Status of serpento (Was: Status of your packages)
Hi, I found this mail when cleaning my mailbox. It's about 1,5 years old but only one NMU since this time. The package gathered some new bugs without any response from the maintainer. I'd regard this package as orphaned. Kind regards Andreas. On Sun, 23 Jul 2006, Radovan Garabik wrote: On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 01:23:34AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-18 15:06]: http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2006/03/msg00089.html I asked whether we might want to remove serpento. I'd vote for it but my question was ignored. I am working on a new serpento release, that will solve all the issues. Of course, real life interfers with my intentions more than I would like, but hopefully a new package will be out soon. On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 06:42:17PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: Hi It seems like the status of many of your packages have improved this year. Though it looks like the status of some of them are not improved at all. It looks like you're not really interested anymore in these latter packages. As the status of the packages seem to correlate with the maintainer's email address we as MIA Team want to propose that you move all the packages you still want to maintain away from your [EMAIL PROTECTED] address in one month. So we could take care of orphaning the packages that remain with your melkor address in one month from now on. What do you think? Well, I am slowly migrating my packages to my new e-mail address, leaving behind those that I am less interested in, so obviously those left are already in a bad shape... so I think you can go ahead, although, time permitting, I think I will do some fixes and uploads orphaning the packages by myself. -- --- | Radovan Garabík http://kassiopeia.juls.savba.sk/~garabik/ | | __..--^^^--..__garabik @ kassiopeia.juls.savba.sk | --- Antivirus alert: file .signature infected by signature virus. Hi! I'm a signature virus! Copy me into your signature file to help me spread! -- http://fam-tille.de
Bug#264145: ddpo: please make bug-severity grouping more configurable
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 11:27, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > In particular, please consider moving wontfix bugs away. If the > maintainers are aware and haev a good reason to not fix that, they > must either be considered closed (maybe not good), or, better, be in a > separate column. To add even more: maybe the un-merged bug numbers (numbers between parentheses) can just be done away with. This is a summary, and merged bugs are not that relevant, they just clutter the view, in my opinion. Thijs pgpLuR5ezrypH.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#264145: ddpo: please make bug-severity grouping more configurable
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 12:52:59PM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: wishlist > > Hi Igor - thanks for this configurability work ! > > Would it be possible to define different groupings of bugs ? I'd like > to separate important from normal, and maybe minor from wishlist. In particular, please consider moving wontfix bugs away. If the maintainers are aware and haev a good reason to not fix that, they must either be considered closed (maybe not good), or, better, be in a separate column. Thanks! Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 458, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#455214: qa.debian.org: add a usercategory for svnbuildstat on the qa.debian.org BTS pseudo package
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 11:53:58AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > It would be a good idea to allow QA-related services to use the > qa.debian.org pseudopackage for their bug tracking. Nothing against the principle (more than this: neat idea indeed!), but I would like this to be done only for stuff hosted on *.debian.org machines. This would also encourage services to be moved under *.debian.org ... If not, it would be possible in theory to have bugs reported against qa.debian.org which are not fixable by anyone in Debian. > So, could someone add a usercategory for svnbuildstat, and also document > how to do that in the future in this bug report? So, are we in the position to move svnbuildstat on *.debian.org machines? Would it be possible given that Goneri is not a DD? Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ... now what? [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ (15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ?/\All one has to do is hit the (15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema\/right keys at the right time signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Remove groovy
Hi, I kindly object to having groovy removed! I absolutely need it for the next FreeMind release, that I expect to get in Debian at last! In response to Marcus (Better), I looked a while ago in groovy and there were still some packages missing, but, in deed, doing a better job than currently shouldn't be too hard. OK, I can have a look if nobody else wants it. Is the maintainer Markus Crafter somewhat MIA? Eric Paul Wise wrote: On Dec 10, 2007 7:14 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It was reported to the Security Team, that groovy embeds a lot of packages, several of them security-sensitive: Since it's in contrib, it's not security-supported, but given the state of it (outdated, hardly any users) it should likely be just removed? Unless anyone objects within the next days, I'll file an RM bug. Perhaps people on the debian-java list should be given the chance to adopt or fix groovy or give an opinion on it's usefulness? CCing them. I'm also hoping icedtea will happen for lenny so maybe it will be able to move to main. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#455214: qa.debian.org: add a usercategory for svnbuildstat on the qa.debian.org BTS pseudo package
