Re: Hanno Wagner MIA?
* Nathanael Nerode ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040315 01:40]: > One package (qps), last maintainer upload in the year 2000. > > This package is still a qt2 package compiled with gcc-2.95 (despite what it > says in some of the NMUs). It has a standards version of 2.5.0 and the > postinst sets a /usr/doc symlink. Hanno is still alive. I'm going to contact him. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
Re: Orp in bad shape -- worth keeping or not?
Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 09:10:53PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: >> * Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-13 12:03]: > >> > I looked into this a while ago - it appears to have been abandoned by >> > upstream. It's probably possible to fix it to use TLS instead of >> > peering inside glibc 2.2 internals. > >> Is anyone working on this or is this just wishful thinking? > > Not as far as I know. 1° it's in contrib 2° no upload since Sun, 20 Jan 2002 20:28:33 +0900 http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/contrib/o/orp/orp_1.0.9-1/changelog 3° last upstream update 2002-05-24 00:00 http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=25513 4° only exists on i386 5° at the moment, orp runs with gnu/classpath so it seems to be a virtual machine for java, we already have several JVM in main HTH, Cheers, -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- pgpvObgVkXqlo.pgp Description: PGP signature
[tausq@debian.org: Bug#237347: This bug now renders wmsensors uninstallable in sid]
Can someone please NMU? - Forwarded message from Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Bug#237347: This bug now renders wmsensors uninstallable in sid Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 23:48:13 -0800 To: Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-Debian-PR-Package: wmsensors Nathanael, if you can NMU wmsensors to fix this bug, I'd appreciate it. I'm without an x86 box right now so i cannot easily build this package. thanks randolph -- Randolph Chung Debian GNU/Linux Developer, hppa/ia64 ports http://www.tausq.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] - End forwarded message - -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [tausq@debian.org: Bug#237347: This bug now renders wmsensors uninstallable in sid]
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 03:21:50PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Can someone please NMU? > > - Forwarded message from Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - > > From: Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Bug#237347: This bug now renders wmsensors uninstallable in sid > Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 23:48:13 -0800 > To: Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i > X-Debian-PR-Package: wmsensors > > Nathanael, if you can NMU wmsensors to fix this bug, I'd appreciate > it. I'm without an x86 box right now so i cannot easily build this > package. [...] I could NMU but I would not be able to test the functionality of the package, I have no sensors configured. Urgency=medium or normal? cu andreas
Re: What about removing mozilla-snapshot from unstable as well?
See the thread starting at http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2004/debian-qa-200403/msg00101.html * Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-15 14:25]: > > > Lastest upload of this package was on 2003-10-02 (version > > > 0.0.20031002.13.trunk-1). Since then, mozilla had 6 releases, so I think > > > there is no need for such an ancient cvs release, even in unstable. [...] > > > Moreover, mozilla-snapshot is outdated on 4 archs, and have the following > > > bugs: > > > * Severity > > > o 4 Grave functionality bugs > > > o 3 Serious policy violations > > [...] > > > > I agree it sohuld probably be removed and a mozilla CVS or > > mozilla-snapshot package uploaded to experimental. > I think so too. it should be moved to experimental. > But it is difficult for me(currently) to maintain two versions of > mozilla. > So, I'll orphan it... Is anyone interested in maintaining a mozilla-snapshot package in experimental? -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [tausq@debian.org: Bug#237347: This bug now renders wmsensors uninstallable in sid]
* Martin Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-15 16:37]: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 15:21:50 +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > > Can someone please NMU? > > Done. -- Martin Thanks. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Hanno Wagner MIA?
* Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-15 14:41]: > > One package (qps), last maintainer upload in the year 2000. > > > Hanno is still alive. I'm going to contact him. Yeah, please try again. I mailed him in February and he said he'd fix it, but it hasn't happened so far. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [tausq@debian.org: Bug#237347: This bug now renders wmsensors uninstallable in sid]
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 03:21:50PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > [ request for wmsensors NMU ] > > Can someone please NMU? I can do this in a couple of hours if no one else has yet. -- gram signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [tausq@debian.org: Bug#237347: This bug now renders wmsensors uninstallable in sid]
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 11:22:35AM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 03:21:50PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > [ request for wmsensors NMU ] > > > > Can someone please NMU? > > I can do this in a couple of hours if no one else has yet. Oops. I see that this has been done already. Sorry. -- gram signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: David Martinez Moreno MIA or busy?
El Saturday 13 March 2004 09:06, Nathanael Nerode escribió: > Last upload October. > > xmovie (contrib) has been pretty seriously ignored -- notably bug 140474, > but also all the others. :-p Technically, it has no RC bugs, but I'm > betting that's because nobody's using it. Perhaps he'd rather drop it? Sorry, Nathanael. I'm not MIA, for example I've uploaded two versions of linux-ntfs in the last two weeks. I also accept that xmovie is being ignored by me in the last year or so. Upstream is(was) very narrow-minded. Now it seems to have embraced the fact that maybe some other people wants to package his software. I promise to have a working xmovie in a week. Sorry if it bothered to have ignored your bug (and the others). Regards, Ender. -- Network engineer Debian Developer
Better coordinating when pages update?
So, http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/other/all.html and http://packages.qa.debian.org/ and http://bts.turmzimmer.net/ all show packages as being in 'testing' which aren't, because they were removed on the last run. Perhaps there's some way to schedule the (apparently daily) update of these so that it happens shortly *after* the testing scripts run? (Shortly after the unstable installation scripts run would be good too.) I don't really know what the timing on these things is, but it seems to me this wouldn't be too hard if the timing information was available, and would result in improved accuracy at little cost. -- Make sure your vote will count. http://www.verifiedvoting.org/
Re: David Martinez Moreno MIA or busy?
>Sorry, Nathanael. I'm not MIA, for example I've uploaded two >versions of >linux-ntfs in the last two weeks. Glad to hear it, and sorry about the mistaken suggestion. :-) I thought I'd checked all your packages for most-recent-upload, but I must have missed linux-ntfs. :-/ >I also accept that xmovie is being ignored by me in the last year or >so. >Upstream is(was) very narrow-minded. :-( > Now it seems to have embraced the fact >that maybe some other people wants to package his software. Cool. >I promise to have a working xmovie in a week. OK -- it doesn't need to be *that* quick, as I'm sure linux-ntfs is more important . :-) --Your Friendly Nag
