Re: Two django packages for Debian?
On 7 August 2014 00:08, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > > I am on the edge. I prefer dgit > > and I would love to try them all before we make a decisionน > Would be interested in a brief summary of the different workflows possible, and a comparison. I have not been keeping up. At the moment, in subversion, we only store the debian/* directory. Is there any requirement/benefit in putting the full upstream source in git too? -- Brian May
Re: Django 1.7 preparations
On 8 August 2014 07:48, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > I rebuilt all reverse deps of python-django and I tagged confirmed all the > associated bugs where the package failed to build with python-django 1.7 > and I sent the relevant extract of the build log... > Hello, I noticed python-kombu build depends on python-django, and the binary packages suggest python-django. Possibly you missed this package, as the django support is optional. Is it ok if package supplies a "migrations" directory containing south migrations? My preliminary tests seem to indicate that Django 1.7 can ignore these successfully. Thanks -- Brian May
