[NEW] The KEY to Get Buyers.
Hey There are many tools online... But NONE of them come close to this… You can attract REAL people to your business with POWERFUL video quotes that inspire and emotionally engage on a human-level. It builds trust with your visitors with credible content associated with your brand, making it a no-brainer to take the action you want – day after day, without spending a dime on advertising. The intersection of these three facts of life is where the secret to getting customers and boosting profits is. Take the shortcut to get there with SociFeed. All the best, Ariel sanders http://onlinereviews.msnd4.com/unsubscribe/26399f17-0020-4589-8ee5-8ed980cd83dd/2670d614-3431-4a83-8674-0846e8646001/ M. Amitle 3, Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 9776, Israel
Re: Can we orphan dlocate?
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 02:18:53PM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > [cc-ing cas] > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 11:45:58PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > >The maintainer appears to have lost interest in the package (last upload > >1999). > >It's also his only package; he is probably MIA. (I seem to remember him > >being > >very angry about Debian's decision to apply the Social Contract and DFSG to > >all > >of Debian, you mean "re-interpret the DFSG and Social Contract in the most bone-headed manner possible". > >and particularly at me for advocating it, so he may have left who? sorry, i barely even recall seeing your (NN's) name before. > >Debian deliberately.) > > I don't think Craig has left debian. :) no, i haven't. i've been a bit pre-occupied with health issues over the last few years. > >Given the various NMUs I suspect that this one would be picked up quite > >quickly, > >but I'm sure nobody wants to step on the maintainer's toes > > > >Given the presence of bugs as old as seven years, it clearly needs a new > >maintainer. i have plans for dlocate, and if all goes well with my transplant op i should be in a position to re-package my local version in June. craig -- craig sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Campus crusade for Cthulhu -- it found me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFC: Changing the NM system
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 07:29:30PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > I want to suggest to change the way NM works. > > Currently, someone applies at [1] and if he's lucky he has his account > less than 2 months after he applied. what real benefit is there in erecting even more barriers-to-entry for prospective debian developers? we've gone down this path before and it resulted in everyone being pissed off for a year or so because no new maintainers were being accepted, and then finally we came up with the present NM procedures. they're far from perfect (overly bureacratic, IMO) but they basically work. now, less than a year after NM was re-opened there are proposals which will effectively close it down again. why? what actual good will that do? adding even more barriers just makes one of debian's major benefits a ridiculous mockery: "if you don't like the way something works, you can join the project and fix it". that may (or may not) currently be one of our touted benefits, but it has always been one of debian's strengths - the fact that the debian project itself is truly "open source". > -- > A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a > "Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble. > -- Mahatma Ghandi > what an appropriate .signature. i'll have to say No to this proposal. craig -- craig sanders
Bug#83227: realplayer8 installer provides no way of cancelling
Package: realplayer Version: 8.0 just did an "apt-get dselect-upgrade". one of the packages to be upgraded was realplayer. it's debconf template told me where to get realplayer 8 from, but provided no way of saying "bugger that for a joke, i'll download it later when i have time". this stalled the download until i gave in and just downloaded the damn thing, once again having to give a dummy email address to those spammers at Real Networks. i'll remember to put the damn package on hold this time. i rarely use it anyway. craig -- craig sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG Key: 1024D/CD5626F0 Key fingerprint: 9674 7EE2 4AC6 F5EF 3C57 52C3 EC32 6810 CD56 26F0
Re: Unconditional prompting from dotfile packages
On Thu, Apr 22, 1999 at 11:11:27AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > What do you actually mean by unconditionally prompting - the > message for bytecompilation? What do you propose, to automatically > bytecompile? is there any good reason not to do that? or at least queue the job for execution when dpkg has exited (similar to what menu does). craig -- craig sanders
