Re: filing bug reports on 2002-10-14 to remove above packages from unstable
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Who do you think you are? Why do you think you can manage the work of another > developer without keeping in touch with him? Who told you i was not working on > that package? Did you made other assumption that i should know? Err, calm down. There's a 21 old day bug in the BTS against your package which has been severity grave for over 2 weeks. There's zero response from you in the BTS. A NMU to DELAYED is anything but out of order. Take your frustration out on someone or something else... -- James
Re: Bug#197875: python2.3: module dbm is missing
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Encolpe DEGOUTE writes: >> Package: python2.3 >> Version: 2.2.104-1beta1.1 >> Severity: important >> Tags: sid >> >> Module dbm.so is missing in sid build. > > That's correct. The db1 compat headers aren't available anymore. Is > there really a need to have this module? why not use the anydbm module > (or explicitely the bsddb module). > > It could be build using the gdbm module, but this would add another > dependency on an optional library package (gdbm). Well that's a dependency perl already has so it's not necessarily a problem (at least from a 'priority' point of view - I'm not sure if that's what you meant by optional). -- James
