Re: Tracking of recently filed QA bugs
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > To see what I've done until now, look at this page: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=proposed-orphan,proposed-removal;[EMAIL > PROTECTED];pri0=tag:proposed-removal,proposed-orphan This is more sophisticated (though the URI is ugly as hell): http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=proposed-orphan,proposed-removal;[EMAIL PROTECTED];nam0=Status;pri0=tag:proposed-removal,proposed-orphan;ttl0=Proposed to be removed,Proposed to be orphaned;nam1=Severity;pri1=severity:critical,grave,serious,important,normal,minor,wishlist;ttl1=Critical,Grave,Serious,Important,Normal,Minor,Wishlist,Unknown Severity;ord1=0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7 Marc -- BOFH #104: backup tape overwritten with copy of system manager's favourite CD pgpvf1pAcKqwC.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Tracking of recently filed QA bugs
Hi Marc, Le lundi 12 septembre 2005 à 01:06 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt a écrit : > Heya, > > Frank and I checked a bunch of very old packages and filed some bugs > about them - I just added usertags for "my" bugs to make tracking > easier. Bugs that propose to remove the package and give the maintainer > some time to react are now tagged "proposed-removal", bugs that ping the > maintainer and will lead to orphaning the package use "proposed-orphan". > I've used debian-qa@lists.debian.org as user for all of this. This is a nice way to handle it indeed. I suggest you start documenting the procedure in the new wiki somewhere for example a new page : http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/removals (at least with the ugly URLs so that we have them somewhere else than just the mailing list archives...) Later on we should remove http://qa.debian.org/howto-remove.html and point it to the right wiki page (or integrate it in the website, but I don't think this is needed). FWIW, I used the wiki to document things about the PTS : http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/pts Regards, PS: If you can find a way to exclude from your listing bugs which have already been reassigned to ftp.debian.org (even if they still have the original usertag), that would be nice. -- Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://www.ouaza.com Freexian : des développeurs Debian au service des entreprises http://www.freexian.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is xmovie still maintained?
Hello, I summariezed the problems in my last mail to "my" bug on xmovie http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=140474 a while ago, but in short I see the following: No upload since 2002, old packaging (c.f. policy version!), several simple patches in the BTS, limited use, upstream version much higher than in Debian, no answer to the bugs in the BTS (even for the simple ones, not even an acknowledgement), claims to support alpha but only provides i386 binaries (c.f. my bug report), only in contrib. I tried to build more recent version on my alpha, but failed. The build includes lots of software available independently from Debian, but it is quite entangled. Please have a look if this software is really maintained and required. Please CC: me as I am not subscribed, thanks. Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg signed mail preferred 64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ pgpZrFyiRFPc6.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Mail Delivery (failure [EMAIL PROTECTED])
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ViVateam.it VivaTeam ti ringrazia per averci inviato il tuo curriculum vitae. Il nostro ufficio di selezione del personale valutera' la tua candidatura e in caso di valutazione positiva verrai contattato a breve per fissare un colloquio presso una delle nostre sedi. Original Message -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327880: packages.qa.debian.org: Copyright link pointing to the wrong file
Package: qa.debian.org Tags: patch The "Copyright" link in the "Other links" section of the PTS currently points to $package.copyright instead of just copyright. Not knowing if this is intentional and soon to be fixed on packages.d.o, here's a patch to fix the link: Index: www/xsl/pts.xsl === RCS file: /cvs/qa/pts/www/xsl/pts.xsl,v retrieving revision 1.56 diff -r1.56 pts.xsl 558,562c558 < / < < < < .copyright --- > /copyright -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is xmovie still maintained?
