Processed: Re: getty/init/X locking issues

2002-01-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 43486 wishlist
Bug#43486: respawning getty makes keyboard under X unusable
Severity set to `wishlist'.

> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Bug#43486: getty/init/X locking issues

2002-01-27 Thread LaMont Jones
severity 43486 wishlist
--
Downgrading to wishlist since the current packages play nice with each
other.  However, it would be nice if there were locking enforcement for
vt's.

lamont



Bug#131124: hkgerman: copyright doesn't seem to be DFSG-free

2002-01-27 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: hkgerman
Version: 2-11
Severity: serious

<--  snip  -->

In private email the author of this dictionary cleared the copyright.

>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 30 11:25:42 1996:

>ber das Copyright habe ich mir keine Gedanken gemacht.
>Auf jeden Fall habe ich nichts dagegegen, wenn Ihr das hk2-deutsch.tar.gz
>(evtl. auch ausgepackt oder sonstwie) der Distribution hinzufpgt. (Auf der
>S.u.S.E CD ist es auch drauf.)
>
>-- Heinz

For those who don't speak German here's a short translation (hk2-deutsch) is
the original package name):

"I never thought about the copyright. Anyway, I don't have a problem with
hk2-deutsch being part of your distribution."


<--  snip  -->


This needs some clarifications - e.g. whether it's allowed to make changes
to the source.







gqmpeg_0.11.0-2.2_i386.changes INSTALLED

2002-01-27 Thread Debian Installer

Installing:
gqmpeg_0.11.0-2.2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gqmpeg/gqmpeg_0.11.0-2.2.diff.gz
gqmpeg_0.11.0-2.2.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gqmpeg/gqmpeg_0.11.0-2.2.dsc
gqmpeg_0.11.0-2.2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gqmpeg/gqmpeg_0.11.0-2.2_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.



Bug#97040: marked as done (Standards-Version doesn't make sense)

2002-01-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 27 Jan 2002 15:25:34 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#97040: fixed in util-linux 2.11n-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 May 2001 21:35:08 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 10 16:35:08 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gnu.in-berlin.de [192.109.42.4] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14xy5R-0008EC-00; Thu, 10 May 2001 16:35:06 -0500
Received: from hirsch.in-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [213.61.118.6])
by gnu.in-berlin.de (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f4ALZ3g13689
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 10 May 2001 23:35:04 +0200 (CEST)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by hirsch.in-berlin.de (8.11.1/8.11.1/Debian 8.11.0-6) with UUCP id 
f4ALZ1811247
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 May 2001 23:35:01 +0200
X-Envelope-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Envelope-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from srittau by jroger.in-berlin.de with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 14xy37-dw-00; Thu, 10 May 2001 23:32:41 +0200
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 23:32:40 +0200
From: Sebastian Rittau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Standards-Version doesn't make sense
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.15
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: util-linux
Version: 2.11b-2
Severity: serious

The standards version does not comply to policy, section 2.4.1 (as
you know).

 - Sebastian

P.S.: I'm not aj, and my opinion differs from his in this case.


---
Received: (at 97040-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jan 2002 20:39:20 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 27 14:39:20 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16Uw5A-0005mo-00; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 14:39:20 -0600
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16Uvrq-0003Zq-00; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 15:25:34 -0500
From: LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.67 $
Subject: Bug#97040: fixed in util-linux 2.11n-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 15:25:34 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
util-linux, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive:

bsdutils_2.11n-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/u/util-linux/bsdutils_2.11n-4_i386.deb
mount_2.11n-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/u/util-linux/mount_2.11n-4_i386.deb
util-linux-locales_2.11n-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/u/util-linux/util-linux-locales_2.11n-4_all.deb
util-linux_2.11n-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/u/util-linux/util-linux_2.11n-4.diff.gz
util-linux_2.11n-4.dsc
  to pool/main/u/util-linux/util-linux_2.11n-4.dsc
util-linux_2.11n-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/u/util-linux/util-linux_2.11n-4_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated util-linux package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 11:21:41 -0700
Source: util-linux
Binary: bsdutils util-linux mount util-linux-locales
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.11n-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 bsdutils   - Basic utilities from 4.4BSD-Lite.
 mount  - Tools for mounting and manipulating filesystems.
 util-linux - Miscellaneous system utilities.
 util-linux-locales - Locales files for util-linux
Closes: 97040 130842
Changes: 
 util-linux (2.11n-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New maintainer.  Closes: #130842
   * Fix Standards-Version.  Closes: #97040
   * Loosen 

