Re: RFS: tpm2-pytss

2022-09-08 Thread Claudius Heine

Hi,

On 2022-09-05 21:18, Carsten Schoenert wrote:

Hello Claudius,

Am 05.09.22 um 14:26 schrieb Claudius Heine:

The link I posted is already in the DPT namespace:

  https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/tpm2-pytss

Since I am no a member of the team, I wanted to move it over, but it
already existed, but was completely empty. So I just pushed my changes
there.


ahh, o.k, I haven't seen this.
I've take now this repo as base for the initial upload, now we need to 
wait for the ftpmaster to process this package.


https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/tpm2-pytss_1.2.0-1.html


Thanks!

Related to this, I would like to update the tpm2-pkcs11 package, which 
is not part of the DPT, but the new version depends on that package.


Do I need to wait until the tpm2-pytss package is available on unstable 
before doing this, or can this be done in parallel?


regards,
Claudius



Re: RFS: tpm2-pytss

2022-09-08 Thread Carsten Schoenert

Hello Claudius,

Am 08.09.22 um 13:37 schrieb Claudius Heine:


Related to this, I would like to update the tpm2-pkcs11 package, which
is not part of the DPT, but the new version depends on that package.

Do I need to wait until the tpm2-pytss package is available on unstable
before doing this, or can this be done in parallel?


from a technical side it would be no problem, the buildd's simply 
couldn't build this package due the dep chain.


But I try to avoid such uploads and wait for required depending packages.
First, it helps me to have some better overview of my or team related 
packages. If the package isn't visible here I know there is some work left.
Second, other user who doesn't know all related things might wondering 
why the uploaded new version isn't build. This can be confusing.


And third, in this case here, the upload would be a NMU if the 
maintainer of tpm2-pkcs11 [1] might not react on bug reports or emails.


So, a general suggestion in my eyes is to get always in contact with the 
package maintainers of tpm2-pkcs11, which you have done so far through 
#1011376 [2].
You can prepare and provide an MR on Salsa so the package could be easy 
updated by the original maintainers and write about within the issue 
tracking.



[1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/tpm2-pkcs11
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011376

--
Regards
Carsten