Re: Bug#967209: rgtk2: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye
Hi doko and Python folks, On 4 August 2020 at 09:29, Matthias Klose wrote: | Package: src:rgtk2 | Version: 2.20.36-2 | Severity: serious | Tags: sid bullseye | User: debian-python@lists.debian.org | Usertags: py2unversioned | | Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove | Python2 from the distribution, as discussed in | https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/07/msg00080.html | | We will keep some Python2 package as discussed in | https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2020/07/msg00039.html | but removing the unversioned python packages python-minimal, python, | python-dev, python-dbg, python-doc. | | Your package either build-depends, depends on one of those packages. | Please either convert these packages to Python3, or if that is not | possible, replaces the dependencies on the unversioned Python | packages with one of the python2 dependencies (python2, python2-dev, | python2-dbg, python2-doc). | | Please check for dependencies, build dependencies AND autopkg tests. I am lost. Build-Depends: Source: rgtk2 Section: gnu-r Priority: optional Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 10), dh-r (>= 20180615), r-base-dev (>= 3.6.1), libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.10.12), libglade2-dev, libpango1.0-dev, libcairo2-dev Standards-Version: 4.4.0 Vcs-Browser: https://salsa.debian.org/edd/r-cran-rgtk2 Vcs-Git: https://salsa.debian.org/edd/r-cran-rgtk2.git Homepage: https://cran.r-project.org/package=RGtk2 Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 10), dh-r (>= 20180615), r-base-dev (>= 3.6.1), libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.10.12), libglade2-dev, libpango1.0-dev, libcairo2-dev Depends: Package: r-cran-rgtk2 Source: rgtk2 (2.20.36-2) Version: 2.20.36-2+b1 Installed-Size: 18722 Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel Architecture: amd64 Depends: r-base-core (>= 4.0.0-3), r-api-4.0, libatk1.0-0 (>= 1.12.4), libc6 (>= 2.14), libcairo2 (>= 1.8.0), libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 (>= 2.22.0), libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.41.1), libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.20.0), libpango-1.0-0 (>= 1.25.5), libpangocairo-1.0-0 (>= 1.22.0) Description-en: GNU R binding for Gtk2 [...] Where is python coming in from, and what could I change? Is it libglade2 ? If we cannot change and must remove it that would be, I guess, defensible. The package and the related ones are a little end-of-life-ish, but have not yet been removed from CRAN either so there is need for imminent action for removal. We could remove it but that is likely to annoy a user or two, and "as users are our priority" I suggest to keep it ... but I need a helping hand here. | If there are questions, please refer to the wiki page for the removal: | https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal, or ask for help on IRC | #debian-python, or the debian-python@lists.debian.org mailing list. d-p CC'ed. Thanks, Dirk -- https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
Re: Bug#967209: rgtk2: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye
Hi, Le mardi 04 août 2020 à 07:49 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit : > Hi doko and Python folks, > > I am lost. > I suggest to check the shebangs. Cheers, JP
Re: Bug#967209: rgtk2: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye
block 967209 by 967157 thanks sorry, that's due to uninstallability of libglade2-dev. On 8/4/20 2:49 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > Hi doko and Python folks, > > On 4 August 2020 at 09:29, Matthias Klose wrote: > | Package: src:rgtk2 > | Version: 2.20.36-2 > | Severity: serious > | Tags: sid bullseye > | User: debian-python@lists.debian.org > | Usertags: py2unversioned > | > | Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove > | Python2 from the distribution, as discussed in > | https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/07/msg00080.html > | > | We will keep some Python2 package as discussed in > | https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2020/07/msg00039.html > | but removing the unversioned python packages python-minimal, python, > | python-dev, python-dbg, python-doc. > | > | Your package either build-depends, depends on one of those packages. > | Please either convert these packages to Python3, or if that is not > | possible, replaces the dependencies on the unversioned Python > | packages with one of the python2 dependencies (python2, python2-dev, > | python2-dbg, python2-doc). > | > | Please check for dependencies, build dependencies AND autopkg tests. > > I am lost. > > Build-Depends: > Source: rgtk2 > Section: gnu-r > Priority: optional > Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 10), dh-r (>= 20180615), r-base-dev (>= > 3.6.1), libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.10.12), libglade2-dev, libpango1.0-dev, > libcairo2-dev > Standards-Version: 4.4.0 > Vcs-Browser: https://salsa.debian.org/edd/r-cran-rgtk2 > Vcs-Git: https://salsa.debian.org/edd/r-cran-rgtk2.git > Homepage: https://cran.r-project.org/package=RGtk2 > > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 10), dh-r (>= 20180615), r-base-dev (>= 3.6.1), > libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.10.12), libglade2-dev, libpango1.0-dev, libcairo2-dev > > Depends: > Package: r-cran-rgtk2 > Source: rgtk2 (2.20.36-2) > Version: 2.20.36-2+b1 > Installed-Size: 18722 > Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel > Architecture: amd64 > Depends: r-base-core (>= 4.0.0-3), r-api-4.0, libatk1.0-0 (>= 1.12.4), > libc6 (>= 2.14), libcairo2 (>= 1.8.0), libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 (>= 