Bug#115987: marked as done (kmozilla starting is slow)

2002-01-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:52:45 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package kmozilla removed from Debian unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2001 16:36:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 17 11:36:16 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from s010.dhcp212-198-137.noos.fr (bora-bora.pacifique) 
[212.198.137.10] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15ttfz-0002e3-00; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 11:36:15 -0500
Received: by bora-bora.pacifique (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1E0914B211; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 18:43:24 +0200 (CEST)
From: daniel desages <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kmozilla starting is slow
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.31
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.31
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 18:43:24 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: kmozilla
Version: 2.2.1-1.2
Severity: normal

Rendering in kmozilla is very slow when I launch it 


-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bora-bora.pacifique 2.4.12-686 #2 Sat Oct 13 20:13:05 EST 2001 
i686
Locale: LANG=fr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Versions of packages kmozilla depends on:
ii  libc6  2.2.4-3   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdcopc1  2.2.1-1.2 C bindings for DCOP
ii  libglib1.2 1.2.10-1.2The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk1.2  1.2.10-2  The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii  libkdexparts1  2.2.1-1.2 Python bindings for DCOP
ii  libnspr4   2:0.9.5-3 Netscape Portable Runtime Library
ii  libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-0.011006 The GNU stdc++ library
ii  mozilla2:0.9.5-3 Mozilla Web Browser - dummy packag
ii  xlibs  4.1.0-7   X Window System client libraries


---
Received: (at 115987-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jan 2002 21:52:57 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 27 15:52:57 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gtso-c3477b5b.dsl.mediaways.net (mail.frosty-geek.net) 
[195.71.123.91] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16UxEP-0006tD-00; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 15:52:57 -0600
Received: from nautilus.noreply.org (unknown [138.232.34.77])
by mail.frosty-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
id E2E9F46C081; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:52:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: by nautilus.noreply.org (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 6B341357C6; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:52:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: by fisch.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id BABD522BB2; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:52:45 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:52:45 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Package kmozilla removed from Debian unstable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The package kmozilla has been removed from Debian unstable and won't
be released as part of the next Debian release, woody (version 3.0).
I'm therefore closing all its open bugs.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me.

Best regards,

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#126447: marked as done (kmozilla: couple of dependency issues)

2002-01-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:52:45 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package kmozilla removed from Debian unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Dec 2001 21:20:57 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 25 15:20:57 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net (avocet.prod.itd.earthlink.net) 
[207.217.120.50] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16Iz0L-0002ZA-00; Tue, 25 Dec 2001 15:20:57 -0600
Received: from sdn-ar-001casfrmp136.dialsprint.net ([158.252.208.138] 
helo=wheat.dslnorthwest.net)
by avocet.prod.itd.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
id 16Iz0G-00047x-00; Tue, 25 Dec 2001 13:20:53 -0800
Received: from ross by wheat.dslnorthwest.net with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id 16Iz0E-0001ZK-00; Tue, 25 Dec 2001 13:20:50 -0800
From: Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kmozilla: couple of dependency issues
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.36
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.36
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001 13:20:50 -0800
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: kmozilla
Version: N/A; reported 2001-12-25
Severity: wishlist

kmozilla depends on mozilla.  The comments indicate the only part it
embeds is the browser.  Would it be more appropriate to depend on
mozilla-browser?  That way people who don't have all the trimmings
of mozilla (e.g., me) will be able to use it.

Also, I notice there is a python script in the admin subdirectory.
Perhaps a build-depends on some flavor of python is in order.


-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux wheat 2.4.16 #1 Sun Dec 16 22:15:54 PST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


---
Received: (at 126447-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jan 2002 21:52:57 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 27 15:52:57 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gtso-c3477b5b.dsl.mediaways.net (mail.frosty-geek.net) 
[195.71.123.91] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16UxEP-0006tD-00; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 15:52:57 -0600
Received: from nautilus.noreply.org (unknown [138.232.34.77])
by mail.frosty-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
id E2E9F46C081; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:52:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: by nautilus.noreply.org (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 6B341357C6; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:52:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: by fisch.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id BABD522BB2; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:52:45 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:52:45 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Package kmozilla removed from Debian unstable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The package kmozilla has been removed from Debian unstable and won't
be released as part of the next Debian release, woody (version 3.0).
I'm therefore closing all its open bugs.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me.

