Re: python3 statsmodels?
On Tuesday, June 20, 2017, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:18 AM, kamaraju kusumanchi > > wrote: > > I see that there is no statsmodels package for python3 in Stretch. > > > > % apt-cache search statsmodels python3 > > python3-seaborn - statistical visualization library > > statsmodels is maintained by Debian science team > (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/statsmodels) so i suggest to contact > them directly (CCed them here) Why? Is there any specific reason? Wouldn't it make sense to bring everything under one umbrella. Raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi | http://raju.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Blog
Re: python3 statsmodels?
On Tuesday, June 20, 2017, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > > statsmodels is maintained by Debian science team > > (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/statsmodels) so i suggest to contact > > them directly (CCed them here) > > yeap -- would be lovely to have python3 build... debian/rules is quite > ad-hoc/elaborate but somewhat inline with how things are done for pandas > as well... I might look into it at some point (but not within upcoming 2 > weeks) but would even more appreciate help from the team mates or > outside contributors ;) > > I do not have enough know how to package it but it is a very useful package to do ols analysis. For now I installed conda which has this for python3. Also, what is the rationale for keeping this under debian-science instead of moving to say debian-python? Having all python packages in one team would make it more easy to collaborate? Raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi | http://raju.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Blog
Re: python3 statsmodels?
>> statsmodels is maintained by Debian science team >> (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/statsmodels) so i suggest to contact >> them directly (CCed them here) > > Why? Is there any specific reason? Wouldn't it make sense to bring > everything under one umbrella. because if you want to get an answer to your question you have to ask it to the right recipient. Currently statsmodels is maintained by another team, so the point of bring all under the same umbrella is out of topic. i suggest you to bring your ideas to the current maintainers (Yaroslav already replied, and more in general the Debian Science Team is the recipient you want to contact for statsmodels) -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My website: http://sandrotosi.me/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+SandroTosi