2.22.0), > libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.41.1), libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.20.0), libpango-1.0-0 (>= > 1.25.5), libpangocairo-1.0-0 (>= 1.22.0) > Description-en: GNU R binding for Gtk2 > [...] > > Where is python coming in from, and what could I change? Is it libglade2 ? > > If we cannot change and must remove it that would be, I guess, defensible. > The package and the related ones are a little end-of-life-ish, but have not > yet been removed from CRAN either so there is need for imminent action for > removal. We could remove it but that is likely to annoy a user or two, and > "as users are our priority" I suggest to keep it ... but I need a helping > hand here. > > | If there are questions, please refer to the wiki page for the removal: > | https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal, or ask for help on IRC > | #debian-python, or the debian-python@lists.debian.org mailing list. > > d-p CC'ed. > > Thanks, Dirk >
Re: Bug#967209: rgtk2: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye
On 4 August 2020 at 15:06, Matthias Klose wrote: | block 967209 by 967157 | thanks | | sorry, that's due to uninstallability of libglade2-dev. Thanks, that makes sense. (And thanks also to Julien, that was a good idea too but it does come up negative: edd@rob:~/deb/rgtk2(master)$ grep -ri Python inst/doc/tutorial.sgml:bindings for many other languages including C, C++, Guile, Perl, Python, edd@rob:~/deb/rgtk2(master)$ Dirk | On 8/4/20 2:49 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > Hi doko and Python folks, | > | > On 4 August 2020 at 09:29, Matthias Klose wrote: | > | Package: src:rgtk2 | > | Version: 2.20.36-2 | > | Severity: serious | > | Tags: sid bullseye | > | User: debian-python@lists.debian.org | > | Usertags: py2unversioned | > | | > | Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove | > | Python2 from the distribution, as discussed in | > | https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/07/msg00080.html | > | | > | We will keep some Python2 package as discussed in | > | https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2020/07/msg00039.html | > | but removing the unversioned python packages python-minimal, python, | > | python-dev, python-dbg, python-doc. | > | | > | Your package either build-depends, depends on one of those packages. | > | Please either convert these packages to Python3, or if that is not | > | possible, replaces the dependencies on the unversioned Python | > | packages with one of the python2 dependencies (python2, python2-dev, | > | python2-dbg, python2-doc). | > | | > | Please check for dependencies, build dependencies AND autopkg tests. | > | > I am lost. | > | > Build-Depends: | > Source: rgtk2 | > Section: gnu-r | > Priority: optional | > Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel | > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 10), dh-r (>= 20180615), r-base-dev (>= 3.6.1), libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.10.12), libglade2-dev, libpango1.0-dev, libcairo2-dev | > Standards-Version: 4.4.0 | > Vcs-Browser: https://salsa.debian.org/edd/r-cran-rgtk2 | > Vcs-Git: https://salsa.debian.org/edd/r-cran-rgtk2.git | > Homepage: https://cran.r-project.org/package=RGtk2 | > | > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 10), dh-r (>= 20180615), r-base-dev (>= 3.6.1), libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.10.12), libglade2-dev, libpango1.0-dev, libcairo2-dev | > | > Depends: | > Package: r-cran-rgtk2 | > Source: rgtk2 (2.20.36-2) | > Version: 2.20.36-2+b1 | > Installed-Size: 18722 | > Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel | > Architecture: amd64 | > Depends: r-base-core (>= 4.0.0-3), r-api-4.0, libatk1.0-0 (>= 1.12.4), libc6 (>= 2.14), libcairo2 (>= 1.8.0), libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 (>= 2.22.0), libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.41.1), libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.20.0), libpango-1.0-0 (>= 1.25.5), libpangocairo-1.0-0 (>= 1.22.0) | > Description-en: GNU R binding for Gtk2 | > [...] | > | > Where is python coming in from, and what could I change? Is it libglade2 ? | > | > If we cannot change and must remove it that would be, I guess, defensible. | > The package and the related ones are a little end-of-life-ish, but have not | > yet been removed from CRAN either so there is need for imminent action for | > removal. We could remove it but that is likely to annoy a user or two, and | > "as users are our priority" I suggest to keep it ... but I need a helping | > hand here. | > | > | If there are questions, please refer to the wiki page for the removal: | > | https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal, or ask for help on IRC | > | #debian-python, or the debian-python@lists.debian.org mailing list. | > | > d-p CC'ed. | > | > Thanks, Dirk | > | -- https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
Re: Request to join Debian Python Team
Hi Juri (2020.07.29_13:08:48_+) > I read and accept the policies [1][2]. My Salsa username is gratuxri [3]. Welcome. Added you to PAPT and DPMT. SR -- Stefano Rivera http://tumbleweed.org.za/ +1 415 683 3272
Re: embedded-javascript-library usr/share/doc/python3-lmfit/html/_static/language_data.js please use sphinx
Hi, On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 03:04:38PM +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > Hello, I am working on the lmfit-py package > > lintian complain about this > > https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/lmfit-py/-/jobs/909498 > > I use sphinx, so my question is: do you know how to fix this issue I have just uploaded sphinx 2.4.3-5 where dh_sphinxdoc gained the ability to symlink language_data.js (for English), so this should be fixed. -- Dmitry Shachnev signature.asc Description: PGP signature