Best regards,

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#94415: marked as done (Description should be more informative)

2002-01-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:51:12 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Apr 2001 19:46:25 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 18 14:46:25 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vega.services.brown.edu (vega.brown.edu) [128.148.19.202] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14pxuD-0005vp-00; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 14:46:25 -0500
Received: from bootp-202.miller.brown.edu (bootp-202.miller.brown.edu 
[128.148.213.202])
by vega.brown.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA14100;
Wed, 18 Apr 2001 15:46:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from daniel by bootp-202.miller.brown.edu with local (Exim 3.22 #1 
(Debian))
id 14pxuB-nc-00; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 15:46:23 -0400
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 15:46:23 -0400
From: Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Description should be more informative
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.15
Sender: Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: libliteclue1
Version: N/A; reported 2001-04-18
Severity: normal

  The description of this library reads:

Description: "balloon help" Widget library - development
 This is a small library to add "balloon help" to any widget.

  What "widget"?  Are we talking about X windowing system widgets?  I suppose
not, since it doesn't depend on any X libraries.  Is it just some sort of
generalized array of strings?

  Yes, I could install the package and find out for myself, but the
Description field is supposed to make this unnecessary.

  Daniel

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux torrent 2.4.3 #1 Sun Apr 1 17:29:29 EDT 2001 i686

-- 
/ Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---\
|  Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the   |
|  process he does not become a monster.  And when you look   |
|  into an abyss, the abyss also looks into you.  |
|   -- Friedrich Nietzsche|
\--- Listener-supported public radio -- NPR -- http://www.npr.org /

---
Received: (at 94415-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jan 2002 21:51:22 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 27 15:51:22 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gtso-c3477b5b.dsl.mediaways.net (mail.frosty-geek.net) 
[195.71.123.91] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16UxCs-0006pe-00; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 15:51:22 -0600
Received: from nautilus.noreply.org (unknown [138.232.34.77])
by mail.frosty-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B8D46C081
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:51:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: by nautilus.noreply.org (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 3FC73357C6; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:51:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: by fisch.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 7093722BB2; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:51:12 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:51:12 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Package removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This package has been removed from Debian so this wish won't be
granted.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#109369: marked as done (kfilereplace: installing docs in wrong directory)

2002-01-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:52:12 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package removed from Debian unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Aug 2001 16:15:21 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 20 11:15:21 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from hardy.math.okstate.edu [139.78.112.2] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15Yrhw-0007uC-00; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:15:20 -0500
Received: from espresso ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [139.78.115.197])
by hardy.math.okstate.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA17100;
Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:15:19 -0500
Received: from bab by espresso with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
id 15Yrho-Uz-00; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:15:12 -0500
From: Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kfilereplace: installing docs in wrong directory
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.23
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.23
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:15:12 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: kfilereplace
Version: 0.6.1-6
Severity: normal

Hi.  The docs for kfilereplace are being installed beneath
/usr/share/doc/HTML instead of /usr/share/doc/kde/HTML where all KDE
apps should be placing their docs.
 
Perhaps you need a newer version of admin/debianrules (you can get this
from the KDE CVS in the admin module)?
 
Ben.

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux espresso 2.4.8-686 #1 Sun Aug 12 11:18:19 EST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages kfilereplace depends on:
ii  kdelibs3   4:2.2.0-final-1   KDE core libraries (runtime files)
ii  libc6  2.2.4-1   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libjpeg62  6b-1.3The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libkonq3   4:2.2.0-final-2   Core libraries for KDE's file mana
ii  libpng21.0.12-2  PNG library - runtime
ii  libqt2 2:2.3.1-7.0.1 Qt GUI Library (runtime version).
ii  libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-0.010810 The GNU stdc++ library
ii  xlibs  4.1.0-2   X Window System client libraries
ii  zlib1g 1:1.1.3-15compression library - runtime


