Re: review for lazy-loader/0.3-1

[Bo YU]

Hi!

On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 1:24 AM Jeroen Ploemen  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I took a look at lazy-loader, up for sponsorship in the Python Team:
>
> * copyright: years outdated;
> * control: long description would benefit from some more details
>   explaining what lazy loader is and does, e.g. a summary of [1];
> * control: standards-version is slightly out-of-date;
> * watch: upstream uses signed tags for releases, please add the
>   upstream key in the packaging and make uscan verify the signature.
>   Since the watch file already uses git mode, you might only have to
>   add the pgpmode=gittag option once the upstream key is in place for
>   verification to work.
>
> Please re-add the package to the channel topic on IRC once the above
> issues have been fixed.
>
Thanks for uploading it.  All issues should be fixed except d/conftrol
to improve
description and thanks with your help here. In addition to pabs help
me to find upstream
key file here and thanks too.:)

BR,
Bo
>
> [1]https://scientific-python.org/specs/spec-0001/ standards-version

Re: dask.distributed RC bug #1042135

[Julian Gilbey]

Hi Diane,

On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 10:05:53AM -0700, Diane Trout wrote:
> > > 
> > 
> > Thanks so much!  I see you've already started on dask :)
> > 
> > I took at quick look at arrow - yikes!  There is potentially work
> > afoot on this though:
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=970021
> > 
> 
> Dask & dask.distributed 2023.8.0 was easier to update than some of the
> other versions they had between 2022.12 and now.
> 
> Dask would still benifit from pyarrow, by I added enough
> pytest.importorskip to avoid triggering the tests that depend on
> pyarrow.
> 
> It also looks like it builds for me and the debian builder so I closed
> 1042135.
> 
> Hopefully that helps. (And it looks like it's got some code for pandas
> 2.0 so hopefully that'll help Rebecca Palmer.

That's fantastic - thank you so much!

:-)

   Julian