Re: addressbook

2003-12-04 Thread Andrew Pollock
Hello,

I can only assume that you've picked up my name from the latest changelog
entry for the addressbook package.

I made a recent QA upload of this package, just to change who was recorded
as the maintainer. I'm not planning of actively maintaining this package.

What I suggest you do is file a wishlist bug against the addressbook
package, so that if and when it comes under active maintenance again, the
new maintainer will be aware of your patch and your desire for it's
inclusion.

HTH,

Andrew

On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 08:13:43AM +0100, Ralf M?ller wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I am the author of th_BRief (www.deres-mueller.de/tk_Brief) and wrote
> a patch for addressbook to support tk_Brief as a
> letter-programm. Could you think about inserting this patch into
> addressbook?
> 
> It can be found at the tk_Brief page.
> 
> Thank you very much.
> 
> -- 
> Ralf M?ller
> 
> Institut f?r Kristallographie   Tel: 0241 80 96906
> RWTH Aachen   Fax: 0241 80 92184
> D-52056 Aachen 




Old, ignored RC bugs revisited

2003-12-04 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Of the bugs noted in my RC bug trawl two months ago:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2003/debian-qa-200310/msg00037.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2003/debian-qa-200310/msg00038.html
Some (many?) are still open and RC on packages in sarge.

That was a very conservative RC bug trawl.  With a few exceptions, having
a bug on that list was a mark of derelict maintenance, and having one
still open is even more certainly so.

I recommend the following.

First, MIA maintainers whose packages should all be orphaned:

* Sebastian Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Martin Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Hugo Espuny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Martin Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Rens Houben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Chris Ruffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Lenart Janos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I suspected these people of being MIA two months ago; now I'm pretty sure.
:-)  Someone should make a last-ditch effort to contact them and ask them
if they'll voluntarily abandon their 'maintainer' status (or actually
start maintaining their packages) but I'd rather the asker was an official
Debian Developer, preferably an official QA team member.

Next, in package-alphabetical order, old bugs and additional specific
recommendations.

Most of these should be orphaned because the maintainers are obviously not
maintaining them even half-decently, though there are exceptions.  Many
should be removed from testing because they are clearly unsuitable for
release and no fixes are forthcoming; others have bugs with easy fixes or
patches and should be NMUed or QA-uploaded (depending on whether they're
being orphaned or not).  A few should probably be removed entirely.

* cwwm: Remove from testing. (#196133, #192987)
* cl-ftp: No recommendation, but #192007 is still open.
* discover: Orphan & QA-upload.  Its current maintainer(s) are simply not
  maintaining it. (#169264)
* gjdoc: move to contrib, by NMU if necessary. (#199673)
* gnokii: No recommendation, but #197597 is still open & RC.
* hostname: Orphan and QA-upload.  Check whether Doogie still exists.
* jukebox-mercury: NMU (and consider orphaning) (#196470).
* kernel-patch-lpp: Remove from testing and orphan.  (#185641)
* l2tpd: Remove from testing and orphan.  (#198815)
  See if Jean-Francois Dive really wants to be a Debian maintainer; he
  seems almost MIA, but not quite.
* libdbmusic: NMU (and consider orphaning) (#186433).  Madkiss is maintaining
  other things, but does not seem to be on top of this package.
* libgd-perl: Remove from testing (and orphan). (#197998)
* libggi2-dev: QA-upload. (#102675)
* libgtop2: Help wanted -- if you can fix it, do (#194108)
* libxml-filter-xslt-perl: No recommendation, but #197760 is still open & RC.
* logtrend-storageserver: Remove from testing and orphan. (#195291)
  See above note about Jean-Francois Dive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
* mondo: Orphan.  The maintainer seems to be maintaining some
  other packages, but not this one. (#198390)
* mueller: Orphan.  The maintainer seems to be maintaining some
  other packages, but not this one.  (#191206)
* php4-apc: Orphan.  The maintainer seems to be maintaining his other packages
  quite well, but not this one.  (#186565)
* php4-interbase: Supposedly fixed in sid? (#167377, #181316).  Investigate
  the issues here.  :-)
* postnuke: Remove from testing and unstable, in keeping with the comments
  made about it.  Note that this is a cross-site scripting vulnerability, and
  the maintainer appears MIA. (#197636)
* request-tracker: Remove from testing and unstable, in keeping with
  discussion on this list.  (#191165)
* sgmltools-lite: Orphan, since maintainer isn't doing his job. (#168573)
* stellarium: No recommendation, apparently fixed in sid (#198495)
* syscalltrack: Was supposedly being adopted by Alastair McKinstry
  ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- but no progress yet.  Should be removed
  from testing and orphaned.  (#190697)
* sysklogd: Bug should be closed or downgraded, as it has grossly inflated
  severity.  I suppose Joey just hasn't gotten around to it. (#199989)
* timidity: Remove from testing (and orphan). (#166869)
* tk8.0-dev: No recommendation.  I pinged the bug to see if the maintainer
  might have thoughts.  (#195793)
* trafstats: Remove from testing and unstable; it's not buildable and 
  nobody seems to care.
* vlad: Remove from testing and unstable; dead upstream.  Maintainer
  might be MIA too, worth checking.
* vrflash: QA-upload.
* xdialog: Remove from testing or QA-upload.
* xemacs21-packages: #169891 is still open and the maintainer hasn't been
  heard from in quite a while.  Check to see if he's MIA?

That's it.  Hope someone will do something useful with this.

Once these have been dealt with I'll start looking at ignored RC bugs
from August, maybe, in search of more MIA maintainers.  ;-)

-- 
Nathanael Nerode  
http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html



Re: Old, ignored RC bugs revisited

2003-12-04 Thread David Nusinow
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:51:02PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> * discover: Orphan & QA-upload.  Its current maintainer(s) are simply not
>   maintaining it. (#169264)

Could this be because they're working on discover2? I thought that
discover2 was what d-i was going to be using.

 - David Nusinow

p.s. I don't know how capable I am of taking this package, but I'm
willing to try and adopt it and work on this bug if no one more
qualified steps up



Re: Old, ignored RC bugs revisited

2003-12-04 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-04 23:20]:
> > * discover: Orphan & QA-upload.  Its current maintainer(s) are simply not
> 
> p.s. I don't know how capable I am of taking this package, but I'm
> willing to try and adopt it and work on this bug if no one more
> qualified steps up

Progeny said they're going to work on discover2, and Gaudenz Steinlin
has volunteered as well.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Old, ignored RC bugs revisited

2003-12-04 Thread David Nusinow
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 04:05:40PM +1100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Progeny said they're going to work on discover2, and Gaudenz Steinlin
> has volunteered as well.

Ok, fantastic. Are they planning to get it done in time for release, or
are some cleanup uploads of the old package necessary? I'm trying to
get an upload together right now, but I'm having trouble building
against the newest linux-kernel-headers for some reason.

 - David Nusinow