Bug#171405: qa.debian.org: packages.qa.debian.org hasn't updated package ages recently
Ken Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The "Testing Status" sections on packages.qa.debian.org don't seem to > have updated their ages since (or anything else in the "testing status" > field) since Nov. 19, 2002. This was before the fire that destroyed > satie.debian.org. Testing scripts are disabled -> no updates. -- bye Joerg Aquariophile: welches debian/ welche xfree version? woody Xfree version 86 pgpxINYuUPcWY.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#171405: marked as done (qa.debian.org: packages.qa.debian.org hasn't updated package ages recently)
Your message dated Mon, 2 Dec 2002 12:51:13 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#171405: qa.debian.org: packages.qa.debian.org hasn't updated package ages recently has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2002 07:42:46 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 02 01:42:46 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from velocipede.dcn.davis.ca.us (mail.omsoft.com) [168.150.193.10] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18IlE6-O6-00; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 01:42:46 -0600 Received: from kabloom.dnsalias.com (dcn239-7.dcn.davis.ca.us [168.150.239.7]) by mail.omsoft.com (8.11.4/8.11.4/Omsoft) with ESMTP id gB27ghm19141; Sun, 1 Dec 2002 23:42:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from bloom by kabloom.dnsalias.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18Il9G-000106-00; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 23:37:46 -0800 From: Ken Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: qa.debian.org: packages.qa.debian.org hasn't updated package ages recently X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2002 23:37:46 -0800 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Ken Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: qa.debian.org Version: N/A; reported 2002-12-01 Severity: important The "Testing Status" sections on packages.qa.debian.org don't seem to have updated their ages since (or anything else in the "testing status" field) since Nov. 19, 2002. This was before the fire that destroyed satie.debian.org. Here is the relevant portion of lynx -dump performed on the glibc page on packages.qa.debian.org Testing Status Too young, only 0 of 10 days old locales/alpha unsatisfiable Depends: glibc-2.3.1-5 locales/arm unsatisfiable Depends: glibc-2.3.1-5 locales/hppa unsatisfiable Depends: glibc-2.3.1-5 locales/ia64 unsatisfiable Depends: glibc-2.3.1-5 locales/m68k unsatisfiable Depends: glibc-2.3.1-5 locales/mips unsatisfiable Depends: glibc-2.3.1-5 locales/mipsel unsatisfiable Depends: glibc-2.3.1-5 locales/powerpc unsatisfiable Depends: glibc-2.3.1-5 locales/s390 unsatisfiable Depends: glibc-2.3.1-5 locales/sparc unsatisfiable Depends: glibc-2.3.1-5 [174]libc6-dbg (arm, hppa, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc) is buggy! (1 > 0) [175]libc6 (arm, hppa, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc) is buggy! (8 > 1) [176]libc6-sparc64 (sparc) is (less) buggy! (1 <= 1) [177]glibc (source) is buggy! (1 > 0) Not considered Latest News [2002-11-19] [178]Accepted glibc 2.3.1-5 (i386 source all) [2002-11-18] [179]Accepted glibc 2.3.1-4 (i386 source all) [2002-10-21] [180]Accepted glibc 2.3.1-3 (i386 source all) [2002-10-20] [181]Accepted glibc 2.3.1-2 (i386 source all) . . . -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux kabloom.dnsalias.com 2.4.18-bf2.4 #1 Son Apr 14 09:53:28 CEST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C --- Received: (at 171405-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2002 11:51:49 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 02 05:51:48 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from a1-2.ppp10.hrnet.fr (buxy.ouaza.com) [212.94.201.10] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18Ip73-Jd-00; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 05:51:46 -0600 Received: by buxy.ouaza.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0141721E44; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 12:51:13 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 12:51:13 +0100 From: Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Ken Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Bug#171405: qa.debian.org: packages.qa.debian.org hasn't updated package ages recently Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-16.7 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.4
Procura-se Profissionais!
Empresa multinacional está contratando interessados com internet, para trabalhar em período parcial ou integral com altos ganhos. Se interessar acesse: www.megatrends-on-line.cjb.net Marcia Nota: Caso não queira mais receber nossas mensagens, retorne este e-mail com o título: REMOVER.
Bug#171405: qa.debian.org: packages.qa.debian.org hasn't updated package ages recently
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:51:13PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Le Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 10:13:24AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert ?crivait: > > Ken Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > The "Testing Status" sections on packages.qa.debian.org don't seem to > > > have updated their ages since (or anything else in the "testing status" > > > field) since Nov. 19, 2002. This was before the fire that destroyed > > > satie.debian.org. > > > > Testing scripts are disabled -> no updates. > > Exactly, that's why you could have closed the bug yourself ... :) > (I'm closing it with this mail) > When will these scripts be re-enabled?
