Bug#468474: please add armel to debcheck
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: minor Can you please add armel debcheck now that armel is included in the archive? http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?list=INDEX&package=&arch=&dist=sid There might be other places at qa.d.o where armel is missing from, but so far this is the only place I found. -- "rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: QA Upload: libpalm-perl - Perl 5 modules for manipulating pdb and prc database files
-=| Frank Lichtenheld, Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 09:58:50PM +0100 |=- > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:17:31AM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote: > > Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > >The whole OPTIMIZE stuff seems unneccessary, since this is an Arch: all > > >package. > > I thought so too but it's on the policy page. Should I go ahead and > > remove it anyway? Which policy is that? It needs a bug report if it requires OPTIMIZE for arch:all packages. > The policy example doesn't handle noopt correctly and you corrected > that. So you too seem to think that the policy is not everything ;) > > Creating completly unused code just for the sake of it is never a good > idea in my book. I would still advide to remove it. > > Does anyone on debian-perl disagree? I routinely remove unneeded OPTIMIZE setting. I can't tell I am stripping *all* of the redundant bits of the packaging, but since OPTIMIZE is so clearly unneeded and so easy to spot, it is an easy target. -- damJabberID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
co-mentor wanted for a QA GSOC project
Hi, I'd like to propose this GSOC project: http://wiki.debian.org/SummerOfCode2008/UltimateDebianDatabase However, I would prefer to share the mentoring with someone else, in case I get too busy with other things at some point. Is someone interested? Also, is someone reading this list interested in being the student? -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#468474: marked as done (please add armel to debcheck)
Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:25:47 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#468474: please add armel to debcheck has caused the Debian Bug report #468474, regarding please add armel to debcheck to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately.) -- 468474: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=468474 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: qa.debian.org Severity: minor Can you please add armel debcheck now that armel is included in the archive? http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?list=INDEX&package=&arch=&dist=sid There might be other places at qa.d.o where armel is missing from, but so far this is the only place I found. -- "rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Riku Voipio wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: minor > > Can you please add armel debcheck now that armel is included in the > archive? Done, should be visible after next run of data fetching (tomorrow?)... > There might be other places at qa.d.o where armel is missing from, but > so far this is the only place I found. If you do find other places, feel free to prod us again :-) Cheers Luk --- End Message ---
Re: RFS: QA Upload: libpalm-perl - Perl 5 modules for manipulating pdb and prc database files
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:56:27PM +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > -=| Frank Lichtenheld, Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 09:58:50PM +0100 |=- > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:17:31AM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote: > > > Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > > >The whole OPTIMIZE stuff seems unneccessary, since this is an Arch: all > > > >package. > > > I thought so too but it's on the policy page. Should I go ahead and > > > remove it anyway? > > Which policy is that? It needs a bug report if it requires OPTIMIZE for > arch:all packages. It is only in an example, but it is in the Perl Policy. FWIW, I'm already working on a patch. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