On 11/12/07 at 16:05 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 11:53:58AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > It would be a good idea to allow QA-related services to use the > > qa.debian.org pseudopackage for their bug tracking. > > Nothing against the principle (more than this: neat idea indeed!), but I > would like this to be done only for stuff hosted on *.debian.org > machines. This would also encourage services to be moved under > *.debian.org ... I kind of see it the other way around: integrating external services in the BTS allows to improve them, making them better candidates for hosting on d.o machines. Also, I'm not sure that we should try too hard to get those services on d.o machines: DSA is usually a bottleneck, and if services run very well elsewhere, there's not much point in moving them to d.o. > If not, it would be possible in theory to have bugs reported against > qa.debian.org which are not fixable by anyone in Debian. That's a problem. But isn't it already the case? Also, if svnbuildstat moves to a restricted d.o machine, it won't change anything. > > So, could someone add a usercategory for svnbuildstat, and also document > > how to do that in the future in this bug report? > > So, are we in the position to move svnbuildstat on *.debian.org > machines? Would it be possible given that Goneri is not a DD? I don't think so: AFAIK svnbuildstat runs on a dedicated server currently, and has a quite complex setup. There was some talks about moving it to piatti.d.o though, but I'm not sure of the status of this. Ccing Holger and Goneri since they might be able to answer that. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
Re: Remove groovy
On 11/12/07 at 22:31 +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote: > Hi, > > I kindly object to having groovy removed! I absolutely need it for the next > FreeMind release, that I expect to get in Debian at last! > > In response to Marcus (Better), I looked a while ago in groovy and there > were still some packages missing, but, in deed, doing a better job than > currently shouldn't be too hard. > > OK, I can have a look if nobody else wants it. Is the maintainer Markus > Crafter somewhat MIA? He is. The package has been orphaned (see #382815), but then Torsten Werner (added to Cc) ITAed it. Lucas > Paul Wise wrote: >> On Dec 10, 2007 7:14 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> It was reported to the Security Team, that groovy embeds a lot of packages, several of them security-sensitive: >> Since it's in contrib, it's not security-supported, but given the state of it (outdated, hardly any users) it should likely be just removed? >>> Unless anyone objects within the next days, I'll file an RM bug. >> >> Perhaps people on the debian-java list should be given the chance to >> adopt or fix groovy or give an opinion on it's usefulness? CCing them. >> >> I'm also hoping icedtea will happen for lenny so maybe it will be able >> to move to main. >> > > -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#392372: marked as done (qa.debian.org: watch file not working with no error message available)
Your message dated Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:42:21 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing: qa.debian.org: watch file not working with no error message available has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist In my qa page there are a lot of watch errors, but none with a proper message. see for example: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=gareuselesinge&comaint=yes and http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/maintainer.php?name=lua-expat If called from the command line these watch files seem to work properly. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- Enrico Tassi --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Your DDPO page shows the information correctly. The source of the problem might have been nothing but a temporary error. -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html --- End Message ---
Database of gastroenterologists and many more specialties
Board Certified Doctors in the USA 788,424 in total <> 17,650 emails Many popular specialties like Emergency Medicine, Plastic Surgery, OBGYN, Oncology, Pediatrics and more Over a dozen sortable fields Dramatic cost reduction: $397 === GET THE 4 ITEMS BELOW AS A GIFT WHEN YOU ORDER === Pharmaceutical Companies in the United States Names and email addresses of 47,000 employees in high-ranking positions Listing of US Hospitals more than 23k hospital administrators in over 7k hospitals [worth over $300 alone) Extensive Listing of Dentists in the USA Virtually every dentist in the USA with full contact details American Chiropractors Directory 100,000 Chiropractors in the USA (worth $250 alone) reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] valid thru Dec 14 and email with 995 in the subject will ensure no further communication from us -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Remove groovy
On Dec 11, 2007 11:48 PM, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/12/07 at 22:31 +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote: > > I kindly object to having groovy removed! I absolutely need it for the next > > FreeMind release, that I expect to get in Debian at last! > > He is. The package has been orphaned (see #382815), but then Torsten > Werner (added to Cc) ITAed it. Debian's groovy 0.1 currently FTBFS because libmockobject-java has been removed from sid, which it is broken by itself. Groovy 1.0 needs radeox which is not packaged (yet) but I had some discussions with upstream. I'll check the brand new version 1.5 ASAP. Cheers, Torsten -- blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/ homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
