Your message dated Tue, 3 Nov 2009 15:36:44 +0100
with message-id <20091103143644.gc3...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#549227: UDD: please collect and expose the load time
for update scripts
has caused the Debian Bug report #549227,
regarding UDD: please collect and expose the load time for update scripts
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
549227: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549227
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
Hi!
It's common in a datawarehouse system (like UDD can be considered) to keep track
of the update jobs times: start, end, duration, records elaborated and so on.
This will allow to query such information to generate a report ob jobs
executions like: durations (mean, stddev, etc), growth, performance, eventual
tuning due to interaction with other scripts, and so no.
Such information, are usually stored in a different (internal) schema than the
main one, but I think we can just add a table in 'udd' (maybe prefixed with
'udd_' to claryfy it's a UDD interal information table) for such information.
Thanks,
Sandro
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 02/11/09 at 22:59 +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 09:47:11PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote [edited]:
> > On 01/10/09 at 20:08 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > > It's common in a datawarehouse system (like UDD can be considered) to
> > > keep track
> > > of the update jobs times: start, end, duration, records elaborated and so
> > > on.
> [..]
> > A patch adding the table you describe would be appreciated (the code
> > would have to be python)
>
> Patch attached. I didn't add a duration column as it's trivially calculated on
> the fly. I'm open to suggestions about getting record counts before and after
> updates in a generic way.
Thanks a lot, I've applied it (the table is named timestamps, not
udd_timestamps) and adapted the check_timestamp script that tell me when
data sources have not been updated for a long time.
> ps. hacking UDD would be more fun without mixed indentation ;)
I thought I had fixed all the files, but I missed udd.py. Fixed now.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--- End Message ---
