Re: Is cpanel orphaned or not?
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 11:59:18AM +1100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > Well, yeah, it's supposedly not orphaned since foka finally made the > upload; but on the other hand I haven't heard from Kam Tik for ages. > Last time I tried to contact him his email bounced. If that > continues, I'm just going to remove that package. For now, feel free > to close the WNPP bug. Hmm, I'm getting my mail Kam Tik queuing on my mail server... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ host -t mx kamtik.net kamtik.net MX record currently not present [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ host -t ns kamtik.net kamtik.net NS dns1.name-services.com kamtik.net NS dns2.name-services.com kamtik.net NS dns3.name-services.com kamtik.net NS dns4.name-services.com kamtik.net NS dns5.name-services.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ host kamtik.net kamtik.net A 218.188.184.93 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ telnet kamtik.net 25 Trying 218.188.184.93... Might be worth asking Anthony Fok how he gets in contact with him, although if you believe the changelog, Anthony sat on Kam's last package revision for a while before uploading it (and Kam sat on it for a while before sending it to Anthony)... Andrew
Moving a package from non-US to main
Hi, I'm looking at doing QA uploads of gutenbook and gutenbrowser, which are currently in non-US. Martin's commented on both WNPP bugs that they should be uploaded to main, so I'd like to do so for my upload. I'd just like to know if there's anything further I need to do other than change the section from non-US to main? thanks Andrew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Moving a package from non-US to main
* Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-19 17:48]: > I'd just like to know if there's anything further I need to do other > than change the section from non-US to main? Upload to the right machine (ftp-master vs non-us). -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is cpanel orphaned or not?
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 04:41:25PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > Might be worth asking Anthony Fok how he gets in contact with him, > although if you believe the changelog, Anthony sat on Kam's last package > revision for a while before uploading it (and Kam sat on it for a while > before sending it to Anthony)... I have his phone number, and I see him regularly at HKLUG meetings. Hmm... if [EMAIL PROTECTED] is still not working, let me make a phone call to him. Mail bouncing is a problem. As for me sitting on his last package revision... that is me procrastinating, as I often does with my own packages. ... Cheers, Anthony -- Anthony Fok Tung-Ling ThizLinux Laboratory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.thizlinux.com/ Debian Chinese Project <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.debian.org/intl/zh/ Come visit Our Lady of Victory Camp! http://www.olvc.ab.ca/
Re: Could use some web page listing how to report DD MIA
* Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-18 18:54]: > I just visited http://qa.debian.org/> looking for info on how to > report a debian developer that I suspect is missing in action. Hmm, I'll put in a link. > Looking at the plan package, I starting to suspect that the > maintainer Gopal Narayanan is missing in action. If I remember > correctly, the QA team is the group that want these messages, but I > am unable to find out how you want it reported. http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-beyond-pkging.en.html#s-mia-qa > Do you have such system? Do you want it? Should I report the problem > in a different way? Yes, by email, as outlined above. Although I wonder whether it should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] In any case, I think Gopal is active; he made several uploads in the last few months, the last one about 2 weeks ago. Did you try to contact him? -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Repackaged xbubble to split out the data
Hello, it's the upstream author again. Last time we spoke about xbubble, you said that you were woried about the size of the package, which where due to the amount of graphics added since version 0.2.x. You also said that you wanted to split the data in another package, but were lacking the time to do this. So, I did it. In the meanwhile, I completely changed the packaging to use the wonderful cdbs system. You can find the deb package on my homepage on graal.ens-lyon.fr/~mquinson/deb.html Only the debian/changelog is a bit of cruft since I dunno what you want to write in it. I guess you'll have to rewrite it while reviewing the package. I would very pleased if you could upload this package soon, in order to get the package into testing before the freeze. If you don't want to do so, or have no time for xbubble anymore, please consider orphaning it so that someone else can do the work. Thanks for your time, Mt. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Let's remove multi-gnome-terminal
multi-gnome-terminal has several important bugs and no reverse depends. Only issue is that we released it with woody. Are there any objections to removing it from sid/testing? Peter -- PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** messages preferred.| : :' : The universal | `. `' Operating System http://www.palfrader.org/ | `-http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
