Processed: tags
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 69110 pending Bug#69110: tclx8.0.4_8.0.4-1(unstable): Missing build dependencies Tags added: pending > tags 104894 pending Bug#104894: Build failure on hppa (at least) Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Re: ddts: notification about it translation of the lilo-config description
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 08:41:36AM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote: > On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 08:04:39AM -0500, Colin Watson wrote: > > Can these please be turned off by maintainer (debian-qa@lists.debian.org > > or [EMAIL PROTECTED]), not by package? New packages become > > maintained by QA all the time. > > I have not add this feature now. > > But I read this list and if I find a notification, I add this package > on the server list myself. That's very unreliable, and I'll bet you'll often miss them. That still leaves us with being spammed by the first one for each package, too, and debian-qa gets enough mail when a package enters its maintainership. > Where can I get a uptoday list of all qa packages? Search the Packages files for either possible maintainer address. I strongly encourage you to add support for NONOTIFICATION [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead, though, as that would alleviate a lot of people's annoyances with the ddts - from a brief look at the code, it looks like a matter of adding the maintainer address to the database plus a couple of extra lines of parsing code. Also, remember that if you won't do this you have to take packages out of the no-notification list again when they stop being maintained by QA. In general your system doesn't cope very well when maintainers change, because the preference is almost always on a per-maintainer basis rather than on a per-package basis. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ddts: notification about it translation of the lilo-config description
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 03:28:44PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 08:41:36AM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 08:04:39AM -0500, Colin Watson wrote: > > > Can these please be turned off by maintainer (debian-qa@lists.debian.org > > > or [EMAIL PROTECTED]), not by package? New packages become > > > maintained by QA all the time. > > > > I have not add this feature now. > > > > But I read this list and if I find a notification, I add this package > > on the server list myself. > > That's very unreliable, and I'll bet you'll often miss them. That still > leaves us with being spammed by the first one for each package, too, and > debian-qa gets enough mail when a package enters its maintainership. yes you are right... > > Where can I get a uptoday list of all qa packages? > > Search the Packages files for either possible maintainer address. I > strongly encourage you to add support for NONOTIFICATION > [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead, though, as that would alleviate a lot of > people's annoyances with the ddts - from a brief look at the code, it > looks like a matter of adding the maintainer address to the database > plus a couple of extra lines of parsing code. > > Also, remember that if you won't do this you have to take packages out > of the no-notification list again when they stop being maintained by QA. > In general your system doesn't cope very well when maintainers change, > because the preference is almost always on a per-maintainer basis rather > than on a per-package basis. ok, this is a 'right way' of the nonotification. I will code this... Gruss Grisu -- Michael Bramer - a Debian Linux Developer http://www.debian.org PGP: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Linux Sysadmin -- Use Debian Linux Koeln ist wie Unix, Duesseldorf eher wie DOS. pgpnmIR43h2tw.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: ddts: notification about it translation of the lilo-config description
On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 12:10:44AM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 03:28:44PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote: > > Search the Packages files for either possible maintainer address. I > > strongly encourage you to add support for NONOTIFICATION > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead, though, as that would alleviate a lot of > > people's annoyances with the ddts - from a brief look at the code, it > > looks like a matter of adding the maintainer address to the database > > plus a couple of extra lines of parsing code. [...] > ok, this is a 'right way' of the nonotification. I will code this... Thank you! -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#114246: marked as done (kdegraphics: failed to build on m68k)
Your message dated Wed, 3 Oct 2001 22:07:43 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#114246: kdegraphics: failed to build on m68k has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Oct 2001 22:04:27 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 02 17:04:27 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from pop3.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.40] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15oXeM-Xu-00; Tue, 02 Oct 2001 17:04:27 -0500 Received: from rock.dezevensprong.local (D5E0928A.kabel.telenet.be [213.224.146.138]) by pop3.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id E10EF9BFA9 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 3 Oct 2001 00:03:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from rock.dezevensprong.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rock.dezevensprong.local (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -1) with ESMTP id f92M3odw015543 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 3 Oct 2001 00:03:51 +0200 Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by rock.dezevensprong.local (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -1) with ESMTP id f92M3kKr015539 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 3 Oct 2001 00:03:46 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: rock.dezevensprong.local: wouter owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 00:03:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kdegraphics: failed to build on m68k Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: kdegraphics Version: 4:2.2.1-1 Severity: serious Looks like a typo to me. From the build log: Automatic build of kdegraphics_4:2.2.1-1 on arrakis by sbuild/m68k 1.159 Build started at 20011002-2237 ** [...] Makefile.in defines DEPDIR. This means you're using automake > 1.4 - this is not supported! doc/Makefile.in defines DEPDIR. This means you're using automake > 1.4 - this is not supported! doc/kdvi/Makefile.in defines DEPDIR. This means you're using automake > 1.4 - this is not supported! doc/kfract/Makefile.in defines DEPDIR. This means you're using automake > 1.4 - this is not supported! doc/kghostview/Makefile.in defines DEPDIR. This means you're using automake > 1.4 - this is not supported! doc/kiconedit/Makefile.in defines DEPDIR. This means you're using automake > 1.4 - this is not supported! doc/kpaint/Makefile.in defines DEPDIR. This means you're using automake > 1.4 - this is not supported! doc/kruler/Makefile.in defines DEPDIR. This means you're using automake > 1.4 - this is not supported! [lotsa these warnings snipped...] make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/kdegraphics-2.2.1/kviewshell' /usr/bin/moc ./kviewpart.h -o kviewpart.moc source='kviewpart.cpp' object='kviewpart.lo' libtool=yes \\ /bin/sh: \: command not found make[3]: *** [kviewpart.lo] Error 127 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/kdegraphics-2.2.1/kviewshell' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/kdegraphics-2.2.1' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/kdegraphics-2.2.1' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20011002-2336 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] NOTE: The package could have used binaries from the following packages (access time changed) without a source dependency: xlib6g-dev: /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so [...] If you need it, a full build log can be found at http://fremen-os.dyndns.org/arrakis/buildd/logs/kdegraphics_4:2.2.1-1_20011002-2237 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 iD8DBQE7ujnAWgZ1HEtaPf0RAmlRAJ9jmJU++0b/RStCfEVZzmIJaLn51gCfZXMO YD3QtmYo5SuMeeCGbi8zPmI= =1/x2 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 114246-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2001 04:12:30 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 03 23:12:30 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from barry.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.25] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15ozs3-00020A-00; Wed, 03 Oct 2001 23:12:27 -0500 Received: from tootie.covert.tdyc.com (pool-63.50.170.6.dnvr.grid.net [63.50.170.6]) by barry.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA2887