Bug#171405: qa.debian.org: packages.qa.debian.org hasn't updated package ages recently
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 07:49:15AM -0800, Ken Bloom wrote: > On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:51:13PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > Le Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 10:13:24AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert ?crivait: > > > Testing scripts are disabled -> no updates. > > > > Exactly, that's why you could have closed the bug yourself ... :) > > (I'm closing it with this mail) > > When will these scripts be re-enabled? Probably when glibc is fixed so that it's not holding up 99% of unstable any more. (At the moment, even if the testing scripts were running, very little would actually happen.) The testing scripts are operated by the release manager. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnomeMeeting 0.12.2 versus 0.85.1
Hi, $upstream = "Damien Sandras" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I am the maintainer of GnomeMeeting and recently $upstream contacted me and told me only version 0.12.2 of GnomeMeeting was available in stable && testing while 0.85.x has been released since and (long?) before latest 'stable' was released. Now I too am wondering why 0.85 never made it into stable / testing. I might have a clue tho. Since $upstream switched to Gnome2 with v0.9x releases of GnomeMeeting while I was still packaging v0.8x releases of GnomeMeeting, I decided it would not be nice to force all users of GnomeMeeting to switch to the Gnome2 version while Gnome2 at that time was very unstable and expirimental, so I created a new package called gnomemeeting2, which surprisingly brought people the Gnome2 version. At later stages of development, Gnome2 became more and more stable, and $upstream didn't work on the Gnome1 version of GnomeMeeting anymore, so bugs didn't get fixed, I decided to repackage the 'gnomemeeting' package with the Gnome2 version of GnomeMeeting and asked for the deletion of gnomemeeting2 from the archive. So it happened. Maybe this switch has to do with GnomeMeeting 0.85.1 not being in testing/stable? For example, if I check on auric: | [18:29] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] % madison gnomemeeting | gnomemeeting | 0.93.1-3 | unstable | alpha, arm, hppa, ia64, | m68k, powerpc, s390, sparc | gnomemeeting | 0.94.1-1 | unstable | source, i386 | [18:29] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] % It only lists unstable... Now, what I want to ask: Is it possible to get GnomeMeeting 0.85.1 in testing and maybe even stable? It has quite alot of bugfixes from $upstream, and even some package improvements and overal, GnomeMeeting 0.85.1 is better at supporting converstations with NetMeeting and other (newer) versions of GnomeMeeting. So, what do I need to do to get GnomeMeeting 0.85.x in testing and maybe even stable? I myself, and Damien think it's better for Debian to have v0.85.x. Please let me know. I am subscribed to this list. With regards, Sander Smeenk. -- | The brain is a wonderful organ; it starts working the moment you get up | in the morning, and does not stop until you get to work. | 1024D/08CEC94D - 34B3 3314 B146 E13C 70C8 9BDB D463 7E41 08CE C94D
Bug#171405: qa.debian.org: packages.qa.debian.org hasn't updated package ages recently
Package: qa.debian.org Version: N/A; reported 2002-12-01 Severity: important The "Testing Status" sections on packages.qa.debian.org don't seem to have updated their ages since (or anything else in the "testing status" field) since Nov. 19, 2002. This was before the fire that destroyed satie.debian.org. Here is the relevant portion of lynx -dump performed on the glibc page on packages.qa.debian.org Testing Status Too young, only 0 of 10 days old locales/alpha unsatisfiable Depends: glibc-2.3.1-5 locales/arm unsatisfiable Depends: glibc-2.3.1-5 locales/hppa unsatisfiable Depends: glibc-2.3.1-5 locales/ia64 unsatisfiable Depends: glibc-2.3.1-5 locales/m68k unsatisfiable Depends: glibc-2.3.1-5 locales/mips unsatisfiable Depends: glibc-2.3.1-5 locales/mipsel unsatisfiable Depends: glibc-2.3.1-5 locales/powerpc unsatisfiable Depends: glibc-2.3.1-5 locales/s390 unsatisfiable Depends: glibc-2.3.1-5 locales/sparc unsatisfiable Depends: glibc-2.3.1-5 [174]libc6-dbg (arm, hppa, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc) is buggy! (1 > 0) [175]libc6 (arm, hppa, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc) is buggy! (8 > 1) [176]libc6-sparc64 (sparc) is (less) buggy! (1 <= 1) [177]glibc (source) is buggy! (1 > 0) Not considered Latest News [2002-11-19] [178]Accepted glibc 2.3.1-5 (i386 source all) [2002-11-18] [179]Accepted glibc 2.3.1-4 (i386 source all) [2002-10-21] [180]Accepted glibc 2.3.1-3 (i386 source all) [2002-10-20] [181]Accepted glibc 2.3.1-2 (i386 source all) . . . -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux kabloom.dnsalias.com 2.4.18-bf2.4 #1 Son Apr 14 09:53:28 CEST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
