Bug#344304: marked as done (qa.debian.org: no charset specified when browsing news)

2008-08-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 

Your message dated Thu, 7 Aug 2008 23:26:18 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#344304: qa.debian.org: no charset specified when 
browsing news
has caused the Debian Bug report #344304,
regarding qa.debian.org: no charset specified when browsing news
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)


-- 
344304: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=344304
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: important
Tags: l10n


When browsing news in Package Tracking System, e.g.

http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/rus-ispell/news/1.html

there is no charset specified neither in HTTP headers, nor in META tag
within the web page. So, non-ASCII characters are not displayed
correctly.

The solution may be to output UTF-8 encoding by default in Content-Type
HTTP header. Documents that use a non-UTF-8 encoding can override this
using the META tag in the HTML document's header.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-386
Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 06:46:11AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > First, the mail in question didn't specifify a Content-Type-Encoding
> > header, while being utf8. It should've done so.
> 
>   (#337968, jftr.)

And in fact, that bug being now fixed, the charset used in PTS news is
now fixed as well. Using rus-ispell as an example, you can verify that
the last broken news is:

  http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/rus-ispell/news/20070827T120206Z.html

while starting from:

  http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/rus-ispell/news/20071223T153207Z.html

the charset is properly set and hence the UTF-8 characters are properly
displayed.

As such, I'm closing this bug. Note that this will not fix all old .html
messages, but I personally do not think it is worth going through the
hassle of fixing the past.

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
[EMAIL PROTECTED],pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
I'm still an SGML person,this newfangled /\ All one has to do is hit the
XML stuff is so ... simplistic  -- Manoj \/ right keys at the right time


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#477446: underlined links

2008-08-07 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli 
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 11:35:05AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Since recently, packages.qa.debian.org and now qa.debian.org are the only web 
> sites in the world that underline hyperlinks.  This hurts my eyes.  My 
> browser 

Done: know underlining is used only upon :hover.

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
[EMAIL PROTECTED],pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
I'm still an SGML person,this newfangled /\ All one has to do is hit the
XML stuff is so ... simplistic  -- Manoj \/ right keys at the right time



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#477446: marked as done (underlined links)

2008-08-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 

Your message dated Fri, 08 Aug 2008 02:36:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line qa.debian.org bug fixed in revision 1926
has caused the Debian Bug report #477446,
regarding underlined links
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)


-- 
477446: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=477446
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal

Since recently, packages.qa.debian.org and now qa.debian.org are the only web 
sites in the world that underline hyperlinks.  This hurts my eyes.  My browser 
can decide for itself when to underline links.

Please change the revamp.css stylesheet to remove all text-decoration: 
underline; specifications.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1926

This bug was closed by Stefano Zacchiroli (zack) in SVN revision 1926.
Note that it might take some time until the qa.debian.org code has
been updated and cronjobs have picked up changed data.

Commit message:

remove underlinying in hyperlinks, use it only when :hover
(Closes: #477446)



--- End Message ---

Bug#243729: machine parseable version of lintian output

2008-08-07 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli 
retitle 243729 [pts] todo should list lintian warning/error summary
thanks

Dear Lintian maintainers,
  I would like to fix #243729 by adding in the TODO section of the PTS
web interface a summary of lintian blames for a given source package. To
do that I would need a machine parseable version of the lintian output.

Is there anything like that available somewhere? I wouldn't like having
to scrape HTML ...

TIA,
Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
[EMAIL PROTECTED],pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
I'm still an SGML person,this newfangled /\ All one has to do is hit the
XML stuff is so ... simplistic  -- Manoj \/ right keys at the right time



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: machine parseable version of lintian output

2008-08-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 243729 [pts] todo should list lintian warning/error summary
Bug#243729: packages.qa.debian.org: Todo should list lintian warnings
Changed Bug title to `[pts] todo should list lintian warning/error summary' 
from `packages.qa.debian.org: Todo should list lintian warnings'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#370087: summarizing ...

2008-08-07 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli 
retitle 370087 [pts] add short description tooltip over binary package names
thanks

Summarizing (and stating what I'm willing to implement :-)), the request
it to add tooltips over package names listed in the "binary packages"
section of the PTS. Each tooltip should contain the _short_ description
of that binary package. Implementation can be done using pure HTML, no
javascript/css needed.

I'm against the proposal of adding an hackishly selected short
description at the top of each PTS page. The reason is simply that we do
not have at all in Debian any reasonable meaning for _source_ package
description. Choosing one randomly among the available _binary_ package
descriptions seems mostly nonsense to me.

