Adopting packages.

2002-01-27 Thread David B Harris
Hey ho :) I'm currently in the NM queue, waiting for my key to be
signed. It'll be a while, I believe, before I get it signed. It just
happens to be that I've moved to within a stone's throw of where my AM
works, though it's still across a border. :)

Anyways, I was wondering what the QA group thinks about people
maintaining packages who arn't capable of uploading on their own.

I'm a bit leery about it, to be frank, but I would do well at
maintaining at least of of Adrian's Bunk packages.

--
 .--=-=-=-=--=---=-=-=.
/David Barclay HarrisAut agere, aut mori.  \
\Clan Barclay  Either action, or death./
 `---==-=-=-=-===-=---=--='



Re: Adopting packages.

2002-01-27 Thread David B Harris
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002 18:02:20 +
Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is what sponsorship is - it's become fairly normal.

Really. Nuts. So it's normal? Still doesn't seem like a particularily
good idea.

-- 
 .--=-=-=-=--=---=-=-=.
/David Barclay HarrisAut agere, aut mori.  \
\Clan Barclay  Either action, or death./
 `---==-=-=-=-===-=---=--='



Re: Adopting packages.

2002-01-27 Thread David B Harris
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002 15:39:35 -0600
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think people should view it as a long-term solution, but with
> a good sponsor it's fine in the short term. It also helps with the
> new-maintainer process, since you can demonstrate that you're
> competent at handling bugs and so on before your account is created.

Thanks for the reply :)

So I take it the best way to go about it is arrange with somebody to be
a regular sponsor for me?

*cough* any volounteers? *cough* ;)

-- 
 .--=-=-=-=--=---=-=-=.
/David Barclay HarrisAut agere, aut mori.  \
\Clan Barclay  Either action, or death./
 `---==-=-=-=-===-=---=--='



Re: Bugs by severity

2002-02-16 Thread David B Harris
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002 22:42:30 -0600
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I find it handy when deciding what to work on, as (a) there's a
> different mindset involved when fixing critical/grave bugs than when
> fixing serious bugs, and (b) it's ordered by bug number while the
> usual lists are ordered by package name. It uses doogie's new realtime
> index databases, so it should be very fast.

I apologise if the answer to my question is obvious to most; I'm new to
the QA group, and a relatively new DD to boot.

Are these reports for *all* packages in Debian? Looks like it, just want
to be sure.

Thanks :)

-- 
 .--=-=-=-=--=---=-=-=.
/David Barclay HarrisAut agere, aut mori.  \
\Clan Barclay  Either action, or death./
 `---==-=-=-=-===-=---=--='


pgpTAfwe94k9a.pgp
Description: PGP signature