---
Received: (at 109369-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jan 2002 21:52:24 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 27 15:52:24 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gtso-c3477b5b.dsl.mediaways.net (mail.frosty-geek.net) 
[195.71.123.91] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16UxDr-0006so-00; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 15:52:23 -0600
Received: from nautilus.noreply.org (unknown [138.232.34.77])
by mail.frosty-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D658C46C081
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:52:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: by nautilus.noreply.org (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 32A4A357C6; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:52:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: by fisch.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id F126C22BB2; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:52:12 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:52:12 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Package removed from Debian unstable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This package has been removed from Debian so it's not installing docs
in the wrong place anymore. ;)

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#125355: marked as done (sharc: Spelling error in description)

2002-01-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:50:33 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed from Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2001 23:08:30 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 17 17:08:30 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16G6s2-0003O1-00; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 17:08:30 -0600
Received: from 146-115-121-200.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com 
([146.115.121.200] helo=mizar.alcor.net)
by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #10)
id 16G6s1-00060l-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 18:08:29 -0500
Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id 16G6s1-0002Rt-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 18:08:29 -0500
From: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: sharc: Spelling error in description
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 18:08:29 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: sharc
Severity: minor

This is an automated bug report.

I have recently conducted a mass spelling check of Debian package
descriptions.  In the process, some other errors were also detected,
such as capitalization, word wrap, and indentation problems.

Some notable guidelines that I used in the check include:

- Capitalization

  The names of languages (English, French, etc.) are capitalized in
  English.  Acronyms should be in all capital letters.

- Abbreviation

  In general, words should not be abbreviated as part of the
  description.  Exceptions include standard abbreviations like "etc.".
  This is especially important for proper keyword searches.

- Word joining

  For various reasons, technical terms tend to be artificially joined
  to form new words, like "bugreport".  While this may be acceptable
  in an informal context, such words should be written separately in
  package descriptions, for clarity and to aid in searching.

In some cases where there the spelling check uncovered other errors, I
have made other edits in the diff for purposes of grammar and clarity.

There appear to be one or more errors in the description for this
package.  A unified diff follows at the end of this message.  You
should be able to apply it to your source tree by piping this message
directly into a command line like:

patch /home/me/somewhere/mypackage/debian/control

There is a chance that this may not work if your control has been
modified from the version of your source package in the Debian
archive.  If so, you will have to apply the diff by hand.  When doing
so, please take note if there are multiple corrections on the same
line of the diff.

If you believe this correction to be in error, please contact me
before closing this bug so that we can come to an understanding, and
so that provisions can be made for future spelling checks.

If you are not a native English speaker and would like assistance
improving your description, contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--- orig/sharc  Mon Dec 17 15:52:23 2001
+++ corrected/sharc Mon Dec 17 15:59:04 2001
@@ -9,6 +9,6 @@
  envelope address or his IP address. Relay control lets you decide who
  gets to relay email through your server, based on their IP addresses.
  .
- The package was designed with the needs of large ISP's in mind, but
+ The package was designed with the needs of large ISPs in mind, but
  is small and simple enough for anyone to use.
 

---
Received: (at 125355-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jan 2002 21:50:44 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 27 15:50:43 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gtso-c3477b5b.dsl.mediaways.net (mail.frosty-geek.net) 
[195.71.123.91] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16UxCF-0006m8-00; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 15:50:43 -0600
Received: from nautilus.noreply.org (unknown [138.232.34.77])
by mail.frosty-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E189D46C081
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:50:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: by nautilus.noreply.org (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 6E17D357C6; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:50:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: by fisch.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 6DD8322BB2; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:50:33 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 27 J

Bug#131124: hkgerman copyright

2002-01-27 Thread Daniel Stone
re hkgerman and bug #131124:
It needs a proper bloody license, is what it needs. I can pick several
thousand holes in this license, not least that it's Debian-specific. Can
a German speaker please talk to upstream to try and beat a proper
license out of him? Otherwise, we should think about removing this
package as it violates the DFSG.

-- 
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* bod wonders if elmo does have horns
 bod: hm, according to the account of the only person ever to have 
escaped him
 bod: he has two large black horns
 i thought he had a set of air horns that play god save the queenm
 seeS: yes, mounted on his head and painted black


pgpIrXNeI6trc.pgp
Description: PGP signature