On 2022-10-06 21 h 43, Paul Wise wrote:
On Fri, 2022-10-07 at 00:10 +0200, Gordon Ball wrote:
* Upload to unstable and see what breaks?
The experimental pseudo-excuses already say several packages break:
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?experimental=1&package=pyyaml
autopkgtest for ganeti/3.0.2-1: amd64: Regression, arm64: Regression
autopkgtest for llvm-toolchain-13/1:13.0.1-7: amd64: Pass, arm64: Regression
autopkgtest for satpy/0.37.1-1: amd64: Regression, arm64: Regression
autopkgtest for spades/3.15.5+dfsg-1: amd64: Regression
So at least these issues need to be investigated and maybe bugs filed.
* Request an archive rebuild with this version and see what breaks?
Definitely.
* File bugs against all likely affected packages with a fixed date for
an upload?
Definitely.
Shameless plug here, but if you do it in time for the DPT sprint
(December 2-3-4), fixing packages that broke can even be an agenda item
people can work on!
https://deb.li/2S8U
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org
⠈⠳⣄
OpenPGP_0xE1E5457C8BAD4113.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature