Re: PAPT migrated to Git on Salsa

[Hilmar Preuße]

On 24.02.2018 19:13, Stefano Rivera wrote:

Hi,

> I've finished migrating PAPT to Salsa
> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/applications
> 
> There are probably some packages in there that aren't actually team
> maintained any more. We should clean them up.
> 
In my project (rubber) I find 4 branches after migration. The first 3
are explained on [1] and [2]. What about branch "svn"? Can I assume it
to be obsolete and simply kill it?

Thanks,
  Hilmar

[1] https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackaging#git_workflows
[2] https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackagingPQ#Git_Branch_Names
-- 
#206401 http://counter.li.org



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Name of the upstream branch

[W. Martin Borgert]

Dear team,

https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackagingPQ#Git_Branch_Names
states:

"we are strongly recommending you use DEP-14 style branch names"

and below:

"upstream - The un-Debianized upstream source."

I ask to change the latter branch name to "upstream/latest",
first, because that's what DEP-14 says, and
second, because "upstream/" is necessary anyway in some
cases and is less confusing then.

Objections?

TIA from the ministry of silly bike shedding.