Re: DPT and UDD regarding d/watch file failure
On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 11:35:13PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > I don't know where tracker.debian.org gets its data about upstream > status (and errors). I thought it was using UDD, but apparently it > isn't. It is: https://salsa.debian.org/qa/distro-tracker/-/blob/master/distro_tracker/vendor/debian/tracker_tasks.py?ref_type=heads#L1402 don't know if there is any import error ongoing, though. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: DPT and UDD regarding d/watch file failure
On Tue, 23 Jul 2024, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 11:35:13PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > I don't know where tracker.debian.org gets its data about upstream > > status (and errors). I thought it was using UDD, but apparently it > > isn't. > > It is: > https://salsa.debian.org/qa/distro-tracker/-/blob/master/distro_tracker/vendor/debian/tracker_tasks.py?ref_type=heads#L1402 > > don't know if there is any import error ongoing, though. I have no sign of error in the import process right now. But https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/xorgxrdp now shows info about new upstream release 0.10.1 so the problem (if any) is no longer visible. Cheers, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Raphaël Hertzog ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋The Debian Handbook: https://debian-handbook.info/get/ ⠈⠳⣄ Debian Long Term Support: https://deb.li/LTS signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: DPT and UDD regarding d/watch file failure
Hi, xorgxrdp at Salsa is still on the previous version and using a clone here is what I am getting: $ git clone https://salsa.debian.org/debian-remote-team/xorgxrdp.git $ cd xorgxrdp $ uscan uscan warn: In debian/watch no matching files for watch line https://github.com/neutrinolabs/xorgxrdp/releases .*/xorgxrdp(?:[-_]?v?(\d[\-+\.:\~\da-zA-Z]*))(?i)(?:\.(?:tar\.xz|tar\.bz2|tar\.gz|tar\.zstd?|zip|tgz|tbz|txz)) so I think that DPT was right, isn't it? Le mar. 23 juil. 2024 à 10:31, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : > > On Tue, 23 Jul 2024, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 11:35:13PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > I don't know where tracker.debian.org gets its data about upstream > > > status (and errors). I thought it was using UDD, but apparently it > > > isn't. > > > > It is: > > https://salsa.debian.org/qa/distro-tracker/-/blob/master/distro_tracker/vendor/debian/tracker_tasks.py?ref_type=heads#L1402 > > > > don't know if there is any import error ongoing, though. > > I have no sign of error in the import process right now. > But https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/xorgxrdp now shows info about new > upstream release 0.10.1 so the problem (if any) is no longer visible. > > Cheers, > -- > ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Raphaël Hertzog > ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ > ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋The Debian Handbook: https://debian-handbook.info/get/ > ⠈⠳⣄ Debian Long Term Support: https://deb.li/LTS
Bug#1076797: DDPO: VCS column marked as failed unexpectedly
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, On my DDPO page [1] there are some packages for which the VCS column shows "failed" however, the "debian/latest" branch in itself didn't fail but the pipeline failure is on another branch "ubuntu/focal" for instance. In the pipeline list of salsa, it is even not the latest job that failed which could have explained that, but the one on ubuntu/focal. Moreover, if I delete the failing pipeline from salsa (this is the case for php-datto-json-rpc), it is still marked as "failed" (I deleted the job yesterday and today DDPO still shows it as "failed"). Packages are: php-datto-json-rpc php-datto-json-rpc-http php-giggsey-libphonenumber I would have expected the failure statut be the one of the branch that holds the debian tree (eg. main, master, debian/latest...) or as an alternative the branch marked as "default" in salsa. [1] https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?email=fabstz...@yahoo.fr Regards
Re: DPT and UDD regarding d/watch file failure
Hi Patrice, xorgxrdp at Salsa is still on the previous version and using a clone here is what I am getting: $ git clone https://salsa.debian.org/debian-remote-team/xorgxrdp.git $ cd xorgxrdp $ uscan uscan warn: In debian/watch no matching files for watch line https://github.com/neutrinolabs/xorgxrdp/releases .*/xorgxrdp(?:[-_]?v?(\d[\-+\.:\~\da-zA-Z]*))(?i)(?:\.(?:tar\.xz|tar\.bz2|tar\.gz|tar\.zstd?|zip|tgz|tbz|txz)) Indeed it took me a while to get the salsa repos updated for xorgxrdp and xrdp. That's done now. Best, Alex so I think that DPT was right, isn't it? Le mar. 23 juil. 2024 à 10:31, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : On Tue, 23 Jul 2024, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 11:35:13PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > I don't know where tracker.debian.org gets its data about upstream > > status (and errors). I thought it was using UDD, but apparently it > > isn't. > > It is: > https://salsa.debian.org/qa/distro-tracker/-/blob/master/distro_tracker/vendor/debian/tracker_tasks.py?ref_type=heads#L1402 > > don't know if there is any import error ongoing, though. I have no sign of error in the import process right now. But https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/xorgxrdp now shows info about new upstream release 0.10.1 so the problem (if any) is no longer visible. Cheers, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Raphaël Hertzog ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋The Debian Handbook: https://debian-handbook.info/get/ ⠈⠳⣄ Debian Long Term Support: https://deb.li/LTS
