Bug#685605: marked as done (qa.debian.org: Would be great if the PTS could provide RDF descriptions of packages)

2015-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:45:19 +
with message-id <2015124519.ga12...@shiftout.net>
and subject line Re: qa.debian.org: Would be great if the PTS could provide RDF 
descriptions of packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #685605,
regarding qa.debian.org: Would be great if the PTS could provide RDF 
descriptions of packages
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
685605: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685605
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

Hi.

There exist a few specification addressing the need of standardization of RDF 
descriptions for Software Packages, like SPDX [0] or ADMS.SW [1].

I guess it would be great if the PTS could export on the Linked Open Data graph 
/ Semantic Web, descriptions of the Debian packages, using RDF, with the 
aforementioned standards.

This would enable future discovery of links between projects, packages, 
releases and such by machines exploiting such self descriptive documents.

A classical form of such publishing could be achieved through content 
negociations of URLs of the PTS in order to access RDF+XML or JSON 
representations instead of HTML ones.

At least for consuming / GET access, this would provide an alternative to the 
SOAP interface.

A variant could be to embed RDFa inside the HTML, as previously proposed in 
#585740

Hope this helps.

Best regards,

[0] http://spdx.org
[1] https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/adms_foss/description

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:24:59PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> So what's the relationship of rdf.debian.net and tracker.debian.org?

For applications where the data is available in UDD, this will be presented
via rdf.debian.net (soon to become meta.debian.org once the namespaces are
stable and the code is stable).

For applications where the data is not in UDD, applications can still
publish their own RDF and meta.debian.org would provide permanent URLs from
a managed namespace if desired.

> Do you want to add link from the tracker to rdf.debian.net?

Yes, but not yet. There would be a  in the head
section and a link as there is currently on packages.qa.d.o in my plan.

> Or shall this bug be closed assuming that the RDF export is now
> handled by rdf.debian.net and doesn't have to be implemented
> in tracker.debian.org any longer?

This bug can be closed as it's not really a bug on tracker.debian.org.

Thanks,
Iain.

-- --- End Message ---


Please update Merge-o-matic to mail the new tracker.debian.org

2015-12-11 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello,

as announced in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/12/msg1.html
Merge-o-Matic should now send its mail to @tracker.debian.org.

Ideally you send your mails to dispa...@tracker.debian.org and you
insert those two fields:

  X-Distro-Tracker-Package: 
  X-Distro-Tracker-Keyword: derivatives

Thank you!
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Writer/Consultant ◈ Debian Developer

Discover the Debian Administrator's Handbook:
→ http://debian-handbook.info/get/



Re: Please update Merge-o-matic to mail the new tracker.debian.org

2015-12-11 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Just for the record, m...@ubuntu.com currently bounces and I don't know
who to contact on the Ubuntu side. I pinged a few persons on IRC in the
mean time, maybe someone will know.

Cheers,

On Fri, 11 Dec 2015, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> as announced in
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/12/msg1.html
> Merge-o-Matic should now send its mail to @tracker.debian.org.
> 
> Ideally you send your mails to dispa...@tracker.debian.org and you
> insert those two fields:
> 
>   X-Distro-Tracker-Package: 
>   X-Distro-Tracker-Keyword: derivatives
> 
> Thank you!
> -- 
> Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Writer/Consultant ◈ Debian Developer
> 
> Discover the Debian Administrator's Handbook:
> → http://debian-handbook.info/get/
> 

-- 
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html
Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/



Re: Please update Merge-o-matic to mail the new tracker.debian.org

2015-12-11 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 04:29:50PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Just for the record, m...@ubuntu.com currently bounces and I don't know
> who to contact on the Ubuntu side. I pinged a few persons on IRC in the
> mean time, maybe someone will know.

I'd file a bug here https://launchpad.net/merge-o-matic
Also looking at that project I'd say the most active/involved person
currently is bdmurray.

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  http://mapreri.org  : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Processed: retitle 784226 to tracker.debian.org and ftp-master.debian.org both extract files from source packages

2015-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> retitle 784226 tracker.debian.org and ftp-master.debian.org both extract 
> files from source packages
Bug #784226 [tracker.debian.org] tracker.debian.org: Don't duplicate work
Changed Bug title to 'tracker.debian.org and ftp-master.debian.org both extract 
files from source packages' from 'tracker.debian.org: Don't duplicate work'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
784226: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784226
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: retitle 784226 to tracker.debian.org and ftp-master.debian.org both extract files from source packages ...

2015-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> retitle 784226 tracker.debian.org and ftp-master.debian.org both extract 
> files from source packages
Bug #784226 [tracker.debian.org] tracker.debian.org and ftp-master.debian.org 
both extract files from source packages
Ignoring request to change the title of bug#784226 to the same title
> tags 784226 + wontfix
Bug #784226 [tracker.debian.org] tracker.debian.org and ftp-master.debian.org 
both extract files from source packages
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
784226: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784226
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#788074: marked as done (Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender)

2015-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 11 Dec 2015 21:48:57 +0100
with message-id <20151211204857.ga21...@home.ouaza.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#788074: Mail delivery failed: returning message to 
sender
has caused the Debian Bug report #788074,
regarding Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
788074: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788074
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: normal

The ‘tracker.debian.org’ email system is evidently handling message
transport for, at least,  incoming email.
I think bug#754913 is the relevant request for that.

