Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#433408: /usr/bin/uscan: sf redirector broken

2007-09-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> clone 433408 -1
Bug#433408: /usr/bin/uscan: sf redirector broken
Bug 433408 cloned as bug 441077.

> reassign -1 qa.debian.org
Bug#441077: /usr/bin/uscan: sf redirector broken
Bug reassigned from package `devscripts' to `qa.debian.org'.

> retitle -1 sf.net redirection doesn't always work
Bug#441077: /usr/bin/uscan: sf redirector broken
Changed Bug title to `sf.net redirection doesn't always work' from 
`/usr/bin/uscan: sf redirector broken'.

> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> usertag -1 webpages
Bug#441077: sf.net redirection doesn't always work
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: webpages.
> merge -1 427269
Bug#441077: sf.net redirection doesn't always work
Bug#427269: devscripts: sf.net redirection works not for all package
Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged:
Values for `severity' don't match:
 #441077 has `normal';
 #427269 has `important'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bug#433408: /usr/bin/uscan: sf redirector broken

2007-09-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt

clone 433408 -1
reassign -1 qa.debian.org
retitle -1 sf.net redirection doesn't always work
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usertag -1 webpages
merge -1 427269
thanks

Hi,

Daniel Leidert wrote:

This is probably not a uscan issue. I e.g. also couldn't use such a
watch file for the docbook-xsl package for a long time. Now the
docbook/ directoy (and also the dar/ directory) seems back on this
mirror and the redirector works again.

[...]

But maybe the qa.debian.org redirector could use this as last fallback
to workaround missing directories on heanet.dl.sf.net (which seems to
be the used mirror server).


This is a known issue with the redirector - see #427269 and #418978 for 
example.


The redirector is maintained by the QA team, so I'm cloning a copy of the 
bug.


Regards,

Adam 



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: severity of 441077 is important, merging 441077 427269

2007-09-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
> # Nearly...
> severity 441077 important
Bug#441077: sf.net redirection doesn't always work
Severity set to `important' from `normal'

> merge 441077 427269
Bug#427269: devscripts: sf.net redirection works not for all package
Bug#441077: sf.net redirection doesn't always work
Merged 427269 441077.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#427269: severity of 441077 is important, merging 441077 427269

2007-09-06 Thread Adam D . Barratt
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
# Nearly...
severity 441077 important
merge 441077 427269



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: About querying bugs via LDAP

2007-09-06 Thread Dario Minnucci (midget)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


Hi damog (+ fabricas) :),

David Moreno Garza wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 17:47 +0200, Dario Minnucci (midget) wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Does anybody here can answer a few questions about querying bugs using LDAP?
>>
>> Addition of a new field:
>> - 
>> Is it possible to have a field a new field that provides the last 
>> modification
>> timestam. For instance: 'debbugsLastModified: 1188487383' or something 
>> similar?
>>
>> So will be able to get latest changes using:
>> ldapsearch -p 10101 -h bts2ldap.debian.net -x -b
>> dc=current,dc=bugs,dc=debian,dc=org "(&(debbugsLastModified>=1188487383))"
> 
> I think it's impossible. Long time ago, like two years ago, I hacked the
> bts2ldap for exactly that, but that wasn't important or relevant for its
> upstream author, since I never got any feedback or comments or even
> rejection about it.


It's important for me (and maybe for others) because I cannot imagine another
way to get latest bug modifications in order to update my records locally.

Anyway, bts2ldap update time seems too slow to have a kind-of realtime 
datasource.

I'll try to contact bts2ldap author and ask a couple of questions about the
LDAP update process 'cause it's not documented at
http://people.debian.org/~aba/bts2ldap/


> However, Don has done a good work with the SOAP interface for debbugs,
> which you can use nicely:
>  http://wiki.debian.org/DebbugsSoapInterface


Yes, I've been playing wit Don's SOAP API, but I have the same problem with it.

I can query BTS and get realtime data, lastest bugs, bug logs, and a few more
filtered data, but even though 'last modification' data is present in a bug
report, there is no way to query the datasource using that field.

The only way to retrieve this data in a useful way is query the WHOLE database
each time and analize the retrieved records looking at this field, and then get
all the information related to each retrieved bug number. NO WAY! :(

I think the impossibility to make realtime queries is because distributed
databases are not welcome... but, presently there is no centralized datasource
containing all the possible package/bug data.
e.g. (programmig language data, licence data, popcon data, etc...)


>> Syncronization times:
>> - -
>> How often the records available via LDAP, are update?
>> If I submit an action over a bug (e.g.: bts reassign # wnpp or bts retitle #
>> "NewTitle"), how long it takes to be reflected in the available LDAP record?
> 
> Using the SOAP interface, that's immediately, AFAICT.

True, it's realtime!


Thanks for your answer.

Cheers.


- --

 Dario Minnucci (a.k.a. midget)
 Phone: (+34) 902021030 | Fax: (+34) 902024417 | 24/7: (+34) 807429057
 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | URL: http://www.midworld.net/midget/
 Key fingerprint = 6DDB 5487 7F6D 89D4 5D9C  33C7 D181 DD7A 6C42 8272

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG4LBj0YHdemxCgnIRAn9dAJ9dbLYrILEPWacG+NhJnhBvT13HgwCfbc6Z
dxaZUrBOsm8GLr3tNaSnL50=
=Gx/w
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]