Re: [Pkg-zope-developers] Should we remove zope-cmf 1.3?

[Fabio Tranchitella]

Il giorno lun, 24/10/2005 alle 05.29 +0200, Matej Vela ha scritto:
> Hi,
> 
> zope-cmf 1.3 and its reverse dependencies have been orphaned since
> June [1].  They need to be updated for the cdebconf transition [2],
> but they seem to be incompatible with Zope 2.7 and later (for which
> zope-cmf1.4 and zope-cmf1.5 are packaged).  Is a QA upload still worth
> it, or should we simply remove zope-cmf 1.3?
> 
> [1]  -- zope-cmf
>  -- zope-cmfldap
>  -- zope-cmfpgforum
>  -- zope-cmfworkflow
> [2] 
> 

I will ask for the removal of zope, zopectl, zope-cmf and related
dependencies as soon as I'll have a bit of free time.

Thanks for pointing this out,

-- 
Fabio Tranchitella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.''`.
Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :'  :
 `. `'`
   http://people.debian.org/~kobold/   `-
_
1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Should we remove python-slang and woody?

[tom]

IMO, just remove them.

Tom Cato

On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 04:31:36AM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 00:28:53 +0200, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote:
> > I'm orphaning this because I don't have time/interest to fix
> > it to rebuild it with slang2. The only package depending on it
> > is woody (outliner/todo editor) which I also will orphan because
> > I don't use it any more.
> >
> > IMO, we should just remove this package from the archive.
> 
> python-slang and woody have been uninstallable since July due to the
> slang1->libslang1 transition.  Do you think it's time to remove them,
> or should we do a QA upload?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Matej
> 

-- 
Tom Cato Amundsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.solfege.org/
GNU Solfege - free ear traininghttp://www.gnu.org/software/solfege/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RM: libtool1.4 -- RoQA; obsolete version

[Kurt Roeckx]

retitle 266387 RM: libtool1.4 -- RoQA; obsolete version
reassign 266387 ftp.debian.org
thanks

The last package build depending on it (freeradius) recently
removed the build dependency on libtool1.4, and has reached
testing now.  There is no reason to still keep libtool1.4 around
anymore.


Kurt


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Rafal Zawadzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIA, packages need orphaning

[Nathanael Nerode]

All three of his packages are in NMU versions, and all three are unchanged
since the release of sarge.  Last upload 2004-06-20 (asciijump),
last upload of the other two packages 2002-11-25.  Asciijump is uninstallable,
and also has a bug (255934) with a fix reported but which is not fixed.
Blackbook is dead upstream and needs to undergo the C++ transition.

Screentest is actually usable.

Strongly suggest orphaning his packages.

-- 
Nathanael Nerode  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

A thousand reasons. http://www.thousandreasons.org/
Lies, theft, war, kidnapping, torture, rape, murder...
Get me out of this fascist nightmare!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]