Bug#161866: lshell: default limits uselessly low
Package: lshell Version: N/A; reported 2002-09-21 Severity: normal The default limits for lshell v2.01-11 are set for 24 open files and 30 processes. This is not enough for a user to have multiple sessions or even run a single copy of mozilla. If the admin doesn't realize lshell is installed, its very difficult to figure out where these mysterious limits are coming from. You can't even grep for it; the numbers which appear in "ulimit -a" are abreviated in /etc/lshell.conf and lshell doesn't make a note of its presence in any of the standard locations for adjusting system rlimits (e.g. /etc/limits, /etc/security/limits.conf). This renders the system effectively unusable if lshell is installed by mistake (e.g. during an upgrade when you're yessing everything that comes by). Suggested fixes: Set the defaults near the normal parameters for a debian linux system. Tweak system limits.conf with a comment to the effect that additional control is provided by lshell.conf. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux minoc 2.2.21 #1 Wed Jun 12 21:50:46 EDT 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Bug#161867: linuxconf: 2 violations of Debian PAM mini-policy
Package: linuxconf Version: 1.26r4-2 Severity: normal Hi, according to /usr/share/doc/libpam0g/Debian-PAM-MiniPolicy.gz /etc/pam.d/linuxconf-pair is wrong in 2 respects: 1. it uses a full path to the PAM module (/lib/security/pam_pwdb.so instead of pam_pwdb.so): >The file should _not_ reference the full path of the modules. It only needs >to reference the basename (eg. "pam_unix.so"). This will ensure that the >program continues to work even if the module location changes, since >libpam itself will resolve the location. 2. it uses pam_pwdb.so instead of pam_unix.so: >Under no circumstances should any program in Debian use the pam_pwdb.so >module by default. Instead the pam_unix.so module should be used. Most >programs with RedHat support/default files will reference pam_pwdb.so in >their example files. Do not use this. There are several problems with >regard to pam_pwdb.so: >... -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux jophur 2.4.18-k7 #1 Sun Apr 14 13:19:11 EST 2002 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages linuxconf depends on: ii libc62.2.5-14.3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb3 3.2.9-17Berkeley v3 Database Libraries [ru ii libgd1 1.8.4-20GD Graphics Library ii libncurses5 5.2.20020112a-8 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libpam0g 0.72-35 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpng2 1.0.12-6PNG library - runtime ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-11 The GNU stdc++ library ii libxml1 1:1.8.17-2 GNOME XML library ii logrotate3.6.5-1 Log rotation utility ii netbase 4.07Basic TCP/IP networking system ii python2.12.1.3-10An interactive object-oriented scr ii sysvinit 2.84-3 System-V like init. ii xlibs4.2.1-0pre1v1 X Window System client libraries ii zlib1g 1:1.1.4-4 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information
larswm_7.2.3-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: larswm_7.2.3-1.dsc to pool/main/l/larswm/larswm_7.2.3-1.dsc larswm_7.2.3-1.tar.gz to pool/main/l/larswm/larswm_7.2.3-1.tar.gz larswm_7.2.3-1_i386.deb to pool/main/l/larswm/larswm_7.2.3-1_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 153463 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Bug#161903: linuxconf: broken dependency on libgd1
Package: linuxconf Version: 1.26r4-2 When I invoke: apt-get install linuxconf I get: Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: linuxconf: Depends: libgd1 (>= 1.8.4-7) E: Sorry, broken packages After installing libgd1-xpm manually and and installing linuxconf with: dpkg -i --force-depends linuxconf_ the package installed and worked fine. It seems that something is broken in the virtual package libgd1. I'm using Debian GNU/Linux unstable. matthias
Trash MLM
Earning is fast and fun with Free Store Club! Get an online SUPER STORE FREE! Start saving BIG! Start earning BIG! It's NEW, FREE, and HOT! www.whang9.freestoreclub.com
Bug#134742: 我有全市最便宜的市话通和CDMA和GSM手机, cdma手机号码150元（含1000元话费
CDMA手机900元送1300话费（每分钟0。20元）= 现代1100市话通600元（含400话费 CDMA手机卡150元一张（含1000元话费）打市内电话相当于7分钱一分钟 SONY100市话通580元（送400话费 摩托罗拉老款手机120元一台 能上网的西门子3508手机430元 能上网的爱立信T29手机450元 市话通带机入台220元送400话费 详情请咨询26840989
Bug#161976: dstooltk-doc: /usr/share/doc-base/dstooltk fails to specify a section
Package: dstooltk-doc Version: 2.0-4 Severity: normal This omission results in messages from update-menus of the form In file "/usr/lib/menu/doc-base-dstooltk", at (or in the definition that ends at) line 1: [...]"doc-base" section="" title="DsTool User's Manual" [...] ^ Missing (or empty) tag: section This tag needs to defined for the menuentry to make sense. Note, BTW, that update-menus re-arranges the order of the tags found in the menu entry files, so that the part above isn't literal /etc/menu-methods//gnome-panel: Aborting Update-menus[22995]: Script /etc/menu-methods//gnome-panel returned error status 1. To fix this, please add "Section: science" to the top stanza of /usr/share/doc-base/dstooltk. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux tux 2.4.19 #1 Thu Aug 15 20:58:30 EDT 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US -- no debconf information
