Bug#253973: marked as done (PTS: could send emails about testing migration)
Your message dated Wed, 4 Jan 2012 08:51:14 +0100 with message-id <20120104075114.ga7...@rivendell.home.ouaza.com> and subject line Re: Bug#253973: Bug #253973: PTS: could send emails about testing migration has caused the Debian Bug report #253973, regarding PTS: could send emails about testing migration to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 253973: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=253973 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist Each package for each distribution should have a notification list. Notification of new package/version. For example, I would like to know when another version of mono enters testing: http://packages.debian.org/testing/interpreters/mono So somewhere on that page would be a form to enter my email address. The changes list could be a cut down version of mailman. Or just a simple opt-in list. That prompt's subsribers of a new version. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > For history, the 'news' section seems like best suited, so the question > remains[1], would it be a waste of space or rather a good use of space > to have testings status changes end up in that section too? It's been a few years now that we have testing migrations/removals in the news section of the PTS. Closing the bug. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Pre-order a copy of the Debian Administrator's Handbook and help liberate it: http://debian-handbook.info/liberation/ --- End Message ---
Bug#647258: qa.debian.org: the PTS should put a TODO for release goal bugs affecting the package
Hi, On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Thanks to Niels Thykier we now have > > http://release.debian.org/testing/goals.yaml > > > > So we need to extract the goals with state "accepted", find out the > > set of open bugs associated to the usertag (if any), and display > > the TODO entry for any source package affected by one or more > > of the release goal bugs. > > > > I believe that we can use UDD to identify the list of bugs. > > > > Anyone up for the task? Giovanni? Bart? :-) > > Hi, > > I've done http://udd.debian.org/pts-release-goals.cgi > Which provides a YAML list of open RG bugs. Thanks for this! But the output contains all entries twice. Can you fix this ? > I'm leaving the PTS integration for someone else. ;) I'm just finishing it. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Pre-order a copy of the Debian Administrator's Handbook and help liberate it: http://debian-handbook.info/liberation/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120104085134.ga8...@rivendell.home.ouaza.com
Bug#647258: marked as done (qa.debian.org: the PTS should put a TODO for release goal bugs affecting the package)
Your message dated Wed, 04 Jan 2012 09:00:03 + with message-id and subject line qa.debian.org bug fixed in revision 2675 has caused the Debian Bug report #647258, regarding qa.debian.org: the PTS should put a TODO for release goal bugs affecting the package to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 647258: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=647258 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pts The PTS should clearly remind the maintainer when he has release goals bugs that are not yet fixed. ddpo-by-mail used to have such a reminder already. Some coordination with the release team would be nice so that they can provide a stable URL with the current release goals in a YAML format. The information provided would include the usertags used to track the goal. Currently we only have http://release.debian.org/wheezy/goals.txt -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (150, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 2675 This bug was closed by Raphaël Hertzog (hertzog) in SVN revision 2675. Note that it might take some time until the qa.debian.org code has been updated and cronjobs have picked up changed data. Commit message: Implement TODO message telling about release goal bugs. Closes: #647258 --- End Message ---
Bug#647258: qa.debian.org: the PTS should put a TODO for release goal bugs affecting the package
On 04/01/12 at 09:51 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > Thanks to Niels Thykier we now have > > > http://release.debian.org/testing/goals.yaml > > > > > > So we need to extract the goals with state "accepted", find out the > > > set of open bugs associated to the usertag (if any), and display > > > the TODO entry for any source package affected by one or more > > > of the release goal bugs. > > > > > > I believe that we can use UDD to identify the list of bugs. > > > > > > Anyone up for the task? Giovanni? Bart? :-) > > > > Hi, > > > > I've done http://udd.debian.org/pts-release-goals.cgi > > Which provides a YAML list of open RG bugs. > > Thanks for this! But the output contains all entries twice. Can you fix > this ? Done Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120104091013.ga4...@xanadu.blop.info
changing the default bugs view of the DDPO
Hi, Does anyone mind if I make the "sum + RC" view the default of the DDPO? Not only it allows me to see some more of the columns on my small screen, but even on a larger one it gives a clearer view (it goes from "hella + lots + of + bugs" to "bugs + *RC*") Cheers, -- Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer www.debian.org - get.debian.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/je251d$v69$1...@dough.gmane.org
Bug#609800: Done
On Thursday 29 December 2011 10:40:00 Iain Lane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Fixed in r2120 and deployed.
>
> ftpnew.sql: Add new views of the NEW queue for madison.cgi to use
>
> This adds two new views new_{sources,packages}_madison which
> madison.cgi can use to display the NEW queue.
>
> Closes: #609857
>
> Thanks!
Thanks, I just added support for those views in commit r2686. Somebody needs
to svn up cgi-bin/madison.cgi (I won't, qa.d.o's shared svn+ssh setup is
hateful.)
Pass table=new as parameter to use that table.
However, something seems to be broken:
udd=> select package from new_packages;
package
python-ordereddict
(1 row)
udd=> select source from new_sources;
source
-
ordereddict
(1 row)
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201201041253.08979.geiss...@debian.org
Re: changing the default bugs view of the DDPO
Hi, On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 12:16:12PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Does anyone mind if I make the "sum + RC" view the default of the DDPO? > Not only it allows me to see some more of the columns on my small screen, > but even on a larger one it gives a clearer view (it goes from "hella + lots > + of + bugs" to "bugs + *RC*") Not at all, I'm for it. In a similar vein, would it be worthwile hiding the "Excuses" column by default? IMHO, it's only of value if you've recently uploaded something and want to know why it hasn't transitioned to testing (I almost never use it). It's only by also hiding the "Excuses" column that the page is narrow enough to fit onto my screen. Best wishes, Ryan -- |_)|_/ Ryan Kavanagh | GnuPG key | \| \ http://ryanak.ca/ | 4A11C97A signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: changing the default bugs view of the DDPO
On 04/01/12 19:16, Raphael Geissert wrote: Hi, Does anyone mind if I make the "sum + RC" view the default of the DDPO? Not only it allows me to see some more of the columns on my small screen, but even on a larger one it gives a clearer view (it goes from "hella + lots + of + bugs" to "bugs + *RC*") Please do :) Cheers, -- Mehdi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f04a8e8.10...@dogguy.org
Bug#652562: /usr/bin/rmadison: [rmadison] Not showing results for lenny suite
On Tuesday 20 December 2011 10:16:06 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > This is not going to get fixed: it's not possible with the current UDD > setup to provide information for lenny. The tables used for packages > data are already too large for the current machine. I don't know much about postgres, but wouldn't some partitioning and replication help? For such a large (which is not THAT large) data set usage patterns need to be taken into consideration, I don't think any DBMS would excel at handling it out of the box. I think last time I asked somebody from DSA (sorry, I don't remember who that was, but it was on #d-qa) he mentioned some issues with postgres' replication features. Checking now, it seems that even the in-core replication in 9.0+ wouldn't fit us, but slony and pgpool2 seem like they could do it. Can anyone familiar with the subject please comment? Cheers, -- Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer www.debian.org - get.debian.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201201041439.21684.geiss...@debian.org
