Re: Request to join the Python Modules Packaging Team
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 22:39 +0100, Tim Michelsen wrote: > Hi! > I'd like to offer my support related to scientific python packages: > * Spyder > * scikits.timeseries > * scikits.hydroclimpy > * scikits.pystatsmodels > > I have already started to push some to Ubuntu: > > * PPA: > https://launchpad.net/~pythonxy/+archive/individual-releases > > * and REVU: > http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/spyder > > The Ubuntu MOTUs require that the packages land first in Debian. In my comment on REVU I stated "I would suggest..."! By no means is it a "requirement" to get your package into Debian first. However from my own past experiences IMHO you would get better, more timely reviews of your package by joining PAPT and PMPT. Best regards Charlie Smotherman (porthose) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Joining DPMT
I would like to join DPMT to co-maintian the package pylirc. I am a member of PAPT and maintain quickplay, upnp-inspector there already. My login is cjsmo-guest Thank you Charlie Smotherman (porthose) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Please remove Pycasa from PAPT
POX would you please remove pycasa from PAPT. The upstream author has decided to maintain the package. It has never been uploaded so it is safe to remove it. Thanks porthose -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikgkh0ncjwnfbprfyeblrzvrr6cyfbeph-sb...@mail.gmail.com
Re: How does team maintenace of python module works?
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Thomas Kluyver wrote: > On 19 February 2013 17:55, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> >> Thomas Kluyver >> Seems to be ok with migrating to Git (so, option D) > > > I voted CDBA in the same e-mail that I introduced the poll ;-). Thanks for > summarising the votes. > > Including Piotr & Andreas, and putting people whose opinion you've described > into the nearest possible vote would give us first preference votes: > > D: 4 (migration to git) > C: 3 (allow git) > E: 2 (migration to bzr) > F: 2 (migration to hg) > A: 1 (maintain status quo) - I thought there were some more, but I'm too > tired to go back through the thread at present. > > Using alternative voting, knock out A (and B, which had no first preference > votes): > > D: 4 > C: 3 > F: 3 > E: 2 > > After that it gets tricky, because we'd knock E out next, but the I'm not > sure where the votes counted for E (Scott & Barry) should be reallocated. If > we plough ahead regardless by dropping them, it ends up with a 4-4 draw > between D (migration to git) and C (allowing git and svn). Perhaps we can > get more votes, or more fallback preferences from people who've only > expressed their first preference. > > Thomas here is my $.02 worth EA -- Charlie Smotherman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cal_xwdb9vludb70s4txvm4svo2wqkhuy_av9y9uev9f5jfy...@mail.gmail.com
