request for help: #297246 - pfe: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in increment

2005-03-07 Thread Stephen Stafford
Hi,

I am in the process of moving to London and as such don't have proper internet
access for several weeks (specifically I don't have machines to develop/test
on).

I would appreciate it if somebody could look at #297246 and NMU a fix for me.

The submitter has provided a patch, but Colin Watson tried it and it refused to
build on PowerPC.

I appreciate any time that anyone is able to give to this issue.

Thanks,
Stephen
-- 
Stephen Stafford   | Development and support consultant
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.clothcat.org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>|   Never put off until tomorrow what you can
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   |   con someone into doing for you today


This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



ONLINE pha rmacy BUY DIRECT

2005-03-07 Thread Wilfred Diggs

BUY D1SCOUNTED dr ugz DIRECT! 

SAV3 70% NO prescr1tption z REQUIRED
DELIVERY [EMAIL PROTECTED] OVERNIGHT DISCR33T PACKAGING

LEARN MORE: HtTp://marjoram.lastjuneina.com/?a=342houdini


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: libunicode help required

2005-03-07 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 10:06:15AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> 
> I don't see any problems with my patch, though I started with running
> autoupdate before executing the other commands. It builds without any
> problem and it has the 'pass_all' as expected.
> 
> Can you please ellaborate what the problem is? You can find the
> resulting patch at http://zeus.ugent.be/~luk/libunicode.patch
> 

Hi,

Did you follow the instructions to the letter? (Did I for that matter?)

I've done a few of these updates, without major dramas.

Here's what I've done, and where it fell over (this was with an autoupdate
run first):

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/qa/libunicode-0.4.0$ find . -name ltmain.sh -print0 
| xargs -0 grep -H ^VERSION=
./ltmain.sh:VERSION=1.3.4
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/qa/libunicode-0.4.0$ head -1 Makefile.in
# Makefile.in generated automatically by automake 1.4 from Makefile.am
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/qa/libunicode-0.4.0$ grep Generated configure | head 
-1
# Generated automatically using autoconf version 2.13
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/qa/libunicode-0.4.0$ libtoolize --copy --force
You should update your `aclocal.m4' by running aclocal.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/qa/libunicode-0.4.0$ aclocal-1.4
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/qa/libunicode-0.4.0$ autoconf2.13
autoconf: Undefined macros:
configure.in:40:AC_CONFIG_FILES([Makefile
configure.in:47:AC_CONFIG_COMMANDS([default],[[case "$CONFIG_FILES" in
configure.in:4:AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR([unicode.h])


dpkg-source: building libunicode in libunicode_0.4.0-3.dsc
 debian/rules build
dh_testdir
./configure --prefix=/usr
creating cache ./config.cache
./configure: line 695: syntax error near unexpected token `unicode.h'
./configure: line 695: `AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR(unicode.h)'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
pbuilder: Failed autobuilding of package

-- 
linux.conf.au 2005   -  http://linux.conf.au/  -  Birthplace of Tux
April 18th to 23rd   -  http://linux.conf.au/  -   LINUX
Canberra, Australia  -  http://linux.conf.au/  -Get bitten!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: libunicode help required

2005-03-07 Thread Luk Claes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Pollock wrote:
| On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 10:06:15AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
|
|>I don't see any problems with my patch, though I started with running
|>autoupdate before executing the other commands. It builds without any
|>problem and it has the 'pass_all' as expected.
|>
|>Can you please ellaborate what the problem is? You can find the
|>resulting patch at http://zeus.ugent.be/~luk/libunicode.patch
|>
|
|
| Hi,
Hi Andrew
| Did you follow the instructions to the letter? (Did I for that matter?)
No, I just used autoconf (instead of the older autoconf2.13). It doesn't
always work and then it's time to use autoupdate. Using autoconf2.13 is
only appropriate IMHO when upstream denies to use autoconf proper.
| I've done a few of these updates, without major dramas.
|
| Here's what I've done, and where it fell over (this was with an autoupdate
| run first):
|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/qa/libunicode-0.4.0$ find . -name ltmain.sh
- -print0 | xargs -0 grep -H ^VERSION=
| ./ltmain.sh:VERSION=1.3.4
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/qa/libunicode-0.4.0$ head -1 Makefile.in
| # Makefile.in generated automatically by automake 1.4 from Makefile.am
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/qa/libunicode-0.4.0$ grep Generated configure
| head -1
| # Generated automatically using autoconf version 2.13
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/qa/libunicode-0.4.0$ libtoolize --copy --force
| You should update your `aclocal.m4' by running aclocal.
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/qa/libunicode-0.4.0$ aclocal-1.4
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/qa/libunicode-0.4.0$ autoconf2.13
Try this with autoconf instead of autoconf2.13 and it should work (you
used autoupdate after all!).
| autoconf: Undefined macros:
| configure.in:40:AC_CONFIG_FILES([Makefile
| configure.in:47:AC_CONFIG_COMMANDS([default],[[case "$CONFIG_FILES" in
| configure.in:4:AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR([unicode.h])
|
|
| dpkg-source: building libunicode in libunicode_0.4.0-3.dsc
|  debian/rules build
| dh_testdir
| ./configure --prefix=/usr
| creating cache ./config.cache
| ./configure: line 695: syntax error near unexpected token `unicode.h'
| ./configure: line 695: `AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR(unicode.h)'
| make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
| pbuilder: Failed autobuilding of package
|
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCLVeo5UTeB5t8Mo0RAnPVAKC3yadwV28jFH4npCn7UsLzyXPpjwCeMY2S
cK5nGE9QPL5BAxzHbZIpbnw=
=3bk8
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]