rng-tools5 vs rng-tools

2018-05-10 Thread Laurent Bigonville

Hello,

Debian seems to contains to version of rng-tool packaged in two 
different src package (rng-tool, last upload in 2011 and rng-tool5, last 
upload yesterday).


This might be confusing for our users.

Shouldn't rng-tools package be removed and/or rng-tools5 renamed to 
rng-tools? Any reason to keep that old version in debian?


If that matters, ubuntu is shipping version 5 of rng-tools in the 
rng-tool package.


Kind regards,

Laurent Bigonville



Re: rng-tools5 vs rng-tools

2018-05-10 Thread Michael Stone

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:24:35AM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
Debian seems to contains to version of rng-tool packaged in two 
different src package (rng-tool, last upload in 2011 and rng-tool5, 
last upload yesterday).


This might be confusing for our users.

Shouldn't rng-tools package be removed and/or rng-tools5 renamed to 
rng-tools? Any reason to keep that old version in debian?


rng-tools5 doesn't support everything that's in rng-tools, so it isn't a 
direct replacement. The command line syntax changed, so existing 
configurations won't work. It would have been better if upstream had 
picked a different name for the new program, but without a time machine 
I can't fix that. :) As a practical matter, I would expect that the 
hardware supported only by the original package will eventually be 
obsolete to the point that debian won't run on it, at which point the 
distinction becomes moot. In theory someone could write a preinst that 
would check to see whether the current configuration is compatible, then 
set rng-tools5 to replace rng-tools but abort if it won't work--but as a 
practical matter, I would expect a large proportion of working rng-tools 
configurations to break trying to move them to rng-tools5, and for those 
that do work I wouldn't expect any benefits.


Yes, it's confusing, but I've tried to add keywords to the description 
to suggest that rng-tools5 is the one you want for newer hardware. 
(RDRAND/RDSEED)


Mike Stone



Bug#891504: marked as done (tracker.debian.org: emails sent to 'team+slug@tracker.d.o' are discarded)

2018-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 May 2018 21:15:46 +
with message-id <5af4b682cdfa0_3292afedc95b0cc12...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug #891504 in tracker.debian.org fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #891504,
regarding tracker.debian.org: emails sent to 'team+slug@tracker.d.o' are 
discarded
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
891504: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=891504
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: tracker.debian.org

Currently all non-automated emails (i.e. those that are not anyway
already catched by tracker through other means) sent to
team+@tracker.debian.org are just discarded instead of being
relayed to all team members (imho they should go into the 'contact'
keyword).



Filing this well known missing feature as a bug so I can point people
to it.

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,

Bug #891504 in tracker.debian.org reported by you has been fixed in the Git 
repository.
You can see the commit message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/qa/distro-tracker/commit/a707768aec9af00095548da39d7a4050d3ae5627


mail: implement forward to team members for team+foo@ emails

The process discards all mails which can be associated to a package
as those are automatic emails that we already receive through
dispatch@. The remaining mails are forwarded to team members with
the "contact" keyword. The headers X-Distro-Tracker-Team and
X-Distro-Tracker-Keyword are set appropriately.

Closes: #891504



(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/891504--- End Message ---