Re: DebConf20 @ Home -- Python Team Bof & Sprint ?
On 2020-06-24 21 h 13, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote: > Hello folks! > > As some of you might have seen, DebConf20 @ Home will be happening end > of August. > > I was wondering if others would be interested in having a Python Team > BoF to talk about ongoing work/issues (the Python 2 removals comes to my > mind but I'm sure there are other discussion-worthy topics). > > If there is interest, I'd be happy to submit something to the DebConf > Content team. > > Maybe it would also be good to set aside half a day during the conf > (preferably after the BoF) for a sprint to try and fix things? > > Cheers, > FWIW, I haven't sent a BoF proposal to the DebConf Content team yet, as I don't feel 3 people (including me) is enough to interest. If you'd like to see a Python BoF + Sprint happen during DebConf20@Home, please show your support. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: DebConf20 @ Home -- Python Team Bof & Sprint ?
Hi Louis-Philippe (2020.07.01_13:59:15_+) > If you'd like to see a Python BoF + Sprint happen during DebConf20@Home, > please show your support. Yes please. SR -- Stefano Rivera http://tumbleweed.org.za/ +1 415 683 3272
Re: Offer to help with packaging
Im working on python-language-server but looks like also depends on python-jsonrpc-server and I dont find any solution on Debian repositories. Any suggestion? p. El 6/28/20 a las 11:04 AM, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel escribió: > What about helping > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946035 > > > python-language-server > > is the only one missing now. > > cheers
Re: Offer to help with packaging
Hi Pablo, Pablo Mestre writes: > Im working on python-language-server Awesome, thank you :-) I expect it will be a popular package too! > but looks like also depends on python-jsonrpc-server and I dont find > any solution on Debian repositories. > > Any suggestion? > If you're committed to packaging python lsp, then set yourself as the owner of #96360, and retitle it, replacing "RFP" with "ITP". If the absence of a python-jsonrpc-server package is a blocker for #963605, and you want to work on it, then file an ITP for python-jsonrpc-server, set yourself as owner, and also set up a blocks relationship between the two bugs. Tools for doing this more conveniently are "bts" from devscripts, and "reportbug" for filing the ITP. IIRC bts requires an MTA (mail transport agent) and for this I'd recommend msmtp-mta, because most people find it easier to configure authentication with it than with Postfix, Exim, etc. If you'd like to do it manually for now, see: https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control If you use cont...@bugs.debian.org, please CC the bug's email. It's also possible to reply to a bug with this magic control server header: Control: command -1 arguments "-1" is a convenient alias for the bug number. For more info, see the man bts(1), the server-control documentation, and Developer's Reference: https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ Cheers, Nicholas signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Offer to help with packaging
Hi El 7/1/20 a las 10:58 PM, Nicholas D Steeves escribió: > Awesome, thank you :-) I expect it will be a popular package too! [.] > If you're committed to packaging python lsp, then set yourself as the > owner of #96360, and retitle it, replacing "RFP" with "ITP". Yes, I committed to packaging > If the absence of a python-jsonrpc-server package is a blocker for > #963605, and you want to work on it, then file an ITP for > python-jsonrpc-server, set yourself as owner, and also set up a blocks > relationship between the two bugs. You mean Control: block 946035 by -1 Control: block #[newcode] by -1 Something like this? > > Tools for doing this more conveniently are "bts" from devscripts, and > "reportbug" for filing the ITP. IIRC bts requires an MTA (mail > transport agent) and for this I'd recommend msmtp-mta, because most > people find it easier to configure authentication with it than with > Postfix, Exim, etc. > > If you'd like to do it manually for now, see: > https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control Ok Thanks for all P. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
