Re: debci configuration is inconsistent, disrupts package migration
Hi, moving this to debian...@lists.debian.org. debian-qa is of no help here. Thanks. On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, Drew Parsons wrote: > The configuration of ci.debian.org is not consistent. A failing test > of deal.ii is marked on > https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/deal.ii/testing/amd64/ > as triggered by petsc/3.9.3+dfsg1-2, but the test log shows that in > fact libpetsc-real3.8-dev is used for the test > (i.e. petsc/3.8.4+dfsg1-2+b2). So unsurprisingly the test fails, which > disrupts migration of the new petsc 3.9 (throwing it out to 10 days > instead of 5). The failure itself occurs since the different petsc were > built against different openmpi. > > Drew > > -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support Debian LTS: https://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html Learn to master Debian: https://debian-handbook.info/get/
Re: debci configuration is inconsistent, disrupts package migration
Hi Drew > On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, Drew Parsons wrote: >> The configuration of ci.debian.org is not consistent. A failing test >> of deal.ii is marked on >> https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/deal.ii/testing/amd64/ >> as triggered by petsc/3.9.3+dfsg1-2, but the test log shows that in >> fact libpetsc-real3.8-dev is used for the test >> (i.e. petsc/3.8.4+dfsg1-2+b2). So unsurprisingly the test fails, which >> disrupts migration of the new petsc 3.9 (throwing it out to 10 days >> instead of 5). The failure itself occurs since the different petsc were >> built against different openmpi. >From the times in the logs, it appears that the test was run before deal.ii's binNMU happened [1]. So the delay is only temporary. As soon as the test is successful, the migration delay will disappear. I've requested a retry for that test, so it should happen soon. Regards Graham [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=deal.ii&suite=unstable
