Re: mass-removing packages that missed both jessie and stretch?
Hi, On 19/07/17 at 23:29 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > So, I propose that we remove from the archive all packages that: > were in unstable at the time of the jessie freeze > AND > were not in jessie at the time of the release > AND > where in unstable at the time of the stretch freeze > AND > where not in stretch at the time of the release > AND > are still not in testing > AND > were not uploaded over the last 6 months FTR, I've just filed bugs on 90 packages following that process. See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=qa-removals-post-stretch;users=debian-qa@lists.debian.org Lucas
Re: Bug#842829: UDD/uscan: devscripts needs to be upgraded to avoid some failures
On 29/05/17 at 08:12 -0400, James McCoy wrote: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 03:09:55PM -0400, James McCoy wrote: > > On Nov 1, 2016 11:33, "Lucas Nussbaum" wrote: > > > I tried with the first package listed. It works fine with devscripts > > > 2.16.8 (in testing), but not with 2.16.4~bpo8+1 (in stable-bpo, and > > > installed on ullmann.debian.org). > > > > > > To fix that, an update of that backport is needed. > > > > I've yet to do that because it would require a backport of the licensecheck > > package, too, since that was split out of devscripts. > > Thanks to fsfs backporting licensecheck, I've updated devscripts' > backport to 2.17.5~bpo8+1. Thanks! As a result, the uscan output is now fine for the packages that had issues previously, so I'm closing this bug. https://udd.debian.org/dmd/?email1=&email2=&email3=&packages=fonts-kanjistrokeorders+fonts-ricty-diminished+gawk-doc&ignpackages=&format=html#todo Lucas
Bug#844106: qa.debian.org: Says uscan failed, however, it works (for linuxinfo)
Hi Helge, On 12/11/16 at 15:48 +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: normal > > https://packages.qa.debian.org/l/linuxinfo.html I'm not sure where the old PTS gets its uscan information, but: - it's OK on tracker.debian.org - it's also OK on UDD's DMD: https://udd.debian.org/dmd/?linuxinfo I've updated the usertags to reflect that it's a PTS bug, not a UDD bug. Lucas
Bug#842829: marked as done (UDD/uscan: devscripts needs to be upgraded to avoid some failures)
Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2017 10:56:37 -0400 with message-id <20170806145637.ep6c76c3hbvvg...@xanadu.blop.info> and subject line Re: Bug#842829: UDD/uscan: devscripts needs to be upgraded to avoid some failures has caused the Debian Bug report #842829, regarding UDD/uscan: devscripts needs to be upgraded to avoid some failures to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 842829: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842829 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: udd Hi, (filing as a bug) On 01/10/16 at 13:21 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > Hi (I'm not on this list, so CC to me please), > > Those 3 packages got uscan error in Maintainer Dashboard page > > > > fonts-kanjistrokeorders debian/watch: uscan returned an error: In > > debian/watch no matching files for watch line http://www.nihilist.org.uk/ > > http://www.nihilist.org.uk/KanjiStrokeOrders_v[-_](\d[\-+\.:\~\da-zA-Z]*)(?i)\.(?:tar\.xz|tar\.bz2|tar\.gz|zip)\?attredirects=0 > > debian uupdate > > > > fonts-ricty-diminished debian/watch: uscan returned an error: In > > debian/watch no matching files for watch line > > http://www.rs.tus.ac.jp/yyusa/ricty_diminished.html > > ricty_diminished/ricty_diminished-[-_](\d[\-+\.:\~\da-zA-Z]*)(?i)\.(?:tar\.xz|tar\.bz2|tar\.gz|zip) > > > > gawk-docdebian/watch: uscan returned an error: > > > However, it works fine on my box. I guess it may be caused by use version 4 > syntax for debian/watch file. > > > $ uscan --verbose > > (snip) > > uscan info: Matching target for downloadurlmangle: > > https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gawk/gawk-4.1.4.tar.xz > > uscan info: Upstream URL (downloadurlmangled): > >https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gawk/gawk-4.1.4.tar.xz > > uscan info: Newest upstream tarball version selected for download > > (uversionmangled): 4.1.4 > > uscan info: Download filename (filenamemangled): gawk-4.1.4.tar.xz > > uscan info: Newest version of gawk-doc on remote site is 4.1.4, local > > version is 4.1.4 > > uscan info:=> Package is up to date for from > > https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gawk/gawk-4.1.4.tar.xz > > uscan info: Scan finished > > Can anyone can look into it, please? I tried with the first package listed. It works fine with devscripts 2.16.8 (in testing), but not with 2.16.4~bpo8+1 (in stable-bpo, and installed on ullmann.debian.org). To fix that, an update of that backport is needed. Lucas --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 29/05/17 at 08:12 -0400, James McCoy wrote: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 03:09:55PM -0400, James McCoy wrote: > > On Nov 1, 2016 11:33, "Lucas Nussbaum" wrote: > > > I tried with the first package listed. It works fine with devscripts > > > 2.16.8 (in testing), but not with 2.16.4~bpo8+1 (in stable-bpo, and > > > installed on ullmann.debian.org). > > > > > > To fix that, an update of that backport is needed. > > > > I've yet to do that because it would require a backport of the licensecheck > > package, too, since that was split out of devscripts. > > Thanks to fsfs backporting licensecheck, I've updated devscripts' > backport to 2.17.5~bpo8+1. Thanks! As a result, the uscan output is now fine for the packages that had issues previously, so I'm closing this bug. https://udd.debian.org/dmd/?email1=&email2=&email3=&packages=fonts-kanjistrokeorders+fonts-ricty-diminished+gawk-doc&ignpackages=&format=html#todo Lucas--- End Message ---
Bug#854200: udd: useless tag before backports version numbers
Hi, On 05/02/17 at 01:13 +0100, Raphaël Halimi wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: minor > User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: udd > > Hi, > > The lines which display version numbers for backports have twice the > height of other lines. Looking at the source code for the HTML page, I > could see that those version numbers have a tag just before them. > > You can see that on my dashboard for example: > > https://udd.debian.org/dmd/?raphael.halimi%40gmail.com#todo Fixed in 68c6615e562dbdfb567d45e8b9c213915b08290c Thanks for reporting! Lucas
Bug#863592: marked as done (UDD should use https for links)
Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2017 12:26:27 -0400 with message-id <20170806162627.kqpgphmtzobc6...@xanadu.blop.info> and subject line Re: Bug#863592: UDD should use https for links has caused the Debian Bug report #863592, regarding UDD should use https for links to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 863592: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=863592 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: qa.debian.org Severity: minor User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: udd I noticed that the links to the bugs from UDD bugs searches are http and not https. >From a quick grep through the sources there seem to be more places where https could be used instead of http. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, On 29/05/17 at 01:20 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: minor > User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: udd > > I noticed that the links to the bugs from UDD bugs searches are > http and not https. > > From a quick grep through the sources there seem to be more > places where https could be used instead of http. Fixed in ded1cb32ac524295312d54406386693227f6e397 Lucas--- End Message ---
Bug#854200: marked as done (udd: useless tag before backports version numbers)
Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2017 13:10:54 -0400 with message-id <20170806171054.wytoaewtyczqs...@xanadu.blop.info> and subject line Re: Bug#854200: udd: useless tag before backports version numbers has caused the Debian Bug report #854200, regarding udd: useless tag before backports version numbers to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 854200: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854200 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: qa.debian.org Severity: minor User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: udd Hi, The lines which display version numbers for backports have twice the height of other lines. Looking at the source code for the HTML page, I could see that those version numbers have a tag just before them. You can see that on my dashboard for example: https://udd.debian.org/dmd/?raphael.halimi%40gmail.com#todo Regards, -- Raphaël Halimi signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- really closing now--- End Message ---
Bug#871021: jadetex: transitional package since stretch and containing stuff
Package: jadetex Version: 3.13-17 Severity: normal Hi, jadetex package description says it's a transitional package (in stretch and upwards), yet it still contains stuff and not mere meta data. I guess the proper cause of action would be to remove the package from sid. -- cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: Digital signature
