Bug#1052146: UDD: broken data from bugs-binpkgs-pts CGI script

2023-09-18 Thread Paul Wise
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd

The UDD list of BTS binary packages for the PTS started outputting some
incorrect package names. I am not sure if these are caused by bad data
in the BTS itself or if something has broken in the UDD database.

   $ curl -sL https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugs-binpkgs-pts.cgi | grep -vP 
'^(?:src:)?[-a-z0-9.+]+ [0-9]+ [0-9]+ [0-9]+ [0-9]+ [0-9]+$' 
   115.2.0esr-1 severity: 0 1 0 0 0
   critical update 0 1 0 0 0
   firefox-esr  version: 0 1 0 0 0
   ng/dl.   debian 0 1 0 0 0
   trixie's 0 1 0 0 0

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#1052146: UDD: broken data from bugs-binpkgs-pts CGI script

2023-09-18 Thread Stuart Prescott




On 18/09/2023 17:30, Paul Wise wrote:

$ curl -sL https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugs-binpkgs-pts.cgi | grep -vP 
'^(?:src:)?[-a-z0-9.+]+ [0-9]+ [0-9]+ [0-9]+ [0-9]+ [0-9]+$'
115.2.0esr-1severity: 0 1 0 0 0
criticalupdate 0 1 0 0 0
firefox-esr version: 0 1 0 0 0
ng/dl.  debian 0 1 0 0 0
trixie's 0 1 0 0 0



I don't think the BTS or UDD are broken here, I think that's just 
#1052073 which has some very interesting metadata that might take some 
time to clean up...



--
Stuart Prescott   http://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu...@nanonanonano.net
Debian Developer  http://www.debian.org/   stu...@debian.org
GPG fingerprint   90E2 D2C1 AD14 6A1B 7EBB 891D BBC1 7EBB 1396 F2F7



Bug#1052146: marked as done (UDD: broken data from bugs-binpkgs-pts CGI script)

2023-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2023 20:57:54 +0800
with message-id <574179004a4f68c5b39200538b321fc1cb44cda3.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1052146: UDD: broken data from bugs-binpkgs-pts CGI 
script
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052146,
regarding UDD: broken data from bugs-binpkgs-pts CGI script
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1052146: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1052146
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd

The UDD list of BTS binary packages for the PTS started outputting some
incorrect package names. I am not sure if these are caused by bad data
in the BTS itself or if something has broken in the UDD database.

   $ curl -sL https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugs-binpkgs-pts.cgi | grep -vP 
'^(?:src:)?[-a-z0-9.+]+ [0-9]+ [0-9]+ [0-9]+ [0-9]+ [0-9]+$' 
   115.2.0esr-1 severity: 0 1 0 0 0
   critical update 0 1 0 0 0
   firefox-esr  version: 0 1 0 0 0
   ng/dl.   debian 0 1 0 0 0
   trixie's 0 1 0 0 0

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 18:04:14 +1000 Stuart Prescott wrote:

> I don't think the BTS or UDD are broken here, I think that's just 
> #1052073 which has some very interesting metadata that might take some 
> time to clean up...

Thanks for the pointer. Fixed #1052073 with some BTS control commands.

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---


Bug#1004256: Does this apoly to me

2023-09-18 Thread Renee Brutcher
Adafruit CircuitPython
latest

API AND USAGE

Core Modules
Standard Libraries
Supported Ports
Troubleshooting
Adafruit CircuitPython Libraries
CircuitPython Library Bundles
Workflows
Environment Variables
DESIGN AND PORTING REFERENCE

Design Guide
Architecture
Porting
Adding *io support to other ports
MicroPython .mpy files
Glossary
ABOUT THE PROJECT

CircuitPython
Contributing
Building CircuitPython
Building
Testing
Debugging
Code Quality Checks
Adafruit Community Code of Conduct
MicroPython & CircuitPython License
WebUSB Serial Support
MicroPython & CircuitPython License
MicroPython & CircuitPython License¶
MIT License

Copyright (c) 2013-2022 Damien P. George and others

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of 
this software and associated documentation files (the “Software”), to deal in 
the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to 
use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies 
of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do 
so, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all 
copies or substantial portions of the Software.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED “AS IS”, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR 
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, 
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE 
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER 
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, 
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE 
SOFTWARE.

PreviousNext
© Copyright 2014-2023, MicroPython & CircuitPython contributors 
(https://github.com/adafruit/circuitpython/graphs/contributors). Revision 
86990e93. Last updated on 15 Sep 2023.

Built with Sphinx using a theme provided by Read the Docs.
Read the Docsv: latest




Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Note9, an AT&T 5G Evolution capable smartphone