
Source: elm-me+
Binary: elm-me+
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.4pl25ME+99c-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 elm-me+- MIME & PGP-aware interactive mail reader [enhanced]
Closes: 82916 7 95490 98494 99521 111792 122807 128027 134742 142195 144156
Changes: 
 elm-me+ (2.4pl25ME+99c-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * New upstream version:
 - Uses nl_langinfo(CODESET), making locale-to-charset mappings
   unnecessary (PL96).  Closes: #82916, #98494, #122807.
 - Fixes yes/no messages (PL96).  Closes: #95490.
 - Links nfrm.1 to frm.1 (PL96b).  Closes: #99521.
 - Compiles shared objects with `-fPIC' (PL97c).  Closes: #111792.
 - fastmail handles `-' as standard input (PL98c).  Closes: #142195.
 - No superfluous calls to stat(2) (PL99).  Closes: #134742.
   * Apply patches from 
 (upstream is busy, but expects to include them in PL100/PL101):
 - Disable RPATH for system directories.
 - Make man pages refer to /etc/elm-me+ for configuration files.
 - lib/expand.c: Expand `{etc}' as /etc/elm-me+.
 - MANIFEST: Add src/remailer.c.
 - doc/Makefile.SH: Use Configure values for man page substitutions to
   avoid substituting tempo

Bug#98494: marked as done (add cs_CZ ISO-8859-2 to elm.mimecharset)

2002-09-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:48:33 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#98494: fixed in elm-me+ 2.4pl25ME+99c-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 23 May 2001 09:14:21 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 23 04:14:21 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ns.muni.cz (aragorn.ics.muni.cz) [147.251.4.33] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 152Uij-0003Pv-00; Wed, 23 May 2001 04:14:21 -0500
Received: from anxur.fi.muni.cz ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [147.251.48.3])
by aragorn.ics.muni.cz (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA29702
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 23 May 2001 11:14:19 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from decibel.fi.muni.cz ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [147.251.51.14])
by anxur.fi.muni.cz (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA15550;
Wed, 23 May 2001 11:14:19 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from kabi by decibel.fi.muni.cz with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 152UiW-00022f-00; Wed, 23 May 2001 11:14:08 +0200
From: Zdenek Kabelac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: add cs_CZ ISO-8859-2 to elm.mimecharset
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.16
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.16
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 11:14:08 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Zdenek Kabelac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: elm-me+
Version: 2.4pl25ME+89-2
Severity: minor

Hi

I think the subject says it all

bye


-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux decibel 2.4.2-ac5 #1 Út úno 27 18:13:57 EST 2001 i586
Locale: LANG=cs_CZ, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages elm-me+ depends on:
ii  exim [mail-transport-agen 3.22-4 Exim Mailer   
ii  libc6 2.2.3-1GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libncurses5   5.2.20010318-1 Shared libraries for terminal hand


---
Received: (at 98494-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2002 19:53:04 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 29 14:53:04 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17vk7k-0006kn-00; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 14:53:04 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 17vk3N-0005vJ-00; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:48:33 -0400
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.26 $
Subject: Bug#98494: fixed in elm-me+ 2.4pl25ME+99c-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:48:33 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
elm-me+, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.diff.gz
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.dsc
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1.dsc
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c-1_i386.deb
elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/e/elm-me+/elm-me+_2.4pl25ME+99c.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated elm-me+ package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 20:00:02 +0200
Source: elm-me+
Binary: elm-me+
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.4pl25ME+99c-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 elm-me+- MIME & PGP-aware interactive mail reader [enhanced]
Closes: 82916 7 95490 98494 99521 111792 122807 128027 134742 142195 144156
Changes: 
 elm-me+ (2.4pl25ME+99c-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * New upstream version:
 - Uses nl_langinfo(CODESET), making locale-to-charset mappings
   unnecessary (PL

larswm_7.2.5-1_i386.changes REJECTED

2002-09-29 Thread Debian Installer 

Rejected: larswm_7.2.5.orig.tar.gz: md5sum check failed.
Rejected: larswm_7.2.5.orig.tar.gz: actual file size (65536) does not match 
size (74162) in .changes
Rejected: larswm_7.2.5.orig.tar.gz: md5sum check failed.
Rejected: larswm_7.2.5.orig.tar.gz: actual file size (65536) does not match 
size (74162) in .dsc


===

If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.

Your rejected files are in incoming/REJECT/.  (Some may also be in
incoming/ if your .changes file was unparsable.)  If only some of the
files need to repaired, you may move any good files back to incoming/.
Please remove any bad files from incoming/REJECT/.

Bug#122274: elm-me+: newmail can't parse mailbox

2002-09-29 Thread Nathan A. Ferch 
both 2.4pl25ME+99c-1 from incoming and 2.4pl25ME+95-3 from unstable
still produce the error.

one important detail i overlooked when i submitted this bug report is
that the mailbox i was monitoring was from procmail. i tested
2.4pl25ME+95-3 with procmail disabled and it didn't produced the
problem.

i'm using procmail 3.22-4.

On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 09:57:27PM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
> tags 122274 unreproducible
> thanks
> 
> Nathan A.Ferch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > Package: elm-me+
> > Version: 2.4pl25ME+95-1
> > Severity: important
> > 
> > [w]newmail seems to have lost the ability to parse mailboxes sometime
> > between 2.4pl25ME+66-1 and 2.4pl25ME+95-1. i've dug through the source a
> > little and it seems to be able to detect that a new email has arrived,
> > but doesn't seem to be able to parse out the subject and the sender. this
> > renders the newmail program virtually useless since the only notification 
> > of a
> > new email message is a blank line.
> > 
> > unfortunately i don't have a woody machine running sendmail to see if this 
> > is
> > MTA related.
> [...]
> 
> I'm sorry, but I can't reproduce this.  Can you try version
> 2.4pl25ME+99c-1 from unstable?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Matej
--
nathan a ferch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"" -

larswm_7.2.5-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2002-09-29 Thread Debian Installer 

Accepted:
larswm_7.2.5-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/larswm/larswm_7.2.5-1.diff.gz
larswm_7.2.5-1.dsc
  to pool/main/l/larswm/larswm_7.2.5-1.dsc
larswm_7.2.5-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/l/larswm/larswm_7.2.5-1_i386.deb
larswm_7.2.5.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/larswm/larswm_7.2.5.orig.tar.gz
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.