Re: Restoring qa.d.o
Le Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 03:36:45AM +0100, Peter Palfrader écrivait: > To make absolutely certain that we did not forget anything, I would like > to propose the following: > > > I have made a copy of /org/qa.debian.org on klecker and placed it in > /org/home/weasel/possibly-compromised-copy-of-qa. There is a file named > /org/home/weasel/possibly-compromised-copy-of-qa.list which gives the > audit status for each file or directory. Please update that file if you > audited something that is still marked UNCHECKED. You're editing the file ... and I can't safely update it without fearing that you overwrite what I want to change. Please mark everything below pts/ in CVS head as checked by me. The local copy can be removed and it will be restored from the clean CVS, this copy is not the main one since the PTS is running on master. I checked the copy on master of course since the service is already reenabled. The complete ddpo dir in CVS head has also been checked by Igor (igenibel). As I understand it, the rest in the local copy of the ddpo are only temp files iirc and they could be removed. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://www.ouaza.com Formation Linux et logiciel libre : http://www.logidee.com Earn money with free software: http://www.geniustrader.org
"The maintainer has returned"
Timshel Knoll wrote: I have been MIA for some time but am back ... I've had a very crazy few months organising a wedding, during which time I moved and due to telecommunication company issues lost my internet connection :-(. But it's all back to normal now. Hooray! :-) :-) :-) Gnomba has been orphaned upstream for a considerable period (18 months or so?). I have done some work on upstream since then, but have not really been happy with the way it is packaged, the samba library that is included is done so in a very kludgy way. Sorry I haven't uploaded a fixed version earlier, thanks Peter for the NMU. I'll endeavour to get a release of the patched version from upstream and upload that RSN. Cheers, Timshel
Re: Restoring qa.d.o
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Le Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 03:36:45AM +0100, Peter Palfrader écrivait: > > To make absolutely certain that we did not forget anything, I would like > > to propose the following: > > > > > > I have made a copy of /org/qa.debian.org on klecker and placed it in > > /org/home/weasel/possibly-compromised-copy-of-qa. There is a file named > > /org/home/weasel/possibly-compromised-copy-of-qa.list which gives the > > audit status for each file or directory. Please update that file if you > > audited something that is still marked UNCHECKED. > > You're editing the file ... and I can't safely update it without > fearing that you overwrite what I want to change. Ah, sorry for that. > Please mark everything below pts/ in CVS head as checked by me. done. > The local copy can be removed and it will be restored from the clean fine. > CVS, this copy is not the main one since the PTS is running on master. I > checked the copy on master of course since the service is already > reenabled. > > The complete ddpo dir in CVS head has also been checked by Igor (igenibel). done. > As I understand it, the rest in the local copy of the ddpo are only temp > files iirc and they could be removed. I marked all of pts/ and data/ddpo/ as move away and fetch from cvs. That leaves us with the wml, the bts, wnpp, and mia. tbm, you did review those, right? Did anybody review the CVSROOT? Peter -- PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** messages preferred.| : :' : The universal | `. `' Operating System http://www.palfrader.org/ | `-http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Next round of ITA checking
Hi. Small announcement to avoid doubled work: In August and September I was going through the list of ITA bugs to identify leftover ones. I checked all ITA bugs older than six months, closed around 10 where packages were already uploaded and retitled around 10 back. Two were reassigned to ftp.debian.org requesting removal of packages. After nearly three months I plan a next round of checking. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ pgpNJYE5SlDyq.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Old, ignored RC bugs revisited
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:51:02PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > * request-tracker: Remove from testing and unstable, in keeping with > discussion on this list. (#191165) Any objections? Otherwise I will reassign the ITA #196200 to ftp.debian.org. See also the discussion in this bug. This package seem not to be of any use when I read the bug reports... Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/