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
[EMAIL PROTECTED],pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
I'm still an SGML person,this newfangled /\ All one has to do is hit the
XML stuff is so ... simplistic  -- Manoj \/ right keys at the right time



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: summarizing ...

2008-08-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 370087 [pts] add short description tooltip over binary package names
Bug#370087: Please include the package description.
Changed Bug title to `[pts] add short description tooltip over binary package 
names' from `Please include the package description.'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#243729: machine parseable version of lintian output

2008-08-07 Thread Russ Allbery 
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> retitle 243729 [pts] todo should list lintian warning/error summary
> thanks
>
> Dear Lintian maintainers,
>   I would like to fix #243729 by adding in the TODO section of the PTS
> web interface a summary of lintian blames for a given source package. To
> do that I would need a machine parseable version of the lintian output.
>
> Is there anything like that available somewhere? I wouldn't like having
> to scrape HTML ...

http://lintian.debian.org/lintian.log

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])   



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#243729: machine parseable version of lintian output

2008-08-07 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli 
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 08:38:31PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> http://lintian.debian.org/lintian.log

Cool. One questions and one suggestion then:

- question: is there already available reusable parsing code for that
  format? If not I can hack up something to be embedded into
  python-debian, as I presume the code can be useful to somebody else

- suggestion: please link the above URL from the Lintian website, so
  that other people like me will avoid bothering you in the future with
  this request :)

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
[EMAIL PROTECTED],pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
I'm still an SGML person,this newfangled /\ All one has to do is hit the
XML stuff is so ... simplistic  -- Manoj \/ right keys at the right time



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#370465: PTS: http://packages.qa.debian.org/common/index.html could set the focus automatically to the input field

2008-08-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 370465 + wontfix
Bug#370465: PTS: http://packages.qa.debian.org/common/index.html could set the 
focus automatically to the input field
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#418689: marked as done (Please include packages NEWS file)

2008-08-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 

Your message dated Fri, 8 Aug 2008 01:43:16 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#418689: Please include packages NEWS file
has caused the Debian Bug report #418689,
regarding Please include packages NEWS file
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)


-- 
418689: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=418689
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal

Please include the NEWS file from packages if they have one.

MfG
Goswin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-xen-frosties
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 12:24:41PM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> > Please include the NEWS file from packages if they have one.
> 
> that is, a link to NEWS file like changelog?
> this should be provided by packages.d.o, perhaps the bug belongs there? as
> discussed on IRC

Actually I agree that this bug belongs to packages.d.o, the main reason
being that the PTS is _source_ based while NEWS file are specific to
_binary_ packages. (The fact that dh_installchangelogs might install a
NEWS file in all binary packages matching a single source package is an
unimportant detail IMHO.)

So, while I see the reason of existence of #419201, I do not see the
reason why #418689 still exists. Even when #419201 will be fixed, the
PTS will not need to show anything more than the already existing links
to packages.d.o.  Hence, closing this bug report.

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
[EMAIL PROTECTED],pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
I'm still an SGML person,this newfangled /\ All one has to do is hit the
XML stuff is so ... simplistic  -- Manoj \/ right keys at the right time


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#243729: machine parseable version of lintian output

2008-08-07 Thread Russ Allbery 
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Cool. One questions and one suggestion then:
>
> - question: is there already available reusable parsing code for that
>   format? If not I can hack up something to be embedded into
>   python-debian, as I presume the code can be useful to somebody else

There isn't parsing code in Python.  :)

It's a fairly trivial regex parse, which is done by the Lintian scripts
but not in a way that is very extractable (mostly because it's so trivial
that we've not bothered).

next if $line /^N:/;
next unless $line =~ /^([EWIXO]): (\S+)(?: (\S+))?: (\S+)(?:\s+(.*))?/;
my ($code, $package, $type, $tag, $extra) = ($1, $2, $3, $4, $5);
$type = 'binary' unless $type;

$type should be source, binary, or udeb.  $package is the name of the
package of that type, $tag is the tag, and $extra is any additional tag
data.  The $code will be E(rror), W(arning), I(nfo), (e)X(perimental), or
O(verridden).  Lines starting with N: are informational output that should
be ignored.

> - suggestion: please link the above URL from the Lintian website, so
>   that other people like me will avoid bothering you in the future with
>   this request :)

Will do.

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])   



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]