Unreachable maintainer: Greg Hookey

2003-11-14 Thread Roger Leigh
Hello,

Greg Hookey is in the NM queue, but has been put on hold by his AM
(madkiss), for reasons I am unaware of, but which I understand
included being uncontactable.  He has not been contactable for well
over two months (I've been trying for about three).  I have not also
seen any signs of activity outside of Debian since at least August
(using Google and Google Groups).  I have also attempted to contact
him through people it appears he is/was associated with
(bagofholding.com) without success (no replies).

Greg is the maintainer of libpqxx (libpqxx0, libpqxx-dev), which was
sponsored by Ryan Murray.  libpqxx has been NMUed by myself twice,
once in early September, and again a few weeks ago.  These NMUs didn't
fix RC bugs, but without a contactable maintainer, there was no one to
respond to any bugs against libpqxx at all.  The only currently open
(non-fixed) bug is an FTBFS on m68k, which looks like an m68k
PostgreSQL issue (looks like it's built OK now).  I've fixed three
bugs in the NMUs.

I pinged Ryan a few weeks ago to see if he knew anything about Greg's
status, but I didn't get a reply back yet.


I would like to request that libpqxx be orphaned.  I am making a lot
of use of libpqxx at the moment (hence my interest in it), so I would
be willing to adopt the package unless there are any objections
against that.


Regards,
Roger


I'm not subscribed to -qa, so I'd appreciate being CC'd on any
replies.  Thanks.

-- 
Roger Leigh

Printing on GNU/Linux?  http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848.  Please sign and encrypt your mail.



Bug#115609 acknowledged by developer (wnpp cleanup)

2003-11-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#115609: RFP: razorback -- Snort Intrusion Detection Front-End for GNOME,
which was filed against the wnpp package.

It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Filip Van Raemdonck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

Their explanation is attached below.  If this explanation is
unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate
message then please contact the developer, by replying to this email.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at 115609-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Nov 2003 11:42:33 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 14 05:42:32 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from slider.rack66.net [212.3.252.135] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AKcLQ-00041k-00; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 05:42:32 -0600
Received: by slider.rack66.net (Postfix, from userid 1026)
id 1E723F2B5; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 12:42:31 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 12:42:30 +0100
From: Filip Van Raemdonck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: wnpp cleanup
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_13
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_13 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Closing the older RFP bug for the newer duplicate ITP bug #197437.

Regards,

Filip

-- 
"If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange apples then you
 and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea and I have
 an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas."
-- George Bernard Shaw



Bug#219753: http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php doesn't respect arch-specific build-deps

2003-11-14 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Josip Rodin wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 11:15:38AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > > Package declares a build time dependency on hurd-dev (>= 20020608-1)
> > > [hurd-i386] which cannot be satisfied on i386.
> > 
> > Ah :)
> > 
> > $arch = 'i386';
> > $deps_arch = 'hurd-i386'
> > ignore unless $deps_arch =~ $arch;
> > 
> > Looks like 'hurd-i386' matches 'i386' :)
> 
> Why don't you use eq instead of =~ (or whatever is the syntax in the
> language of the script in question)?

Because $deps_arch might have been '!foo !bar !blubb'.

Peter
-- 
 PGP signed and encrypted  |  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux **
messages preferred.| : :' :  The  universal
   | `. `'  Operating System
 http://www.palfrader.org/ |   `-http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#219753: http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php doesn't respect arch-specific build-deps

2003-11-14 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 01:56:20AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > > > Package declares a build time dependency on hurd-dev (>= 20020608-1)
> > > > [hurd-i386] which cannot be satisfied on i386.
> > > 
> > > Ah :)
> > > 
> > > $arch = 'i386';
> > > $deps_arch = 'hurd-i386'
> > > ignore unless $deps_arch =~ $arch;
> > > 
> > > Looks like 'hurd-i386' matches 'i386' :)
> > 
> > Why don't you use eq instead of =~ (or whatever is the syntax in the
> > language of the script in question)?
> 
> Because $deps_arch might have been '!foo !bar !blubb'.

Why not parse that one part at a time, accounting for prefixes as well,
then? :)

(Maybe it's done now? I saw some commits, but didn't look into them...)

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.