Re: [RFS] RadioTray
Hallo, thanks for the hints. I have checked through all bugs, which are referenced in the removal log for radiotray. The reason of removal and most other bugs are fixed during porting radiotray to python 3, or are not longer reproducible. The details are documented at: https://github.com/Borim7/radio-tray/issues/7 In the instructions from "Reintroducing packages" one point is to update or reopen old bugs. Should this also be done, although the radiotray package is still removed? I hesitate to do it, because it is a little bit weird to open bug reports for something, that is no longer part of Debian. Regards Matthias Am 05.01.22 um 05:15 schrieb Paul Wise: > On Tue, 2021-12-28 at 18:37 +0100, Matthias wrote: > >> but it would be great, if RadioTray will get back into the official >> Debian repository. > > Please note the extra steps required when reintroducing packages: > > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#reintroducing-pkgs > >> Is here someone, who is willing to sponsor RadioTray? > > If you don't get a response here, filing an RFS can sometimes work: > > https://mentors.debian.net/sponsors/rfs-howto/ >
ponyorm v0.7.15rc1, python3.10 and github releases
Hello! Upstream ponyorm released v0.7.15rc1, which adds python3.10 support and thus fixes #1000716. I ran a quick sbuild and the testsuite passes and everything seems good. Since it is team maintained, I'd have updated the package in unstable, but the latest pypi tarball changes the default carriage return, and creates a huge diff on the upstream branch. This causes some patches to fail to apply, etc. Would you mind if I migrated ponyorm to the github releases, using uscan's git mode? I've made a quick test and it does solves this issue :) Asking, since I'd be pretty upset if someone were to do the opposite on a package I team maintain :P Cheers, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [RFS] RadioTray
On Mon, 2022-01-10 at 20:57 +0100, Matthias wrote: > Should this also be done, although the radiotray package is still removed? Wait until after the package is accepted or at least in NEW. https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
