PyQt6 backport for oldstable?

2024-01-07 Thread c.buhtz
Hello,

might there be a realistic chance that PyQt6 will be released in the
"oldstable-backports" repo?

Upstream-Support of PyQt5 is off. But there are some "oldstable" users
out there not able to upgrade to PyQt6 or depending applications.

Kind
Christian



Re: PyQt6 backport for oldstable?

2024-01-07 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi Christian!

On Sun, Jan 07, 2024 at 03:30:28PM +, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote:
> Hello,
>
> might there be a realistic chance that PyQt6 will be released in the
> "oldstable-backports" repo?
>
> Upstream-Support of PyQt5 is off. But there are some "oldstable" users
> out there not able to upgrade to PyQt6 or depending applications.

I am sorry but I don't have any time for oldstable backports.

However, if you or someone else wants to do this work, I won't mind at all.

In addition to PyQt6 itself, the following packages will need to be
backported:

- sip6 (although, it may conflict with sip5 from oldstable)
- pyqt-builder
- pyqt6-sip

--
Dmitry Shachnev


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


numpydoc 1.6.0 available on salsa

2024-01-07 Thread Chiara Marmo
Dear list,

I have uploaded to salsa numpydoc 1.6.0.
The new upstream version removes setup.py: rules and control are updated
accordingly.

I have xfailed the failing test [1] and confirmed the failure upstream [2].

Let me know if some else is needed.
Thanks for your attention,
best,

Chiara

[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1056431
[2] https://github.com/numpy/numpydoc/issues/512

-- 
GPG Key ID: ed25519/7611FA19766900CD
Fingerprint FD45 A232 211E DE9F 23E9  DDD5 7611 FA19 7669 00CD


Re: numpydoc 1.6.0 available on salsa

2024-01-07 Thread Chiara Marmo
Apparently, I need some more time to understand why autopkgtest is
failing...
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/numpydoc/-/jobs/5128447

Chiara

On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 7:02 PM Chiara Marmo  wrote:

> Dear list,
>
> I have uploaded to salsa numpydoc 1.6.0.
> The new upstream version removes setup.py: rules and control are updated
> accordingly.
>
> I have xfailed the failing test [1] and confirmed the failure upstream [2].
>
> Let me know if some else is needed.
> Thanks for your attention,
> best,
>
> Chiara
>
> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1056431
> [2] https://github.com/numpy/numpydoc/issues/512
>
> --
> GPG Key ID: ed25519/7611FA19766900CD
> Fingerprint FD45 A232 211E DE9F 23E9  DDD5 7611 FA19 7669 00CD
>