Re: git-dpm -> gbp conversion (mass-change) [phase 1 DONE]

[eamanu15]

Hello Everybody!

Its a good idea use gbp. Its more easy to use.

Are there some step by step of the use?

Regards!

El sáb., 11 de ago. de 2018 a la(s) 11:16, Scott Kitterman <
deb...@kitterman.com> escribió:

>
>
> On August 11, 2018 1:54:41 PM UTC, Ondrej Novy  wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >pá 10. 8. 2018 v 22:29 odesílatel Scott Kitterman
> >
> >napsal:
> >
> >> Thanks.  I'm glad more is going on than people arguing about what's
> >wrong
> >> with the tool we aren't going to use anymore.
> >>
> >
> >cool :).
> >
> >What branch layout did you use?
> >>
> >
> >I kept original branch names, renaming them is "phase 2".
>
> I hope you will stick with what's in the wiki:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackagingPQ#Git_Branch_Names
>
> That's what I've been following when I hand converted repositories of
> packages I was updating.
>
> Scott K
>
> --
Arias Emmanuel
https://www.linkedin.com/in/emmanuel-arias-437a6a8a
http://eamanu.com

Re: git-dpm -> gbp conversion (mass-change) [phase 1 DONE]

[Dmitry Shachnev]

Hi,

On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 10:20:53AM -0300, eamanu15 wrote:
> Hello Everybody!
>
> Its a good idea use gbp. Its more easy to use.
>
> Are there some step by step of the use?

There was a link in Scott’s mail:

https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackagingPQ

This page covers the most popular operations you would need to do.

--
Dmitry Shachnev


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug 903801: Python pika rc bug, expected close?

[Olivier Sallou]

Hi,

Any chance to close this bug before removal? I have some packages
depending on it.
If you don't have time to fix it, I can have a look and upload a fixed
package, should not be too difficult to fix.
Thanks

Olivier

-- 

gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438  (keyring.debian.org)
Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335  D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438