The transport is reportedtly failing, as I have received a whole lot
of bounce messages in response to an attempt several days ago to send
a message to numerous package maintainers. An example is attached to
this message.

But I have also received (some) automated responses indicating the
messages were delivered to maintainer end-point email addresses.

Is ‘tracker.debian.org’ currently duplicating the handling of incoming
? If so, it should resolve the duplication
and ensure only one system is doing it, correctly.

Attempting to respond to Mailer-Daemon, I have also received an error
from an unroutable internal domain; the undeliverable mail message is
also attached to this message. That is poor net behaviour; the sender
email address should be able to receive replies.

-- 
 \  “The best way to get information on Usenet is not to ask a |
  `\   question, but to post the wrong information.” —Aahz |
_o__)  |
Ben Finney 
--- Begin Message ---
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

  cloudprint_cont...@tracker.debian.org
all hosts have been failing for a long time and were last tried after this 
message arrived

-- This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. --

Return-path: 
Received: from quantz.debian.org ([2001:41c8:1000:21::21:28])
from C=NA,ST=NA,L=Ankh Morpork,O=Debian SMTP,OU=Debian SMTP 
CA,CN=quantz.debian.org,EMAIL=hostmas...@quantz.debian.org (verified)
by muffat.debian.org with esmtps 
(TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.84)
(envelope-from )
id 1Z0gex-00026k-JK
for cloudprint_cont...@tracker.debian.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 01:42:59 
+
Received: from qa by quantz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.84)
(envelope-from )
id 1Z0gew-000395-4K
for cloudprint_cont...@tracker.debian.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 01:42:58 
+
Received: from picconi.debian.org ([2001:41c8:1000:21::21:3])
from C=NA,ST=NA,L=Ankh Morpork,O=Debian SMTP,OU=Debian SMTP 
CA,CN=picconi.debian.org,EMAIL=hostmas...@picconi.debian.org (verified)
by quantz.debian.org with esmtps 
(TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.84)
(envelope-from )
id 1Z0gew-00038w-13
for cloudprint_cont...@packages.qa.debian.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 
01:42:58 +
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28])
by picconi.debian.org with esmtps 
(TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.84)
(envelope-from )
id 1Z0gev-0001Qq-3N
for cloudpr...@packages.debian.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 01:42:57 +
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44])
by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255DF2193B
for ; Thu,  4 Jun 2015 21:42:44 -0400 
(EDT)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160])
  by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 04 Jun 2015 21:42:45 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id
:mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=nt
7Bu/Q7PucbGl8m4mydaoDizUE=; b=lgtQxbk2hmhRKxWWP/ihiFaB2m1Enw+5Kn
8Wl+G6emaXHTtTKneai/9z1zPhGQ4vcPnMLGKz8H4E81AJfasfidTbr+kfgY1jfJ
25D/hmHLbXPpXw8WVGE4mNoQlQVjMcsSLAWE7REhqSXIAE+lyAiOtT+hv04p6TA9
aMcccB6BE=
X-Sasl-enc: x0rxGTXl51RM5pd80tk+mXN9QS7xt7UdMQ4GXcOW8j39 1433468564
Received: from localhost (unknown [118.209.49.184])
by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 19DB0C0001E;
Thu,  4 Jun 2015 21:42:43 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 11:42:41 +1000
From: Ben Finney 
To: bcfg2-ser...@packages

Bug#788835: marked as done (tracker.debian.org: Display of CVE links in changes files includes invalid markup)

2015-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 11 Dec 2015 22:23:28 +0100
with message-id <20151211212328.ga28...@home.ouaza.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#788835: tracker.debian.org: Display of CVE links in 
changes files includes invalid markup
has caused the Debian Bug report #788835,
regarding tracker.debian.org: Display of CVE links in changes files includes 
invalid markup
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
788835: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788835
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hi!

The rendering of CVE items in the changelog section of the changes files
includes invalid HTML markup. As an example:

   https://tracker.debian.org/news/584136

which includes

   konversation (1.5-2) unstable; urgency=medium
   .
 * Backport fix for CVE-2014-8483 in cve-2014-8483.patch
   See 
CVE-2014-8483">https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2014-8483
   (Closes: #768191)

(with the CVE duplicated and the "> visible in the browser).

cheers
Stuart
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Duh, the maintainer included the link
> "https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2014-8483"; in the
> changelog and that text link is transformed into a real link
> twice, once for the full link and once for the string "CVE-2014-8483".
> 
> And obviously a link embedded in another link doesn't give the expected
> result..

Fixed this by further restricting the way we match CVE numbers. We now
require a space before the CVE number.

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html
Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/--- End Message ---