Re: Python 3 Statsmodels & Pandas
On 29/09/17 23:55, Diane Trout wrote:
I wonder if it's better to filter sphinxdoc out of the dh line, install
sphinx-common, or just always install python3-sphinx?
For local testing of this, use pbuilder --debbuildopts -B
Given earlier messages that we want this working ASAP, always installing
python3-sphinx is the lowest-risk option.
As for nose, python{,3}-nose is listed a build-depends ? Why
is it failing on importing nose? it should either be there or it
shouldn't be running tests?
It's not failing on importing nose - it's failing because the patch
tries to skip a test *without* importing nose.
Re: Python 3 Statsmodels & Pandas
On 29/09/17 23:55, Diane Trout wrote: On Fri, 2017-09-29 at 22:05 +0100, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: statsmodels passed NEW...and FTBFS with dh: unable to load addon sphinxdoc: Can't locate Debian/Debhelper/Sequence/sphinxdoc.pm in @INC That file is in the sphinx-common package, which suggests that at least some of the sphinx dependencies need to be Build-Depends and not just Build-Depends-Indep. Oops. I thought that it wouldn't try using sphinx when not building doc packages. But apparently being listed in "dh --with" counts as being used. I wonder if it's better to filter sphinxdoc out of the dh line, install sphinx-common, or just always install python3-sphinx? I have some ideas of what to do, I should be able to fix this soon. Either always install python3-sphinx (no harm in doing so), or use sphinx-common + python3-sphinx + nodoc guards in d/rules. There is no need for more complicated logic. Ghis
Re: Python 3 Statsmodels & Pandas
Hi Diane, On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 03:55:13PM -0700, Diane Trout wrote: > Oops. > > I thought that it wouldn't try using sphinx when not building doc > packages. But apparently being listed in "dh --with" counts as being > used. Yes, because dh tries to open Sequece/sphinxdoc.pm which is provided by sphinx-common. > I wonder if it's better to filter sphinxdoc out of the dh line, install > sphinx-common, or just always install python3-sphinx? Adding sphinx-common to B-D and keeping python3-sphinx in B-D-Indep is probably the easiest solution. Also you can try not relying on --with at all and manually call dh_sphinxdoc when the build is arch-indep. -- Dmitry Shachnev signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Updated Veusz
Hi - I'd be very grateful if somebody could review my updated Veusz package in the PAPT repository: https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/python-apps/packages/veusz/trunk/ I've updated it to Veusz 2.0.1. This upgrades to Qt5. I'm also building for python 2 and 3. It now uses sphinx docs. I've split apart the package into the main executable and docs (veusz, based on python3), the python packages (python-veusz and python3-veusz), the architecture-specific parts (python-veusz.helpers and python3-veusz.helpers) and the data shared by the modules (veusz-data) and debug packages (pythonX-veusz.helpers-dbg). This is a lot of subpackages. I could merge the pythonX-veusz and pythonX-veusz.helpers, if that would make it better at the expense of disk space. Presumably these should somehow obsolete the old veusz-helpers package, but I'm not sure how to do that, given that that used python2 and veusz now uses python3 by default. The source code is: https://github.com/veusz/veusz/releases/download/veusz-2.0.1/veusz-2.0.1.tar.gz signature: https://github.com/veusz/veusz/releases/download/veusz-2.0.1/veusz-2.0.1.tar.gz.asc Thanks very much in advance Jeremy
pycharm package in debian
Are there any plans to make a debian package of pycharm that is part of official debian? I used their community edition on windows 7 and it is awesome. thanks -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi | http://raju.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Blog
Re: pycharm package in debian
Fwiw I have made a pycharm-community-sloppy package available from NeuroDebian - just wrapped their distribution. Btw seems to work with open jdk just fine. Packaging for Debian proper would need some Java verse maintainer. On September 30, 2017 8:22:56 AM EDT, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: >Are there any plans to make a debian package of pycharm that is part >of official debian? I used their community edition on windows 7 and it >is awesome. > >thanks -- Sent from a phone which beats iPhone.
Re: pycharm package in debian
Hi, Le 30/09/2017 à 14:22, kamaraju kusumanchi a écrit : > Are there any plans to make a debian package of pycharm that is part > of official debian? I used their community edition on windows 7 and it > is awesome. Maybe you should look at WNPP to see if someone filed a RFP or ITP, and if not, submit a RFP yourself? Snark on #debian-python
Re: Python 3 Statsmodels & Pandas
On Sat, 2017-09-30 at 12:26 +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > > > > I wonder if it's better to filter sphinxdoc out of the dh line, > > install > > sphinx-common, or just always install python3-sphinx? > > Adding sphinx-common to B-D and keeping python3-sphinx in B-D-Indep > is > probably the easiest solution. Also you can try not relying on --with > at all and manually call dh_sphinxdoc when the build is arch-indep. > It took me two tries, but statsmodels 0.8.0-6 builds everywhere pandas builds now. I am curious if Rebecca is using pandas on a non-intel architecture though (was wondering how she noticed pandas hadn't built) Diane signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Python 3 Statsmodels & Pandas
On 30/09/17 16:50, Diane Trout wrote: I am curious if Rebecca is using pandas on a non-intel architecture though (was wondering how she noticed pandas hadn't built) No - I found this email thread and checked https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pandas
Re: pycharm package in debian
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 10:35 PM, Julien Puydt wrote: > Le 30/09/2017 à 14:22, kamaraju kusumanchi a écrit : >> Are there any plans to make a debian package of pycharm that is part >> of official debian? I used their community edition on windows 7 and it >> is awesome. > > Maybe you should look at WNPP to see if someone filed a RFP or ITP, and > if not, submit a RFP yourself? Looks like someone attempted it but gave up, so if you would like to do it that would be great. https://bugs.debian.org/742394 https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
