RFS: json-py (updated package)
Dear mentors and Pythonistas, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.4-4 of my package "json-py". It builds these binary packages: python-json - a JSON (http://json.org) reader and writer in Python The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 493796 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/json-py - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/json-py/json-py_3.4-4.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, -- Daniel Watkins (Odd_Bloke) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: json-py (updated package)
Hi Piotr, On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:27:32 +0200 Piotr Ożarowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Daniel Watkins, 2008-08-21] > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.4-4 > > of my package "json-py". > > uploaded. Please contact release managers about unblocking it > (note that -3 didn't propagate to testing) Thanks for your sponsorship (once again). I'm not totally convinced that it is worth requesting a freeze exception (which I assume is what you're talking about) as the changes between -2 and -4 are almost entirely concerned with the packaging (there are no modifications to the functionality of the installed package) and no bugs have been closed by -3 or -4 (with the exception of the adoption bug). If, however, you think there would be value, I would be more than happy to defer to the greater experience and go ahead and request the exception. Regards, -- Daniel Watkins (Odd_Bloke) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
RFS: configobj (updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.5.3-1 of my package "configobj". It builds these binary packages: python-configobj - a simple but powerful config file reader and writer for Python The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 493792 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/configobj - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/configobj/configobj_4.5.3-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Regards, -- Daniel Watkins (Odd_Bloke) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
RFS: gwibber
Dear mentors and Pythonistas, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gwibber". * Package name: gwibber Version : 0.1~bzr102-1 Upstream Author : Ryan Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : https://launchpad.net/gwibber * License : GPL Section : misc It builds these binary packages: gwibber- microblogging client for GNOME The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 496326 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gwibber - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gwibber/gwibber_0.1~bzr102-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Regards, -- Daniel Watkins (Odd_Bloke) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: gwibber
Hi Piotr, On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 01:20:17 +0200 Piotr Ożarowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [I just took a quick look at the package, I'm still on VAC] Thanks! I've realised that I shouldn't have requested sponsorship for this yet, because one of its dependencies is still an ITP. I'm chasing that up, and will include the changes mentioned below in the package for which I eventually seek sponsorship. > [Daniel Watkins, 2008-09-02 23:08] > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gwibber". > > PAPT is in Uploaders so you can add the package to our TODO list[1] > and/or ping us on #debian-python Will do, as per above. > from homepage: > | Please note that this is pre-alpha software > > are you sure you want to upload it to unstable? How about > experimental? Well, I've been using it regularly without issue, so I'd have no qualms about it going into unstable. > Did you contact Jorge and ask him about co-maintaining this package? I did not. Jorge contacted me, having seen my ITP. His intent is to derive the Ubuntu packaging in future from the Debian packaging. > Vcs-* fields are missing, python2.5 is hardcoded in debian/control > (you probably want "python (>= 2.5)") Fixed. Dan -- Daniel Watkins (Odd_Bloke) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
