Re: numpydoc 1.6.0 available on salsa
Hi Chiara On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 19:39, Chiara Marmo wrote: > upstream kindly fixed the failing test in numpydoc for python 3.12 [1][2] and > I have patched the 1.6.0 version > Still autopkgetest is failing [3] because of an obsolete version of > python3-tabulate. > This is also stopping the upgrade of pandas [4]. > Tabulate has been updated on salsa but not uploaded yet. > > Is someone with upload rights available to upload tabulate? > This will help a lot I've uploaded python-tabulate/0.8.10-1 and numpydoc/1.6.0-1. Once both packages are built, we'll be able to trigger the autopkgtests in unstable to confirm whether the issue with Python 3.12 is resolved. Regards Graham
Re: numpydoc 1.6.0 available on salsa
Thank you so much Graham! Best Chiara On Monday, January 15, 2024, Graham Inggs wrote: > Hi Chiara > > On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 19:39, Chiara Marmo wrote: >> upstream kindly fixed the failing test in numpydoc for python 3.12 [1][2] and I have patched the 1.6.0 version >> Still autopkgetest is failing [3] because of an obsolete version of python3-tabulate. >> This is also stopping the upgrade of pandas [4]. >> Tabulate has been updated on salsa but not uploaded yet. >> >> Is someone with upload rights available to upload tabulate? >> This will help a lot > > I've uploaded python-tabulate/0.8.10-1 and numpydoc/1.6.0-1. > Once both packages are built, we'll be able to trigger the > autopkgtests in unstable to confirm whether the issue with Python 3.12 > is resolved. > > Regards > Graham > > -- GPG Key ID: ed25519/7611FA19766900CD Fingerprint FD45 A232 211E DE9F 23E9 DDD5 7611 FA19 7669 00CD
Request to join the Debian Python Team
Hello, I would like to request membership of the Debian Python Team. For a while, I have been working on a package for Shed Skin (shedskin) which is a compiler for a dialect of Python. I previously maintained a package for this software in the Python 2 era, and since it has been made compatible with Python 3, I feel that it would be beneficial to Debian users to have convenient access to it once again. To this end, I filed an "intent to package" report a while back: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1051352 The principal developer of Shed Skin is very encouraging of packaging efforts and has been responsive to feedback about issues that might otherwise incur distribution-level patches. Personally, I think that the software deserves more exposure, especially when considering some of the transformative effects it has on some kinds of Python code: http://shed-skin.blogspot.com/2024/01/fast-doom-wad-renderer-in-999-lines-of.html I have sought to follow advice provided in the team policy, making a Salsa project available here: https://salsa.debian.org/pboddie/shedskin Building on experience with a previous repository (noted in the ITP report), I have hopefully managed to follow the branching and pristine-tar guidelines, also introducing test running using Salsa CI. I have read and accept the policy published here: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/blob/master/ policy.rst My Salsa login is pboddie. Thanks in advance for any guidance that might be offered! Paul