El lunes, 12 de septiembre de 2005 19:50, Helge Kreutzmann escribió: > Hello, > I summariezed the problems in my last mail to "my" bug on xmovie > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=140474 > a while ago, but in short I see the following: > > No upload since 2002, old packaging (c.f. policy version!), several > simple patches in the BTS, limited use, upstream version much higher > than in Debian, no answer to the bugs in the BTS (even for the simple > ones, not even an acknowledgement), claims to support alpha but only > provides i386 binaries (c.f. my bug report), only in contrib. > > I tried to build more recent version on my alpha, but failed. The > build includes lots of software available independently from Debian, > but it is quite entangled. > > Please have a look if this software is really maintained and required. > > Please CC: me as I am not subscribed, thanks. Hello, Helge. I was sure that I replied you, but given that I am in the final stages of my career exams, it is probably that I gave up while writing the mail. In short, I tried no less than three times, in all this time of "inactivity", to rebuild and upgrade xmovie. In fact, if you look into the libquicktime changelog, you will see that I sent several mails to Gerd Knorr in order to include some problems that I found while building xmovie. libquicktime as upstream sees is impossible (with its current dependencies on lame) to package. Gerd Knorr packaged it years ago, but gave up and instead packaged an interesting project called libquicktime (http://libquicktime.sf.net) that aimed to maintain full binary compatibility with upstream libquicktime4linux, plus the possibility of using third-party codecs like Sorenson ones (modern Quicktime codecs, in short). But every time I tried to build, it failed with this or that error. Upstream of libquicktime seemed halted, and I began to think into removing xmovie from Debian. But several weeks ago (I do not remember if it was triggered by a mail from you or I saw in the apt-listchanges report) I saw that libquicktime bumped a lot its version number. Those guys seem to be doing things again. So I promised myself to try again after my *last* exam before getting my grade on Physics. I am really sorry that you are so annoyed. Please accept my apologies. I will report again in a week. Adeodato Simó is bugging me on IRC about this thing...I think that the last QA meeting awaked his QA skills. :-) Best regards to all, and specially to Helge, Ender. -- Network engineer Debian Developer pgp7KlujfWEaq.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Is xmovie still maintained?
Hello David, On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 09:13:53PM +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote: > Hello, Helge. I was sure that I replied you, but given that I am in the > final > stages of my career exams, it is probably that I gave up while writing the > mail. I did not get an E-Mail from you in the last years (thats one reason I sent this E-Mail to debian-qa). But given your real life, concentrate there. > So I promised myself to try again after my *last* exam before getting my > grade on Physics. Ok, then good luck in your exam (I have a PhD in physics, so I guess I can imagine ...) and for packaging xmovie afterwards. Given that the last upload happend 2002, a few more weeks do not matter now. > I am really sorry that you are so annoyed. Please accept my apologies. No apologies needed. Its just that my interest in getting xmovie has diminished, as my alpha (where I had one xmovie-only "movie") has troubles and on amd64 I have not yet encountered a xmovie-only movie, so my need for this software has diminished. But if you supply a (more) current version, I will still give it a spin (especially if it can be made to compile on amd64). And now back to Schrödinger and the consequences of his non-relativistic, single-body approximation of the world we live in (and don't anoy the cat!). Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg signed mail preferred 64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ pgpSrQDHBuGYt.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#327880: packages.qa.debian.org: Copyright link pointing to the wrong file
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 12:34:46PM -0600, Philipp Kern wrote: > The "Copyright" link in the "Other links" section of the PTS currently > points to $package.copyright instead of just copyright. Not knowing if > this is intentional and soon to be fixed on packages.d.o, here's a > patch to fix the link: Hrm, I had it right first and than committed the changed reverted by your patch. I still don't know what I was thinking in this moment... Too much caffein, not enough sleep I guess Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#68223 acknowledged by developer ()
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report #68223: RFP: tclhttpd -- TCL-based webserver, which was filed against the wnpp package. It has been closed by one of the developers, namely Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate message then please contact the developer, by replying to this email. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) Received: (at 68223-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 22:53:19 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 15:53:19 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from natnoddy.rzone.de [81.169.145.166] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EExAt-io-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:53:19 -0700 Received: from ngolde.de (G93c7.g.pppool.de [80.185.147.199]) by post.webmailer.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j8CMrH6H015522 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:53:17 +0200 (MEST) Received: by ngolde.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2CAA1530008; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:53:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:53:30 +0200 From: Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3" Content-Disposition: inline X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 6.3 (2004 June 7, compiled Sep 1 2005 16:46:46) X-Mailer: Mutt-ng http://www.muttng.org X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux sid X-My-Homepage: http://www.ngolde.de User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r472 (Debian) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,NOSUBJECT autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, this bug is very old and no reaction from you. Therefore I=20 close the bug. If you are still interested in maintaining=20 this program please reopen the bug otherwise retile it to=20 RFP to request that someone else makes a package if someone=20 is interested in this. Regards Nico --=20 Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org=20 VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps=20 and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDJgbqHYflSXNkfP8RAkwsAJ9u3A/42lj1VN1ZZ0cy+IX6+ZF/NgCglRB4 3dYxcmhOnrNo76ybH+JlYwE= =MomM -END PGP SIGNATURE- --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
